GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 10, No. 24 ( 2004-12-15), p. 8301-8308
    Abstract: Purpose: Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibitors have been used to induce leukemia blast cell differentiation but have not been tested in multiple myeloma for activity. Currently, available IMPDH inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is known as an immunosuppressant, was shown to induce apoptosis in myeloma cell lines. On the basis of our preclinical studies, we designed a clinical study to test our hypothesis that MMF has antimyeloma activity. Experimental Design: A Phase I MMF dose escalation study was conducted in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients who had documented disease progression by myeloma markers or bone marrow plasmacytosis to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and efficacy of the drug. To assess the activity of IMPDH inhibition in the myeloma cells of patients, we measured intracellular nucleotide triphosphate levels by high-performance liquid chromatography-based analysis and examined the correlation with clinical response. Results: Among the 11 study patients, MMF was generally well tolerated and was administered up to a maximum dose of 5g/day. The most common toxicity was grade 1 fatigue (n = 4, 36%). One patient had a partial response (3g/day), four patients had stable disease, and six patients had progression of disease. There was a statistically significant difference in the intracellular dGTP level changes between the stable disease/partial response group versus progression of disease. Conclusions: MMF at 1 to 5 g/day daily dose is well tolerated by patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients. Positive correlation between clinical response and depletion of intracellular dGTP level was shown. Future drug development to target this enzyme maybe useful in treating myelomas.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2004
    In:  Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, No. 21 ( 2004-11-01), p. 7375-7381
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 10, No. 21 ( 2004-11-01), p. 7375-7381
    Abstract: Purpose: To optimize treatment strategies for postmenopausal breast cancer patients, we investigated the efficacy of the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane alone or in combination with the antiestrogen tamoxifen in a xenograft model of postmenopausal breast cancer. We also determined the effects of these agents in sequential second-line therapy and the effect of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole on tumors that progressed on the above treatments. Experimental: Aromatase-transfected human estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells (MCF-7Ca) were grown as tumors in ovariectomized athymic mice. Animals received subcutaneous injection with vehicle, tamoxifen, exemestane, tamoxifen plus exemestane, and letrozole. Tumor volumes were measured weekly. Results: All treatments were effective initially in suppressing tumor growth as first-line therapy compared with vehicle treatment. Exemestane suppressed tumor growth to a greater extent than tamoxifen. However, the combination of tamoxifen plus exemestane was more effective than either drug alone. After tumor volumes doubled on initial treatment, the mice were crossed over to receive exemestane or tamoxifen. Tumor growth slowed briefly in mice treated with tamoxifen and crossed over to exemestane, but tumor growth continued unabated in those changed from exemestane to tamoxifen. However, letrozole was effective in both groups as third-line therapy for a limited period. Letrozole as initial single agent was the best overall treatment in terms of the degree of tumor suppression and the length of effectiveness of treatment. Conclusion: Exemestane was more effective in controlling tumor growth than tamoxifen. In addition, the combination of exemestane plus tamoxifen was clearly more effective than sequential use of these agents in the tumor model. However, the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line therapy was overall the most effective treatment in controlling tumor growth.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...