GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Wiley, Vol. 30, No. 3 ( 2020-05), p. 165-175
    Abstract: Subway train operation is a complex, sociotechnical system that involves a variety of cognitively demanding tasks. The train operators are responsible for continuously monitoring the surrounding environment, maintaining awareness, processing information, and making decisions under risk. The resulting mental strain on operators can negatively affect their performance and the interaction of the human–machine system. The objective of this study was to evaluate if physiological, subjective, and performance measures could identify the level of mental workloads arising from routine and nonroutine operations in the subway system. A total of 11 subway train operators underwent different driving scenarios in a high‐fidelity simulator. The simulated tasks were divided into two categories: routine operations (preparing to drive and driving between stations without interruptions or emergencies) and nonroutine operation (responding to a tunnel fire, dealing with a high density of passengers, encountering a passenger/technician on the track, and responding to train failure). The mental workload was monitored and evaluated in these tasks using an electrocardiogram, subjective self‐rating scales, and driving performance. Both heart rate variability and performance measures (including reaction time and error rate) detected mental workload variations in the different operations. On the other hand, the subjective ratings (including NASA‐TLX) assessed the overall mental workload associated with a task, without explaining the mental demand variations within the task over time. Subway train drivers experienced different levels of mental workload during routine and nonroutine driving conditions. The findings of this study can be used to extract mental workload limits to optimize workload levels during train operations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1090-8471 , 1520-6564
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2545795-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2006699-5
    SSG: 3,2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Phytotherapy Research, Wiley
    Abstract: We aimed to investigate whether nano‐curcumin as an anti‐inflammatory agent is effective in patients with mild and moderate AP. This study was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm randomized controlled trial conducted at Taleghani hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eligible subjects with a diagnosis of mild and moderate AP were randomly assigned to receive either two doses of nano‐curcumin (40 mg) or placebo (control) daily for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was gastrointestinal (GI) ward length of stay (LOS). A total of 42 patients were randomly assigned to receive either nano‐curcumin ( n  = 21) or placebo ( n  = 21). Compared with placebo, nano‐curcumin supplementation decreased hospital LOS (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.502–0.894; p  = 0.006), reduced the need for analgesics over time (OR = 0.576, 95% CI: 0.421–0.790; p  = 0.001), and increased overall appetite score over the study period ( β  = 0.104, SE: 0.053; p  = 0.049). No adverse effects or mortality were reported and there was no withdrawal during the study period. The results indicate that nano‐curcumin as an adjuvant therapy is safe and may reduce GI ward LOS, analgesics requirement, and improve the overall appetite in patients with mild and moderate AP. Future multi‐center trials with larger sample sizes are required to verify these findings. Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04989166.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0951-418X , 1099-1573
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1493490-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...