GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Epilepsia, Wiley, Vol. 59, No. 8 ( 2018-08), p. 1549-1556
    Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness, retention, and tolerability of brivaracetam ( BRV ) in genetic generalized epilepsies ( GGE ) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients that started BRV in 2016 and 2017. Results A total of 61 patients (mean age = 29.8, range = 9‐90 years, 41 female [67%]) were treated with BRV . They were difficult to control, with 2.4 failed antiepileptic drugs ( AED s) in the past, taking 1.9 AED s on average at baseline. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 7 days to 24 months, with a mean retention time of 7.9 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 483 months. The retention rate was 82% at 3 months and 69% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 36% (50% responder rate), with 25% seizure‐free for 3 months. Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy showed a responder rate of 60%, with 40% being free of any seizures. Long‐term 50% responder rate was present in 17 patients (28%; 11 seizure‐free [18%] ) for 〉 6 months and in 14 patients (23%; 10 seizure‐free [16%]) for 〉 12 months. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were observed in 26% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, ataxia, and psychobehavioral adverse events. Use of intravenous BRV with bolus injection of 200‐300 mg in two females with absence status epilepticus was well tolerated, but did not result in cessation of status epilepticus. Significance Use of BRV in GGE is well tolerated, and 50% responder rates are similar to those observed in the regulatory trials for focal epilepsies. An immediate switch from levetiracetam ( LEV ) to BRV at a ratio of 15:1 is feasible. The occurrence of psychobehavioral adverse events seems less prominent than under LEV , and a switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV ‐induced adverse events.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0013-9580 , 1528-1167
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002194-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Epilepsia, Wiley, Vol. 58, No. 7 ( 2017-07), p. 1208-1216
    Abstract: To evaluate factors predicting efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam ( BRV ) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients who started BRV between February and November 2016 with observation time between 3 and 12 months. Results Of a total of 262 patients (mean age 40, range 5–81 years, 129 male) treated with BRV , 227 (87%) were diagnosed to have focal, 19 (7%) idiopathic generalized and 8 (3%) symptomatic generalized epilepsy, whereas 8 (3%) were unclassified. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 1 day to 12 months, with a median retention time of 6.1 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 1,504 months. The retention rate was 79.4% at 3 months and 75.8% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 41.2% (50% responder rate) with 14.9% seizure‐free for 3 months and, at 6 months, 40.5% with 15.3% seizure‐free. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were observed in 37.8% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, dizziness, and behavioral adverse events ( BAEs ). BAE that presented under previous levetiracetam ( LEV ) treatment improved upon switch to BRV in 57.1% (20/35) and LEV ‐induced somnolence improved in 70.8% (17/24). Patients with BAE on LEV were more likely to develop BAE on BRV (odds ratio [ OR ] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [ CI ] 1.53–7.95). Significance BRV in broad clinical postmarketing use is a well‐tolerated anticonvulsant drug with 50% responder rates, similar to those observed in the regulatory trials, even though 90% of the patients included had previously been exposed to LEV . An immediate switch from LEV to BRV at a ratio of 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible. The only independent significant predictor of efficacy was the start of BRV in patients not currently taking LEV . The occurrence of BAE during previous LEV exposure predicted poor psychobehavioral tolerability of BRV treatment. A switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV ‐induced BAE .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0013-9580 , 1528-1167
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002194-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...