GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2016
    In:  Bioethics Vol. 30, No. 7 ( 2016-09), p. 536-546
    In: Bioethics, Wiley, Vol. 30, No. 7 ( 2016-09), p. 536-546
    Abstract: Surgical innovation promises improvements in healthcare, but it also raises ethical issues including risks of harm to patients, conflicts of interest and increased injustice in access to health care. In this article, we focus on risks of injustice, and use a case study of robotic prostatectomy to identify features of surgical innovation that risk introducing or exacerbating injustices. Interpreting justice as encompassing matters of both efficiency and equity, we first examine questions relating to government decisions about whether to publicly fund access to innovative treatments. Here the case of robotic prostatectomy exemplifies the difficulty of accommodating healthcare priorities such as improving the health of marginalized groups. It also illustrates challenges with estimating the likely long‐term costs and benefits of a new intervention, the difficulty of comparing outcomes of an innovative treatment to those of established treatments, and the further complexity associated with patient and surgeon preferences. Once the decision has been made to fund a new procedure, separate issues of justice arise at the level of providing care to individual patients. Here, the case of robotic prostatectomy exemplifies how features of surgical innovation, such as surgeon learning curves and the need for an adequate volume of cases at a treatment centre, can exacerbate injustices associated with treatment cost and the logistics of travelling for treatment. Drawing on our analysis, we conclude by making a number of recommendations for the just introduction of surgical innovations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0269-9702 , 1467-8519
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 632984-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1480658-7
    SSG: 0
    SSG: 12
    SSG: 1
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2017
    In:  Medical Journal of Australia Vol. 207, No. 2 ( 2017-07), p. 89-90
    In: Medical Journal of Australia, Wiley, Vol. 207, No. 2 ( 2017-07), p. 89-90
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0025-729X , 1326-5377
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 186082-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2035730-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 18, No. 5 ( 2012-10), p. 984-991
    In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Wiley, Vol. 18, No. 5 ( 2012-10), p. 984-991
    Abstract: This paper raises questions about the epistemological foundations of evidence‐based medicine ( EBM ). We argue that EBM is based upon reliabilist epistemological assumptions, and that this is appropriate – we should focus on identifying the most reliable processes for generating and collecting medical knowledge. However, we note that this should not be reduced to narrow questions about which research methodologies are the best for gathering evidence. Reliable processes for generating medical evidence might lie outside of formal research methods. We also question the notion of the knower that is assumed by EBM . We argue that EBM assumes an enlightenment conception of knowers as autonomous, substitutable individuals. This conception is troubled by the way that clinicians learn the role of anecdote in health care and the role of patient choice, all of which bring into play features of clinicians and patients as situated individuals with particular backgrounds and experiences. EBM 's enlightenment conception of the knower is also troubled by aspects of the way evidence is produced. Given these limitations, we argue that EBM should retain its reliabilist bent, but should look beyond formal research methodologies in identifying processes that yield reliable evidence for clinical practice. We suggest looking to feminist epistemology, with its focus on the standpoints of individual situated knowers, and the role of social context in determining what counts as knowledge.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1356-1294 , 1365-2753
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2006772-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1327355-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Medical Journal of Australia, Wiley, Vol. 212, No. 2 ( 2020-02), p. 57-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0025-729X , 1326-5377
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 186082-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2035730-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2016
    In:  Hastings Center Report Vol. 46, No. 6 ( 2016-11), p. 14-24
    In: Hastings Center Report, Wiley, Vol. 46, No. 6 ( 2016-11), p. 14-24
    Abstract: One day soon it may be possible to replace a failing heart, liver, or kidney with a long‐lasting mechanical replacement or perhaps even with a 3‐D printed version based on the patient's own tissue. Such artificial organs could make transplant waiting lists and immunosuppression a thing of the past. Supposing that this happens, what will the ongoing care of people with these implants involve? In particular, how will the need to maintain the functioning of artificial organs over an extended period affect patients and their doctors and the responsibilities of those who manufacture such devices? Drawing on lessons from the history of the cardiac pacemaker, this article offers an initial survey of the ethical issues posed by the need to maintain and service artificial organs. We briefly outline the nature and history of cardiac pacemakers, with a particular focus on the need for technical support, maintenance, and replacement of these devices. Drawing on the existing medical literature and on our conversations and correspondence with cardiologists, regulators, and manufacturers, we describe five sources of ethical issues associated with pacemaker maintenance: the location of the devices inside the human body, such that maintenance generates surgical risks; the complexity of the devices, which increases the risk of harms to patients as well as introducing potential injustices in access to treatment; the role of software—particularly software that can be remotely accessed—in the functioning of the devices, which generates privacy and security issues; the impact of continual development and improvement of the device; and the influence of commercial interests in the context of a medical device market in which there are several competing products. Finally, we offer some initial suggestions as to how these questions should be answered.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0093-0334 , 1552-146X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 194940-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067369-3
    SSG: 0
    SSG: 1
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...