GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, Wiley, Vol. 61, No. 10 ( 2018-08), p. 757-763
    Abstract: [ 18 F]DCFPyL is a clinical‐stage PET radiotracer used to image prostate cancer. This report details the efficient production of [ 18 F]DCFPyL using single‐step direct radiofluorination, without the use of carboxylic acid‐protecting groups. Radiolabeling reaction optimization studies revealed an inverse correlation between the amount of precursor used and the radiochemical yield. This simplified approach enabled automated preparation of [ 18 F]DCFPyL within 28 minutes using HPLC purification (26% ± 6%, at EOS, n = 4), which was then scaled up for large‐batch pro duction to generate 1.46 ± 0.23 Ci of [ 18 F]DCFPyL at EOS (n = 7) in high molar activity (37 933 ± 4158 mCi/μmol, 1403 ± 153 GBq/μmol, at EOS, n = 7). Further, this work enabled the development of [ 18 F]DCFPyL production in 21 minutes using an easy cartridge‐based purification (25% ± 9% radiochemical yield, at EOS, n = 3).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0362-4803 , 1099-1344
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1491841-9
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Vol. 60, No. 2 ( 2016-04), p. 255-259
    In: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, Wiley, Vol. 60, No. 2 ( 2016-04), p. 255-259
    Abstract: We assessed the inter‐ and intra‐observer variability in contouring the prostate bed for radiation therapy planning using MRI compared with computed tomography ( CT ). Methods We selected 15 patients with prior radical prostatectomy. All had CT and MRI simulation for planning purposes. Image fusions were done between CT and MRI . Three radiation oncologists with several years of experience in treating prostate cancer contoured the prostate bed first on CT and then on MRI . Before contouring, each radiation oncologist had to review the R adiation T herapy O ncology G roup guidelines for postoperative external beam radiotherapy. The agreement between volumes was calculated using the D ice similarity coefficient ( DSC ). Analysis was done using the Matlab software. The DSC was compared using non‐parametric statistical tests. Results Contouring on CT alone showed a statistically significant ( P  = 0.001) higher similarity between observers with a mean DSC of 0.76 (standard deviation ± 0.05) compared with contouring on MRI with a mean of 0.66 (standard deviation ± 0.05). Mean intra‐observer variability between CT and MRI was 0.68, 0.75 and 0.78 for the three observers. The clinical target volume was 19–74% larger on CT than on MRI . The intra‐observer difference in clinical target volume between CT and MRI was statistically significant in two observers and non‐significant in the third one ( P  = 0.09). Conclusions We found less inter‐observer variability when contouring on CT than on MRI . R adiation T herapy O ncology G roup contouring guidelines are based on anatomical landmarks readily visible on CT . These landmarks are more inter‐observer dependent on MRI . Therefore, present contouring guidelines might not be applicable to MRI planning.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1754-9477 , 1754-9485
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2409071-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: BJU International, Wiley, Vol. 114, No. 6 ( 2014-12), p. 865-871
    Abstract: To study the prognostic value of the U niversity of C alifornia, S an F rancisco C ancer of the P rostate R isk A ssessment ( CAPRA ) score to predict biochemical failure ( bF ) after various doses of external beam radiotherapy ( EBRT ) and/or permanent seed low‐dose rate ( LDR ) prostate brachytherapy ( PB ). Patients and Methods We retrospectively analysed 345 patients with intermediate‐risk prostate cancer, with PSA levels of 10–20 ng/mL and/or G leason 7 including 244 EBRT patients (70.2–79.2  G y) and 101 patients treated with LDR PB . The minimum follow‐up was 3 years. No patient received primary androgen‐deprivation therapy. bF was defined according to the P hoenix definition. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the differences between CAPRA groups. Results The overall bF rate was 13% (45/345). The CAPRA score, as a continuous variable, was statistically significant in multivariate analysis for predicting bF (hazard ratio [ HR ] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [ CI ] 1.10–1.72, P = 0.006). There was a trend for a lower bF rate in patients treated with LDR PB when compared with those treated by EBRT ≤ 74  G y ( HR 0.234, 95% CI 0.05–1.03, P = 0.055) in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients with a CAPRA score of 3–5, CAPRA remained predictive of bF as a continuous variable ( HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01–2.27, P = 0.047) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion The CAPRA score is useful for predicting biochemical recurrence in patients treated for intermediate‐risk prostate cancer with EBRT or LDR PB . It could help in treatment decisions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1464-4096 , 1464-410X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019983-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...