GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • The Endocrine Society  (2)
  • 1
    In: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, The Endocrine Society, Vol. 105, No. 12 ( 2020-12-01), p. e4393-e4406
    Abstract: We set forth to compare ethnicities for metabolic and immunological characteristics at the clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess the effect of ethnicity on beta-cell functional loss within 3 years after clinical diagnosis. Research Methods and Design We studied participants in TrialNet New Onset Intervention Trials (n = 624, median age = 14.4 years, 58% male, 8.7% Hispanic) and followed them prospectively for 3 years. Mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) were performed within 6 months following clinical diagnosis and repeated semiannually. Unless otherwise indicated, analyses were adjusted for age, sex, BMI Z-score, and diabetes duration. Results At T1D clinical diagnosis, Hispanics, compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHW), had a higher frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (44.7% vs 25.3%, OR = 2.36, P = 0.01), lower fasting glucose (97 vs 109 mg/dL, P = 0.02) and higher fasting C-peptide (1.23 vs 0.94 ng/mL, P = 0.02) on the first MMTT, and higher frequency of ZnT8 autoantibody positivity (n = 201, 94.1% vs 64%, OR = 7.98, P = 0.05). After exclusion of participants in experimental arms of positive clinical trials, C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) trajectories during the first 3 years after clinical diagnosis were not significantly different between Hispanics and NHW after adjusting for age, sex, BMI-z score, and DKA (n = 413, P = 0.14). Conclusion Despite differences in the metabolic and immunological characteristics at clinical diagnosis of T1D between Hispanics and NHW, C-peptide trajectories did not differ significantly in the first 3 years following clinical diagnosis after adjustment for body mass index and other confounders. These findings may inform the design of observational studies and intervention trials in T1D.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0021-972X , 1945-7197
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: The Endocrine Society
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026217-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of the Endocrine Society, The Endocrine Society, Vol. 6, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-11-01), p. A844-A845
    Abstract: The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing worldwide. A third of new thyroid cancer cases are small papillary thyroid cancer (1.5 cm or less in size). Although surgical intervention is the most common management option for patients with small papillary thyroid cancer (SPTC), active surveillance (AS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), laser ablation (LA), and microwave ablation (MWA) are also considered as management alternatives. This study aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of surgical (TS) vs. non-surgical management options for patients with SPTC. Methods We included studies comparing any type of TS versus AS, LA, RFA, or MWA in patients with a biopsy-proven SPTC of less than 1.5 cm without evidence of preoperative local or distant metastasis. The outcomes of interest were risk of recurrence of thyroid cancer, disease-specific mortality, and quality of life (QoL). All outcomes were measured at the longest follow-up. Literature search used Cochrane Database, Embase, and MEDLINE from inception to June 3rd, 2020. The CLARITY tool was used to assess the risk of bias. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. We estimated mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) based on predetermined criteria for continuous outcomes. PROSPERO (CRD42021235657). Results We included 14 retrospective cohort studies consisting of 6457 patients. TS, AS, RFA, MWA, and LA therapies were performed in 67.50% (n=4291), 21.03% (n=1337), 7.53% (n=479), 2.49% (n=255), and 1.27% (n=81) of cases, respectively. Disease-specific mortality (mean follow-up ranged from 37.5 to 120.0 months) was not different between patients who underwent TS versus AS. There was no data on mortality for the other noninvasive approaches. The risk of recurrence (mean follow-up ranged from 17.0 to 49.2 months) was not different when comparing LA, RFA, AS, or MWA against TS. The overall physical health domain of QoL (mean follow-up ranged from 10.8 to 29.6 months) was increased in patients who underwent AS (SMD: 0.23 95%CI 0.09; 0.37, k=2, I2=0.00%) compared to TS, but it was no different when comparing MWA or RFA versus TS. In addition, there were no differences in the overall mental health domain of QoL comparing AS or RFA vs TS. The risk of bias was considered moderate in nine studies and high in five studies. Conclusion Low evidence quality suggests equal risk of recurrence and mortality between SPTC patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment modalities or active surveillance compared to surgery. However, physical QoL was better in SPTC patients who underwent AS. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and draw robust conclusions. Presentation: Saturday, June 11, 2022 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2472-1972
    Language: English
    Publisher: The Endocrine Society
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2881023-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...