GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • The American Association of Immunologists  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • The American Association of Immunologists  (2)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The American Association of Immunologists ; 2020
    In:  The Journal of Immunology Vol. 204, No. 1_Supplement ( 2020-05-01), p. 222.3-222.3
    In: The Journal of Immunology, The American Association of Immunologists, Vol. 204, No. 1_Supplement ( 2020-05-01), p. 222.3-222.3
    Abstract: While there is much discussion in education literature about the benefits of a flipped classroom, medical educators still typically rely on traditional didactic lectures as a primary teaching modality. In fact, when given a choice of delivery modalities, learners often prefer to engage in the easier and comfortable route to knowledge, including listening to lectures. However, traditional learning through passive techniques such as reading and listening is less effective because it fails to facilitate application and recall of concepts. High order learning and retention is significantly improved when the learning process is challenging and thought-provoking. We use immunology within a medical school curriculum to compare the effectiveness of and student preferences for two distinct teaching modalities. Data will be collected from 170 first year medical students at our institution. The immunology unit consists of 5 sessions, each session linked to 3–4 exam items. Four sessions consist of prerecorded lectures provided to students prior to class. In class, students complete a short individual quiz with low-level questions, the quiz is reviewed, and the remaining class time is spent doing high-level application problems. The final session is delivered as a didactic, in-class lecture. For that final session, students are provided with the low-level quiz and high-level application problems to do at their own discretion. No aspect of the learning activities is required or graded. Following the unit, students will be anonymously surveyed regarding preferences of content delivery modalities. Effectiveness of delivery modalities will be compared by assessing student performance on linked exam items. The unit concludes in November 2019.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-1767 , 1550-6606
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: The American Association of Immunologists
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475085-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The American Association of Immunologists ; 2021
    In:  The Journal of Immunology Vol. 206, No. 1_Supplement ( 2021-05-01), p. 54.14-54.14
    In: The Journal of Immunology, The American Association of Immunologists, Vol. 206, No. 1_Supplement ( 2021-05-01), p. 54.14-54.14
    Abstract: Education literature reports the benefits of flipped classrooms (FC), but medical educators still typically rely on traditional didactic lectures (TL) as a primary teaching modality. In fact, when given a choice of delivery modalities, learners often prefer to engage in the easier and comfortable route to knowledge, including listening to lectures. However, learning through passive techniques is less effective because it fails to facilitate application and recall of concepts. High order learning and retention is significantly improved when the learning process is challenging and thought-provoking. We used immunology within a medical school curriculum to compare the effectiveness of and student preferences for two distinct teaching modalities: FC and TL. Data was collected from 170 first year medical students at our institution. In the FC modality, prerecorded lectures were provided to students prior to class. In class, students completed a quiz with low-level questions, the quiz was reviewed, and the remaining class time was spent doing high-level application problems. For the TL, students were provided with the low-level quiz and high-level application problems to do at their own discretion. No aspect of the learning activities was required or graded. Our data show that students who performed poorly on exam items linked to the traditional lecture benefitted disproportionately from the flipped classroom modality, though there was no difference in learning outcomes between the two modalities overall. Finally, students who provided feedback about their learning preferences overwhelmingly preferred traditional lectures and denied learning gains from the flipped modality.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-1767 , 1550-6606
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: The American Association of Immunologists
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475085-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...