ISSN:
1573-8477
Keywords:
life history
;
reproductive effort
;
resource allocation
;
size at maturity
;
state variable model
;
Yoldia notabilis
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
Abstract The effects of the morphological constraint of maximum reproductive output (reproductive capacity) and the size at which individuals can avoid heavy mortality (refuge size) on the resource allocation pattern between growth and reproduction are investigated using a dynamic modelling approach for a population of Yoldia notabilis (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in Otsuchi Bay, northeastern Japan. A state variable model is developed using field data on shell length, somatic weight, production, survivorship and reproductive capacity of the bivalve. The optimal allocation pattern is characterized by sudden switching from growth to reproduction without the assumption of reproductive capacity, while simultaneous investment in growth and reproduction becomes optimal when maximum reproductive output is limited by reproductive capacity. Size-specific reproductive effort, size at maturity and the growth curve predicted by the latter model fit more closely to the field data, suggesting that size-limited reproductive capacity can play an important role in the evolution of the observed resource allocation pattern. The mortality pattern affects optimal size at maturity, but not size-specific reproductive effort after maturity. When refuge size is fixed, optimal size at maturity increases with survivorship above refuge size. Optimal size at maturity changes in a more complex way with changes in refuge size. Size at maturity remains constant when refuge size is small, increases when it is intermediate, and decreases when it is large. The results suggest that refuge size is an important factor in the evolution of size at maturity, although its contribution varies depending on the values of other factors, such as size-dependent production and survivorship above refuge size.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006556301655
Permalink