GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • S. Karger AG  (3)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • S. Karger AG  (3)
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 1
    In: Liver Cancer, S. Karger AG, Vol. 9, No. 3 ( 2020), p. 308-325
    Kurzfassung: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Introduction: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The benefits of combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib (TACE-S) over TACE alone for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. Yet, such populations are heterogeneous in terms of baseline characteristics. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Objective: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 To investigate the predictors of survival benefits from added sorafenib and identify the potential candidates for TACE-S. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 This multicenter observational study was conducted in 17 Chinese tertiary hospitals for patients with unresectable, liver-confined HCC. Eligible patients with performance status score of ≤1 and Child-Pugh score of ≤7 were treated with TACE or TACE-S. Interactions between treatment and baseline variables were evaluated to find indicators for survival benefits, based on which the patients were stratified. Multivariate models adjusted for baseline characteristics or propensity score were used to compare overall survival (OS) and time to tumor progression (TTP). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 From January 2009 to December 2015, 1,719 consecutive patients received TACE ( 〈 i 〉 n 〈 /i 〉 = 1,406) or TACE-S ( 〈 i 〉 n 〈 /i 〉 = 313). Although TACE-S compared with TACE improved TTP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.008), no difference in OS was observed (adjusted HR 0.87, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.090). Nevertheless, the tumor burden (sum of maximum diameter of largest tumor [cm] and tumor number) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score independently predicted the survival benefits from added sorafenib (interaction 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001). For patients with either moderate tumor burden (7–13) or low ALBI score (no more than –2.8) defined as candidates, TACE-S prolonged OS (adjusted HR 0.73, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.003) and TTP (adjusted HR 0.72, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.014) compared to TACE alone, whereas its superiority disappeared in non-candidates. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Not all unresectable HCC patients but those with moderate tumor burden or low ALBI score achieve survival benefits from TACE-S compared with TACE alone. Future randomized controlled trials focusing on the subset are warranted.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 2235-1795 , 1664-5553
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: S. Karger AG
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2666925-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Liver Cancer, S. Karger AG, Vol. 11, No. 4 ( 2022), p. 368-382
    Kurzfassung: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Introduction: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus lenvatinib alone in real-world practice. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 This retrospective analysis included 142 consecutive patients who received lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE and 69 patients who received lenvatinib alone as first-line treatment from 15 Chinese academic centers from November 2018 to November 2019. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, and safety profiles were compared between the two groups. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The median OS and PFS were significantly longer in the combined therapy group than in the monotherapy group in whole cohort (median OS, 15.9 vs. 8.6 months, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.0022; median PFS, 8.6 vs. 4.4 months, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001) and after propensity score matching analysis (median OS, 13.8 vs. 7.8 months, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.03; median PFS, 7.8 vs. 4.5 months, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.009). Moreover, the treatment option was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS with adjustment based upon baseline characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] : 0.36–0.78, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.001, and adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.30–0.60, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001, respectively) and propensity score (adjusted HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36–0.76, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.001, and adjusted HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33–0.64, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001, respectively). Moreover, a greater ORR was observed in the combined group (ORR: 46.48% vs. 13.05%, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001). Furthermore, the most common adverse events (AEs) were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (54.9%) and fatigue (46.4%) in the lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE group and lenvatinib group, respectively. Most AEs were mild-to-moderate and manageable. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 With well-tolerated safety, lenvatinib plus DEB-TACE was more effective than lenvatinib monotherapy in improving OS, PFS, and ORR. Thus, it may be a promising treatment for advanced HCC. Future prospective studies confirming these findings are warranted.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 2235-1795 , 1664-5553
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: S. Karger AG
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2666925-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Vascular Research, S. Karger AG, Vol. 58, No. 5 ( 2021), p. 330-342
    Kurzfassung: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Objective: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 This study investigates the synergistic effects of Gleevec (imatinib) and rapamycin on the proliferative and angiogenic properties of mouse bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Materials and Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 EPCs were isolated from mouse bone marrow and treated with different concentrations of Gleevec or rapamycin individually or in combination. The cell viability and proliferation were examined using the MTT assay. An analysis of cell cycle and apoptosis was performed using flow cytometry. Formation of capillary-like tubes was examined in vitro, and the protein expression of cell differentiation markers was determined using Western blot analysis. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Gleevec significantly reduced cell viability, cell proliferation, and induced cell apoptosis in EPCs. Rapamycin had similar effects on EPCs, but it did not induce cell apoptosis. The combination of Gleevec and rapamycin reduced the cell proliferation but increased cell apoptosis. Although rapamycin had no demonstratable effect on tube formation, the combined therapy of Gleevec and rapamycin significantly reduced tube formation when compared with Gleevec alone. Mechanistically, Gleevec, but not rapamycin, induced a significant elevation in caspase-3 activity in EPCs, and it attenuated the expression of the endothelial protein marker platelet-derived growth factor receptor α. Functionally, rapamycin, but not Gleevec, significantly enhanced the expression of endothelial differentiation marker proteins, while attenuating the expression of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling-related proteins. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Gleevec and rapamycin synergistically suppress cell proliferation and tube formation of EPCs by inducing cell apoptosis and endothelial differentiation. Mechanistically, it is likely that rapamycin enhances the proapoptotic and antiangiogenic effects of Gleevec by promoting the endothelial differentiation of EPCs. Given that EPCs are involved in the pathogenesis of some cardiovascular diseases and critical to angiogenesis, pharmacological inhibition of EPC proliferation by combined Gleevec and rapamycin therapy may be a promising approach for suppressing cardiovascular disease pathologies associated with angiogenesis.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1018-1172 , 1423-0135
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: S. Karger AG
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 1482726-8
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...