GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Hormone Research in Paediatrics, S. Karger AG, Vol. 92, No. 1 ( 2019), p. 1-14
    Abstract: The Growth Hormone Research Society (GRS) convened a Workshop in March 2019 to evaluate the diagnosis and therapy of short stature in children. Forty-six international experts participated at the invitation of GRS including clinicians, basic scientists, and representatives from regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. Following plenary presentations addressing the current diagnosis and therapy of short stature in children, breakout groups discussed questions produced in advance by the planning committee and reconvened to share the group reports. A writing team assembled one document that was subsequently discussed and revised by participants. Participants from regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies were not part of the writing process. Short stature is the most common reason for referral to the pediatric endocrinologist. History, physical examination, and auxology remain the most important methods for understanding the reasons for the short stature. While some long-standing topics of controversy continue to generate debate, including in whom, and how, to perform and interpret growth hormone stimulation tests, new research areas are changing the clinical landscape, such as the genetics of short stature, selection of patients for genetic testing, and interpretation of genetic tests in the clinical setting. What dose of growth hormone to start, how to adjust the dose, and how to identify and manage a suboptimal response are still topics to debate. Additional areas that are expected to transform the growth field include the development of long-acting growth hormone preparations and other new therapeutics and diagnostics that may increase adult height or aid in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1663-2818 , 1663-2826
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540224-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2015
    In:  Hormone Research in Paediatrics Vol. 84, No. 5 ( 2015), p. 298-304
    In: Hormone Research in Paediatrics, S. Karger AG, Vol. 84, No. 5 ( 2015), p. 298-304
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Aims: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 To investigate whether short children born very preterm ( 〈 32 weeks of gestation) exhibit features of growth hormone (GH) resistance compared to term peers. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We studied 26 prepubertal children (aged 7.0 ± 2.0 years) with short stature (height adjusted for parents' heights 〈 10th percentile), who were born appropriate for gestational age and either very preterm (n = 11) or at term (n = 15). Children underwent insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) generation test via a daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) dose (0.05 mg/kg/day) over 4 consecutive days. Hormone and binding proteins were measured at baseline and day 5. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 At baseline, preterm children had lower IGF-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1; -22%; p = 0.049) and IGFBP-3 (-24%; p = 0.013) concentrations than term children. Preterm children also had insulin concentrations that tended to be 39% higher (p = 0.059) than term peers. After stimulation, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations increased similarly in term and preterm groups, while GH-binding protein (GHBP) concentrations decreased in both groups. Preterm children had higher GHBP (+50%; p = 0.049), insulin (+86%; p = 0.005), and leptin (+107%; p = 0.020) but lower IGFBP-1 (-47%; p = 0.006) concentrations than term children following rhGH stimulation. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Preterm children who are short for genetic height potential show no evidence of GH resistance that would explain their short stature. However, there was indirect evidence of insulin resistance in the preterm children, as previously described in this group.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1663-2818 , 1663-2826
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540224-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2005
    In:  Hormone Research in Paediatrics Vol. 64, No. Suppl. 3 ( 2005), p. 25-31
    In: Hormone Research in Paediatrics, S. Karger AG, Vol. 64, No. Suppl. 3 ( 2005), p. 25-31
    Abstract: The ‘gold standard’ techniques used to measure insulin sensitivity in children are the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp and Bergman’s minimal model. Although precise, these techniques are complex, invasive and time consuming. Alternative indirect measures of insulin sensitivity have been developed that utilize fasting glucose and insulin data in algorithms or computer programs. These methods include homeostatic model assessment (HOMA), the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and the glucose to insulin ratio (G:I). Each of these three fasting techniques has been developed and validated in adults, with little or no validation in children. Increasingly, HOMA and QUICKI are being used in childhood studies to assess insulin sensitivity. In a group of 79 pre-pubertal children, we found that the correlation between the minimal model and R 〈 sub 〉 HOMA 〈 /sub 〉 (r = –0.4) was no better than that between the minimal model and fasting insulin (r = 0.4), with an even weaker correlation between the minimal model and QUICKI (r = 0.2). In addition, neither HOMA nor QUICKI were able to detect a reduction in insulin sensitivity with obesity or during growth hormone therapy, unlike the minimal model. In children with normal glucose levels, neither HOMA nor QUICKI was superior to fasting insulin. Validation of the derivation formulae for these methods in children is needed before they are more widely used. The potential benefits of these simple fasting techniques is that they are useful in large field studies. However, if the study groups are small or longitudinal changes in insulin sensitivity are sought, more precise techniques such as the clamp or minimal model should be used.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1663-2818 , 1663-2826
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540224-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...