GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Oncology Research and Treatment, S. Karger AG
    Abstract: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a scarcity of resources with various effects on the care of cancer patients. This paper provides an English summary of a German guideline on prioritization and resource allocation for colorectal and pancreatic cancer in the context of the pandemic. Based on a selective literature review as well as empirical and ethical analyses, the research team of the CancerCOVID Consortium drafted recommendations for prioritizing diagnostic and treatment measures for both entities. The final version of the guideline received consent from the executive boards of nine societies of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), 20 further professional organizations and 22 other experts from various disciplines as well as patient representatives. The guiding principle for the prioritization of decisions is the minimization of harm. Prioritization decisions to fulfill this overall goal should be guided by (1) the urgency relevant to avoid or reduce harm, (2) the likelihood of success of the diagnostic or therapeutic measure advised, and (3) the availability of alternative treatment options. In the event of a relevant risk of harm as a result of prioritization, these decisions should be made by means of a team approach. Gender, age, disability, ethnicity, origin, and other social characteristics, such as social or insurance status, as well as the vehemence of a patient’s treatment request and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status should not be used as prioritization criteria. The guideline provides concrete recommendations for (1) diagnostic procedures, (2) surgical procedures for cancer, and (3) systemic treatment and radiotherapy in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer within the context of the German healthcare system.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2296-5270 , 2296-5262
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2749752-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2011
    In:  Viszeralmedizin Vol. 27, No. 6 ( 2011), p. 455-460
    In: Viszeralmedizin, S. Karger AG, Vol. 27, No. 6 ( 2011), p. 455-460
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1662-6672 , 1662-6664
    Language: German
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2487201-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2850734-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Interventional Neurology, S. Karger AG, Vol. 1, No. 3-4 ( 2012), p. 143-150
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Purpose: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The role of endovascular treatment in cases of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is debatable. With an increasing number of endovascular therapies such as endovascular recanalization and embolization the number of complications such as iatrogenic dissection is also rising. We report our experience with endovascular stenting in the treatment of patients presenting with CeAD. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We included all consecutive patients with CeAD (n = 168) treated in our hospital between 2001 and 2010 for our retrospective study. Patients with CeAD were considered eligible for stenting: (1) in iatrogenic dissections and (2) in noniatrogenic dissections if they suffered from recurrent ischemic events despite antithrombotic treatment. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 During our observation period 10 out of 168 patients presenting with CeAD were selected for stenting. Several types of stents were used. Stenting was technically successful in 8 but unsuccessful in 2 patients with complete arterial occlusion. Stent-related clinically apparent complications occurred in 3 of the 10 patients. All were transient. During a mean follow-up of 47 (±24.8) months none of the patients had new cerebrovascular ischemic events. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 In our patient sample stenting due to dissection is a rare procedure performed in less than 10% of CAD patients. It should be considered as a feasible rescue treatment in cases of impending stroke despite optimal antithrombotic therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1664-9737 , 1664-5545
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2662855-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...