In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 18, No. 4 ( 2023-4-24), p. e0284933-
Abstract:
Gut content analyses have found that round gobies ( Neogobius melanostomus ) are highly dependent on dreissenid mussels but stable isotope analysis has often suggested that the dreissenid contribution is lower. However, estimation of dietary contributions with stable isotopes relies on accurate discrimination factors (fractionation factors). To test if discrimination values commonly used in aquatic food web studies are suitable for round gobies, we collected round gobies from Oneida Lake, raised them for 63 days under four different diets ( Chironomus plumosus , Mytilus chilensis , Dreissenia spp., Euphausia superba ) and measured the change in white muscle δ 13 C and δ 15 N. Gobies were also collected throughout Oneida Lake for gut content and stable isotope analysis. Diets changed as round gobies grew, with small round gobies (17-42mm) feeding mostly on cladocera and chironomids, intermediate sized gobies (43-94mm) transitioning from chironomid to dreissenid consumption, and larger gobies (95-120mm) predominantly consuming dreissenids, similar to findings in other studies. Discrimination factors were obtained by fitting a commonly used asymptotic regression equation describing changes in fish δ 13 C and δ 15 N as a function of time and diet stable isotope ratios. The discrimination factor determined for δ 13 C (-0.4‰ ± 0.32, SE) was lower than the “standard” value of 0.4‰, while that of δ 15 N (4.0‰ ± 0.32, SE) was higher than the standard value of 3.4‰. Turnover rates for both δ 13 C and δ 15 N were estimated as 0.02 ‰*day -1 . The use of experimentally determined discrimination factors rather than “standard” values resulted in model estimates that agree more closely with the observed increasing importance of dreissenids in gut content of larger gobies. Our results suggest that the importance of dreissenid mussels inferred from stable isotope studies may be underestimated when using standard isotopic discrimination values.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.r004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.r005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0284933.r006
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Permalink