GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (1)
Material
Publisher
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (1)
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2021
    In:  Nicotine & Tobacco Research Vol. 23, No. 9 ( 2021-08-18), p. 1459-1467
    In: Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 23, No. 9 ( 2021-08-18), p. 1459-1467
    Abstract: To examine the prevalence and the changing pattern of e-cigarette use from preconception to pregnancy. Aims and Methods This is a cross-sectional study using data from the multi-site Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in the United States, 2016–2017. All participating mothers with information on e-cigarette use before and during pregnancy were included. Self-reported information about e-cigarette use were assessed using questionnaires. Weighted prevalences of e-cigarette use before and during pregnancy were calculated. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine the association between various demographic characteristics and e-cigarette use before or during pregnancy. Results This study included 69 508 pregnant women from 38 states in the United States. The weighted prevalence of e-cigarette use before pregnancy and during the last 3 months of pregnancy was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4%–3.9%) and 1.1% (0.9%–1.2%), respectively. The prevalence varied across states, ranging from 1.3% to 8.3% for e-cigarette use before pregnancy and from 0.1% to 3.4% for e-cigarette use during the last 3 months of pregnancy. Among women who used e-cigarettes before pregnancy, 24.4% (21.7%–27.1%) continued to use e-cigarettes during pregnancy. Among women who used e-cigarettes during pregnancy, 62.3% (56.5%–68.0%) were dual users. In multivariable analyses, cigarette smoking was most strongly associated with e-cigarette use. The adjusted odds ratio comparing smokers with nonsmokers before pregnancy was 11.10 (95% CI 9.34–13.20) for e-cigarette use before pregnancy and 6.72 (95% CI 4.38–10.31) for e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Conclusions Using data from 38 states in the United States, we showed geographical variations in the prevalence of e-cigarette use before and during pregnancy. Among women who used e-cigarettes before pregnancy, a quarter of them continued to use e-cigarettes during pregnancy. Conventional cigarette use is a strong risk factor for e-cigarette use before and during pregnancy. The prevalence of e-cigarette use needs to be monitored continuously. Implications This study provides important information to understand the status and changing patterns of e-cigarette use in pregnant women in the United States. Among pregnant women in 38 states in the United States, 3.6% of them used e-cigarettes during the 3 months before pregnancy and 1.1% used them during the last 3 months of pregnancy. The prevalence varied across states. A quarter of women who used e-cigarettes before pregnancy continued to use e-cigarettes during pregnancy. Cigarette smoking is the strongest predictor of e-cigarette use. Future research about health effects of e-cigarette use during pregnancy is in urgent need.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1469-994X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020202-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...