In:
Optometry and Vision Science, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 96, No. 11 ( 2019-11), p. 879-889
Abstract:
Increasing prevalence of refractive error requires assessment of ametropia as a screening tool in children. If cycloplegia is not an option, knowledge about the increase in uncertainty for wavefront-based autorefraction is needed. The cycloplegic agent as the principal variant presents cross-reference and allows for extraction of the influence of accommodation. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the repeatability, agreement, and propensity to accommodate of cycloplegic (ARc) and noncycloplegic (ARnc) wavefront-based autorefraction (ZEISS i.Profiler plus; Carl Zeiss Vision, Aalen, Germany) in children aged 2 to 15 years. METHODS In a clinical setting, three consecutive measurements were feasible for 145 eyes (OD) under both conditions. Data are described by spherical equivalent ( M ), horizontal or vertical astigmatic component (J0), and oblique astigmatic component (J45). In the case of M , the most positive value of the three measurements was chosen, whereas the mean was applied for astigmatic components. RESULTS Regarding agreement, differences for ARc minus ARnc were statistically significant: for M , 0.55 (0.55 D; mean [SD]; P 〈 .001), that is, more hyperopic in cycloplegia; for J0, −0.03 (0.11 D; P = .002); and for J45, −0.03 D (SD, 0.09 D; P 〈 .001). Regarding repeatability, astigmatic components showed excellent repeatability: SD 〈 0.11 D (ARnc) and SD 〈 0.09 D (ARc). The repeatability of M was SD = 0.57 D with a 95% interval of 1.49 D (ARnc). Under cycloplegia, this decreased to SD = 0.17 D (ARc) with a 95% interval of 0.50 D. The mean propensity to accommodate was 0.44 D from repeated measurements; in cycloplegia, this was reduced to 0.19 D. CONCLUSIONS Wavefront-based refraction measurement results are highly repeatable and precise for astigmatic components. Noncycloplegic measurements of M show a systematic bias of 0.55 D. Cycloplegia reduces the propensity to accommodate by a factor of 2.4; for noncycloplegic repeated measurements, accommodation is controlled to a total interval of 1.49 D (95%). Without cycloplegia, results improve drastically when measurements are repeated.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1538-9235
,
1040-5488
DOI:
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001444
Language:
English
Publisher:
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2083924-8
Permalink
