GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)  (2)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), Vol. 117, No. Special_Suppl ( 2012-12), p. 31-37
    Abstract: The authors conducted validity testing of the 5 major reported indices for radiosurgically treated brain metastases— the original Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA), the Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (SIR), the Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBM), the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), and the subclassification of RPA Class II proposed by Yamamoto—in nearly 2500 cases treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS), focusing on the preservation of neurological function as well as the traditional endpoint of overall survival. Methods The authors analyzed data from 2445 cases treated with GKS by the first author (T.S.), the primary surgeon. The patient group consisted of 1716 patients treated between January 1998 and March 2008 (the Chiba series) and 729 patients treated between April 2008 and December 2011 (the Tokyo series). The interval from the date of GKS until the date of the patient's death (overall survival) and impaired activities of daily living (qualitative survival) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, while the absolute risk for two adjacent classes of each grading system and both hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results For overall survival, there were highly statistically significant differences between each two adjacent patient groups characterized by class or score (all p values 〈 0.001), except for GPA Scores 3.5–4.0 and 3.0. The SIR showed the best statistical results for predicting preservation of neurological function. Although no other grading systems yielded statistically significant differences in qualitative survival, the BSBM and the modified RPA appeared to be better than the original RPA and GPA. Conclusions The modified RPA subclassification, proposed by Yamamoto, is well balanced in scoring simplicity with respect to case number distribution and statistical results for overall survival. However, a new or revised grading system is necessary for predicting qualitative survival and for selecting the optimal treatment for patients with brain metastasis treated by GKS.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3085 , 1933-0693
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026156-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), Vol. 121, No. Suppl_2 ( 2014-12), p. 35-43
    Abstract: The Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBM) proposed by Lorenzoni and colleagues is one of the best grading systems for predicting survival periods after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. However, it includes no brain factors and cannot predict neurological outcomes, such as preservation of neurological function and prevention of neurological death. Herein, the authors propose a modified BSBM, adding 4 brain factors to the original BSBM, enabling prediction of neurological outcomes, as well as of overall survival, in patients undergoing SRS. Methods To serve as neurological prognostic scores (NPSs), the authors scored 4 significant brain factors for both preservation of neurological function (qualitative survival) and prevention of neurological death (neurological survival) as 0 or 1 as described in the following: 〉 10 brain tumors = 0 or ≤ 10 = 1, total tumor volume 〉 15 cm 3 = 0 or ≤ 15 cm 3 = 1, MRI findings of localized meningeal dissemination (yes = 0 or no = 1), and neurological symptoms (yes = 0 or no = 1). According to the sum of NPSs, patients were classified into 2 subgroups: Subgroup A with a total NPS of 3 or 4 and Subgroup B with an NPS of 0, 1, or 2. The authors defined the modified BSBM according to the NPS subgroup classification applied to the original BSBM groups. The validity of this modified BSBM in 2838 consecutive patients with brain metastases treated with SRS was verified. Results Patients included 1868 with cancer of the lung (including 1604 with non–small cell lung cancer), 355 of the gastrointestinal tract, 305 of the breast, 176 of the urogenital tract, and 134 with other cancers. Subgroup A had 2089 patients and Subgroup B 749. Median overall survival times were 2.6 months in BSBM 0 (382 patients), 5.7 in BSBM 1 (1143), 11.4 in BSBM 2 (1011) and 21.7 in BSBM 3 (302), and pairwise differences between the BSBM groups were statistically significant (all p 〈 0.0001). One-year qualitative survival rates were 64.6% (modified BSBM 0A, 204 patients), 45.0% (0B, 178), 82.5% (1A, 825), 63.3% (1B, 318), 86.4% (2A, 792), 73.7% (2B, 219), 91.4% (3A, 268), and 73.5% (3B, 34). One-year neurological survival rates were 82.6% (0A), 52.4% (0B), 90.5% (1A), 78.1% (1B), 91.1% (2A), 83.2% (2B), 93.9% (3A), and 76.3% (3B), where A and B identify the subgroup. Statistically significant differences in both qualitative and neurological survivals between Subgroups A and B were detected in all BSBM groups. Conclusions The authors' new index, the modified BSBM, was found to be excellent for predicting neurological outcomes, independently of life expectancy, in SRS-treated patients with brain metastases.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3085 , 1933-0693
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026156-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...