GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • JCDR Research and Publications  (3)
  • 1
    In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, JCDR Research and Publications, ( 2022)
    Abstract: Introduction: Rising morbidty resulting from Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is an emerging public health concern. The estimated prevalence of OSA in India has been investigated. STOP-Bang and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) have proven beneficial in identifying sleep breathing disorder. Validity of these questionnaire has been verified against polysomnography in many studies. Aim: To assess the predictive ability of STOP-Bang questionnaire and ESS in identifying OSA and comparing their efficacy with polysomnography. Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India, from January 2020 to June 2021, among 100 patients with symptoms of OSA. The STOP-Bang questionnaires were administered to the patients, and scoring was done, followed by overnight attended polysomnography. The normality of data was tested by Shapiro Wilk’s test. The values obtained were statistically analysed and to compare the parameters between groups and with in groups for normal data parametric test One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD test, for intragroup Paired t-test. Results: Mean age of the study population was 49.46±6.523 years, 79 were males and 21 females. Total, 79% of the subjects were males, and 21% of the study subjects were females. Among the 100, 65% had OSA as per polysomnography. STOP-Bang questionnaire had a higher sensitivity as compared to ESS in predicting OSA (75.38% for STOP-Bang and 72.31% for ESS). Conversely, the specificity of ESS (82.8%) was found to be greater than STOP-Bang (45.71%). Similar results were obtained for positive predictive value, in which ESS scored 88.6% while STOP-Bang scored 50%. For negative predictive values, ESS again scored higher (65%) than STOP-Bang (61.7%). Similarly, the Likelihood Ratio for a positive result (LR+) of ESS was greater than STOP-Bang (4.2 and 1.3 respectively). The STOP-Bang questionnaire, however, had higher Likelihood Ratio for a negative test (LR-) as compared to ESS (0.5 and 0.3 respectively). Conclusion: Polysomnography is the gold standard to diagnose OSA. For screening OSA, patients with symptoms of sleep disordered breathing, this study found that STOP-Bang questionnaire is better in identifying OSA as compared to ESS.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2249-782X
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JCDR Research and Publications
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2775283-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, JCDR Research and Publications, ( 2023)
    Abstract: Introduction: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is traditionally evaluated using a diagnostic Polysomnography (PSG) which is then followed by a PSG with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) titration. Split Night PSG (SN-PSG) includes the diagnostic and titration study in a single night. Split Night PSG is a better technique however, the requirements for CPAP titration are too strict. Aim: To assess the accuracy of different duration of split night compared to a Full Night PSG (FN-PSG) in OSA Syndrome. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine at VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, from January 2019 to May 2019 at Safdarjung Hospital was done. Apnoea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was assessed at the 1 hour, 2 hour, 3 hour and 4 hour from analysis of SN-PSG data obtained from FN-PSG. Using the Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve, it was compared to the FN-PSG. Calculations were made to validate the diagnosis by a 2 hour PSG using different AHI cut-off points (5/hour to 15/hour). Results: Data from 20 PSG recordings was processed. A stronger correlation of FN-AHI was demonstrated with AHI at 2 hour (p-value 〈 0.0001) (r value=0.902). At 2 hours of study, with an AHI cut-off of 5 hour, the sensitivity and specificity was 92.9% and 83.3%, respectively. The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 100% and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 83.3% (AUROC=0.976; p-value 〈 0.0001). At 2 hours, AHI cutoff of 15 hour, the sensitivity and specificity was 71.4% and 100%, respectively. The PPV was 100% and NPV was 86.7% (AUROC=1.000; p-value 〈 0.0001). Conclusion: Split-night PSG is effective for diagnosing severe OSA. A lower cut-off of AHI may be used to qualify patients for CPAP titration.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2249-782X
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JCDR Research and Publications
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2775283-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, JCDR Research and Publications, ( 2019)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2249-782X
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JCDR Research and Publications
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2775283-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...