GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Georg Thieme Verlag KG  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • Georg Thieme Verlag KG  (2)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Georg Thieme Verlag KG ; 2016
    In:  Thrombosis and Haemostasis Vol. 115, No. 01 ( 2016-01), p. 176-183
    In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 115, No. 01 ( 2016-01), p. 176-183
    Abstract: The spleen is a crucial organ in humans. However, little is known about the association of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with splenic injury and splenectomy in trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine the subsequent risk of VTE following splenic injury and splenectomy. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted by analysing data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We included 6,162 splenic injury patients (3,033 splenectomised and 3,129 nonsplenectomised patients) and 24,648 comparison patients who were selected by frequency match based on sex, age, and the index year during 2000–2006. All patients were followed until the occurrence of VTE, 31 December, 2011, death, or withdrawal from the insurance program. The age of patients with splenic injury was 41.93 ± 16.44 years. The incidence rates of VTE were 11.81, 8.46, and 5.21 per 10,000 person-years in the splenic injury patients with splen -ectomy, splenic injury patients without splenectomy, and comparison patients, respectively. Compared with the comparison cohort, splenic injury patients with splenectomy exhibited a 2.21-fold risk of VTE (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.43–3.43), whereas those without splenectomy exhibited a 1.71-fold risk of VTE (95 % CI, 1.05–2.80). The overall incidence rate of VTE was 1.97-fold higher in the splenic injury cohort than the comparison cohort (95 % CI, 1.38–2.81). Although splenectomy increased the risk of VTE 1.35-fold compared with no splenectomy, the difference was not statistically significant (95 % CI, 0.74–2.45). These results may alert physicians and patients to the complications of splenic injury and splenectomy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0340-6245 , 2567-689X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2016
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Georg Thieme Verlag KG ; 2017
    In:  Endoscopy Vol. 49, No. 08 ( 2017-08), p. 754-764
    In: Endoscopy, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 49, No. 08 ( 2017-08), p. 754-764
    Abstract: Background and study aims Previous studies describing the incidence of infection after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are limited. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of infection, and to propose a nomogram to predict the probability of infection following colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in symptomatic patients. Patients and methods A nationwide retrospective study was conducted by analyzing the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The incidence of infection within 30 days after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy was assessed and compared with a control group matched at a ratio of 1:1 based on age, sex, and the date of examination. Results  In all, 112 543 patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and 112 543 matched patients who did not undergo these procedures were included. The overall incidence of infection within 30 days after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy was 0.37 %, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.04 %; P  〈  0.001). Diverticulitis, peritonitis, and appendicitis were the most common infections. Patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy had a 9.38-fold risk of infection (95 % confidence interval, 6.81 – 12.93; P  〈  0.001) compared with the control group. The predicted infection-free rates of the nomogram were closely aligned with the actual infection-free rates, with a bootstrapping concordance index of 0.763. Conclusions Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are associated with an increased risk of infection, which may occur after these procedures. Our nomogram may provide clinicians with an easy tool to evaluate the risk of infection after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in symptomatic patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0013-726X , 1438-8812
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026213-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...