GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Frontiers in Endocrinology, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 13 ( 2022-5-3)
    Abstract: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) aggregate the effects of genetic variants across the genome and are used to predict risk of complex diseases, such as obesity. Current PRSs only include common variants (minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥1%), whereas the contribution of rare variants in PRSs to predict disease remains unknown. Here, we examine whether augmenting the standard common variant PRS (PRS common ) with a rare variant PRS (PRS rare ) improves prediction of obesity. We used genome-wide genotyped and imputed data on 451,145 European-ancestry participants of the UK Biobank, as well as whole exome sequencing (WES) data on 184,385 participants. We performed single variant analyses (for both common and rare variants) and gene-based analyses (for rare variants) for association with BMI (kg/m 2 ), obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), and extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ). We built PRSs common and PRSs rare using a range of methods (Clumping+Thresholding [C+T], PRS-CS, lassosum, gene-burden test). We selected the best-performing PRSs and assessed their performance in 36,757 European-ancestry unrelated participants with whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program. The best-performing PRS common explained 10.1% of variation in BMI, and 18.3% and 22.5% of the susceptibility to obesity and extreme obesity, respectively, whereas the best-performing PRS rare explained 1.49%, and 2.97% and 3.68%, respectively. The PRS rare was associated with an increased risk of obesity and extreme obesity (OR obesity = 1.37 per SD PRS , P obesity = 1.7x10 -85 ; OR extremeobesity = 1.55 per SD PRS , P extremeobesity = 3.8x10 -40 ), which was attenuated, after adjusting for PRS common (OR obesity = 1.08 per SD PRS , P obesity = 9.8x10 -6 ; OR extremeobesity = 1.09 per SD PRS , P extremeobesity = 0.02). When PRS rare and PRS common are combined, the increase in explained variance attributed to PRS rare was small (incremental Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.24% for obesity and 0.51% for extreme obesity). Consistently, combining PRS rare to PRS common provided little improvement to the prediction of obesity (PRS rare AUC = 0.591; PRS common AUC = 0.708; PRS combined AUC = 0.710). In summary, while rare variants show convincing association with BMI, obesity and extreme obesity, the PRS rare provides limited improvement over PRS common in the prediction of obesity risk, based on these large populations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1664-2392
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2592084-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Frontiers in Medicine, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 7 ( 2021-1-18)
    Abstract: Women worldwide are two to three times more likely to suffer from depression in their lifetime than are men. Female risk for depressive symptoms is particularly high during the reproductive years between menarche and menopause. The term “Reproductive Mood Disorders” refers to depressive disorders triggered by hormonal fluctuations during reproductive transitions including the perimenarchal phase, the pre-menstrual phase, pregnancy, the peripartum period and the perimenopausal transition. Here we focus on reproductive mood disorders manifesting in adult life. We propose a research agenda that draws together several reproductive mood disorders and investigates which genetic, endocrinological, neural, and psychosocial factors can explain depressive symptoms during phases of hormonal transitions in women. Based on current research it is assumed that some women experience an increased sensitivity to not only fluctuations in reproductive steroids (estrogen and progesterone), but also stress-related steroids. We integrate both dynamics into the concept of “steroid hormone sensitivity,” expanding on the concept of “reproductive hormone sensitivity.” We suggest that a differential response of the stress steroid system including corticosteroids, neurosteroids, like allopregnanolone and the GABA-A Receptor complex, as well as a differential (epi)genetic risk in serotonergic and GABAergic signaling, are moderators or mediators between changes in the reproductive steroid system and the physiological, affective, and cognitive outcomes manifesting in reproductive mood disorders. We point to the lack of research on the role of psychosocial factors in increasing a woman's stress level and at some point also the sensitivity of her stress steroid system within the etiology of Reproductive Mood Disorders. Drawing together the evidence on various reproductive mood disorders we seek to present a basis for the development of more effective pharmacological, social, and psychological treatment interventions and prevention strategies for women susceptible to these disorders. This could pave the way for new research as well as medical and psychological teaching and practice- such as a new type of Practice for Gynecological Psychoneuroendocrinology- with the aim of working on and ultimately offering more integrative forms of support not yet available to women suffering from depression during hormonal transitions. In medical history women have been left alone with this integrative challenge.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2296-858X
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2775999-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...