In:
The Psychiatrist, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 37, No. 10 ( 2013-10), p. 313-314
Abstract:
The experience of rejection of an article submitted for publication to a scientific journal can be particularly anxiety provoking, especially when the furtherance of an academic career or the gaining of a permanent post might be riding on getting it published. Many papers fail to get past the first hurdle and are not sent out for peer review, often as a result of the most basic of errors: the results are not generalisable, the paper adds nothing new to the subject, there are flaws in the study design or inappropriate statistics were used. Attention paid to formulating a clear research question and the adoption at the outset of a doable, interesting project will often help to avoid disappointment.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1758-3209
,
1758-3217
DOI:
10.1192/pb.bp.113.044784
Language:
English
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Publication Date:
2013
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2533085-8
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2816886-0
Permalink