GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (1)
Material
Publisher
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (1)
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2019
    In:  Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Vol. 13, No. 02 ( 2019-04), p. 301-308
    In: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 13, No. 02 ( 2019-04), p. 301-308
    Abstract: This study examined differences in learning outcomes among newborn intensive care unit (NICU) workers who underwent virtual reality simulation (VRS) emergency evacuation training versus those who received web-based clinical updates (CU). Learning outcomes included a) knowledge gained, b) confidence with evacuation, and c) performance in a live evacuation exercise. Methods A longitudinal, mixed-method, quasi-experimental design was implemented utilizing a sample of NICU workers randomly assigned to VRS training or CUs. Four VRS scenarios were created that augmented neonate evacuation training materials. Learning was measured using cognitive assessments, self-efficacy questionnaire (baseline, 0, 4, 8, 12 months), and performance in a live drill (baseline, 12 months). Data were collected following training and analyzed using mixed model analysis. Focus groups captured VRS participant experiences. Results The VRS and CU groups did not statistically differ based upon the scores on the Cognitive Assessment or perceived self-efficacy. The virtual reality group performance in the live exercise was statistically ( P & lt;.0001) and clinically (effect size of 1.71) better than that of the CU group. Conclusions Training using VRS is effective in promoting positive performance outcomes and should be included as a method for disaster training. VRS can allow an organization to train, test, and identify gaps in current emergency operation plans. In the unique case of disasters, which are low-volume and high-risk events, the participant can have access to an environment without endangering themselves or clients. ( Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:301–308)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1935-7893 , 1938-744X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2375268-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...