GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery  (3)
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ; 2014
    In:  The Bone & Joint Journal Vol. 96-B, No. 9 ( 2014-09), p. 1222-1226
    In: The Bone & Joint Journal, British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 96-B, No. 9 ( 2014-09), p. 1222-1226
    Abstract: We identified a group of patients from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register who reported no relief of pain or worse pain one year after a total knee replacement (TKR). A total of two different patient-reported pain scores were used during this process. We then evaluated how the instruments used to measure pain affected the number of patients who reported no relief of pain or worse pain, and the relative effect of potential risk factors. Between 2008 and 2010, 2883 TKRs were performed for osteoarthritis in two Swedish arthroplasty units. After applying exclusion criteria, 2123 primary TKRs (2123 patients) were included in the study. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for knee pain were used to assess patients pre-operatively and one year post-operatively. Only 50 of the 220 patients (23%) who reported no pain relief on either the KOOS pain subscale or the VAS for knee pain did so with both of these instruments. Patients who reported no pain relief on either measure tended to have less pain pre-operatively but a higher degree of anxiety. Charnley category C was a predictor for not gaining pain relief as measured on a VAS for knee pain. The number of patients who are not relieved of pain after a TKR differs considerably depending on the instrument used to measure pain. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1222–6.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2049-4394 , 2049-4408
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2697480-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ; 2014
    In:  Bone & Joint Research Vol. 3, No. 7 ( 2014-07), p. 217-222
    In: Bone & Joint Research, British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 3, No. 7 ( 2014-07), p. 217-222
    Abstract: We are entering a new era with governmental bodies taking an increasingly guiding role, gaining control of registries, demanding direct access with release of open public information for quality comparisons between hospitals. This review is written by physicians and scientists who have worked with the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) periodically since it began. It reviews the history of the register and describes the methods used and lessons learned. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:217–22.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2046-3758
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2669244-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ; 2023
    In:  Orthopaedic Proceedings Vol. 105-B, No. SUPP_12 ( 2023-6-23), p. 87-87
    In: Orthopaedic Proceedings, British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 105-B, No. SUPP_12 ( 2023-6-23), p. 87-87
    Abstract: In 1975, Sweden started registering primary knee replacement surgeries based on the personal identity number. Individual-based registrations of primary total hip replacements started in 1992 and for hemiarthroplasties the registration started in 2006. The completeness of these registrations is estimated at 98% during the last 10-year period. The long history and high completeness allow for accurate calculations of population-based prevalence of joint replacement and trends over time. We used all data on primary joint replacements available in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. The prevalence was calculated using number of alive patients with 1) at least one joint replacement 2) at least one hip replacement 3) at least one knee replacement at the end of each year from 2010 – 2021. Publicly available population numbers were retrieved from Statistics Sweden. We calculated total prevalence and prevalence per age in years. By the end of 2021, 3.2% of the Swedish population had at least one hip or knee replacement. This was an increase from 2.5% in 2010. Among 80-year-old, the prevalence was 17.5% for any joint replacement. For both hip and knee replacement and all ages, the prevalence was higher for women. For knee replacement, the 2021 prevalence peaked at the age of 89 (9,4%) while the prevalence continuously increased with age for hip replacements. A considerable proportion of the Swedish elderly population is living with at least one hip or knee replacement. The prevalence has increased during the last 12-year period for both hips and knees. An increasing prevalence may also affect the incidence of fractures and infections. Knowledge about the prevalence is fundamental for planning future demand for primary and revision hip and knee replacement.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1358-992X , 2049-4416
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Publication Date: 2023
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...