GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • BMJ  (3)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, BMJ, Vol. 90, No. e7 ( 2019-07), p. A1.3-A2
    Abstract: DBS can improve motor deficit in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. Existing devices have limitations due to electrode positioning errors, fallible manual programming and delivery of continuous ‘open-loop’ stimulation despite fluctuating patient state. This results in partial efficacy, adverse effects and increased cost. One solution is to use an electrical feedback signal or ‘biomarker’ recorded from DBS electrodes. The most widely studied signal has been spontaneous local field potentials (LFPs), particularly beta band (13–30 Hz) and high frequency oscillations (HFO) (200–400 Hz). Here, we report a novel biomarker in the form of a large amplitude, evoked potential, with a characteristic oscillatory decay, termed evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA). 1 Methods LFPs and ERNA were recorded in 14 patients with PD (28 hemispheres) undergoing STN DBS surgery. The four contacts in each electrode array were ranked according to ERNA amplitude, beta power, HFO power and proximity to the anatomically ideal stimulation location. At least 3 months after surgery, motor scores (UPDRS III, reaction time) were evaluated off-DBS and during stimulation delivered through each electrode contact in a randomised order. Results ERNA amplitude, beta power and contact proximity to the anatomically ideal stimulation location predicted magnitude of therapeutic response to DBS. However, after exclusion of covariance, ERNA amplitude remained the only significant predictor of DBS response. Conclusion ERNA is a readily recordable, large amplitude signal that accurately correlates with motor response to DBS. It holds significant potential as a biomarker for guiding electrode implantation, ideal contact selection, automated parameter fitting and delivery of closed-loop DBS. Reference Sinclair NC, McDermott HJ, Bulluss KJ, Fallon JB, Perera T, Xu SS, et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation evokes resonant neural activity. Annals of neurology 2018;83(5).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3050 , 1468-330X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1480429-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    BMJ ; 1960
    In:  BMJ Vol. 1, No. 5168 ( 1960-01-23), p. 231-238
    In: BMJ, BMJ, Vol. 1, No. 5168 ( 1960-01-23), p. 231-238
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8138 , 1468-5833
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 1960
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1479799-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, BMJ
    Abstract: Selecting the ideal contact to apply subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson’s disease is time-consuming and reliant on clinical expertise. The aim of this cohort study was to assess whether neuronal signals (beta oscillations and evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA)), and the anatomical location of electrodes, can predict the contacts selected by long-term, expert-clinician programming of STN-DBS. Methods We evaluated 92 hemispheres of 47 patients with Parkinson’s disease receiving chronic monopolar and bipolar STN-DBS. At each contact, beta oscillations and ERNA were recorded intraoperatively, and anatomical locations were assessed. How these factors, alone and in combination, predicted the contacts clinically selected for chronic deep brain stimulation at 6 months postoperatively was evaluated using a simple-ranking method and machine learning algorithms. Results The probability that each factor individually predicted the clinician-chosen contact was as follows: ERNA 80%, anatomy 67%, beta oscillations 50%. ERNA performed significantly better than anatomy and beta oscillations. Combining neuronal signal and anatomical data did not improve predictive performance. Conclusion This work supports the development of probability-based algorithms using neuronal signals and anatomical data to assist programming of deep brain stimulation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3050 , 1468-330X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1480429-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...