GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (2)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 3698-3698
    Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Proteasome inhibitors (PI) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have demonstrated synergistic pre-clinical activity in multiple myeloma (MM). The goals of this study were to evaluate this combination regimen’s clinical activity and adverse events, including thrombocytopenia (TCP) since both drug classes may cause transient TCP. We performed an open label, single-centre, single-arm, phase I/II, dose-escalation trial of bortezomib, dexamethasone and romidepsin (depsipeptide) in relapsed or refractory MM. This is the first clinical trial to combine these 3 agents. METHODS. All patients (pts) received bortezomib (1.3mg/m2 d1, 4, 8, 11) with dexamethasone (20mg d1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12). Romidepsin commenced at 8 mg/m2 IV d1, 8, and 15 every 28 days with a planned accelerated intra-patient dose escalation to 10, 12 and 14 mg/m2 (n=10). After CR + 2 cycles or a maximum of 8 cycles, pts with SD or better commenced maintenance (Mx) therapy, romidepsin at the MTD on days 1 and 8 of a 28 day cycle until PD. An additional 15 pts were treated at the MTD in a phase II expansion. Response was assessed after every 2 cycles according to IMWG criteria (with minimal Response (MR) defined as ≥25% but 〈 50% reduction in M protein). Toxicities were assessed using NCI-CTCAE version 3. RESULTS: In total, 25 pts have been enrolled of which 18 have completed more than 2 cycles and are evaluable for response. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (2–5). Most pts were treated previously with autologous stem cell transplantation (n=11) and neurotoxic regimens; VAD (n=10), thalidomide (n=12), bortezomib (n=6) and lenalidomide (n=4). The median number of treatment cycles delivered was 4 (1–8); Mx cycles 6 (3–15). 10 patients entered the Phase 1 study. No DLTs occurred at 8mg/m2 (n=1) or 10mg/m2 (n=6) of romidepsin. At 12mg/m2 (n=3), TCP (Grade 4, n=3), febrile neutropenia (n=1), peripheral neuropathy (PN) (n=1) and constipation (n=1) DLTs were observed. Of note, 2 pts with Grade 4 TCP had platelets 50–100×109/L before commencing therapy. The MTD for this regimen was determined as romidepsin (10mg/m2) with bortezomib (1.3mg/m2). Other drug-related toxicities observed included: Grade 3: fatigue (n=2), neutropaenia (n=1), sepsis (n=2), PN (n=1); Grade 2: PN (n=6), nausea (n=1). Five pts required bortezomib dose reductions because of PN (n=4). Two pts required a romidepsin dose reduction because of fatigue (n=1) and abnormal LFTs (n=1). The overall response rate (ORR) is 12/18 (67%) (4 CR/nCR, 4 VGPR, 4 PR) with an additional 5 (28%) patients achieving an MR. To date, 7 patients have entered the romi Mx phase. Pt numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 been on Mx for 15, 3, 12, 8, 7, 4, and 5 months respectively. Four pts have progressed after C1 (n=2), C4 (n=1) and C8+3Mx (n=1). Of note, 3 pts have entered this trial having progressed on a separate trial examining bortezomib maintenance therapy (study protocol PMCC 05/69). These 3 pts were receiving 2 weekly bortezomib and progressing. On the introduction of bortezomib/dexamethasone/romidepsin, the M band has fallen in all assessable pts [41 to 26 (C2); 16 to 11 (C2); 1 pt has not completed C1]. CONCLUSION. This combination of a bortezomib and dexamethasone with romidepsin is well tolerated, with similar TCP compared to single agent bortezomib and romidepsin and demonstrates substantial efficacy in a heavily pre-treated group of patients. The high response rate (OR 67% + 28% MR), impressive depth of response (44% CR + VGPR), durable responses and the observation of a drop in M band in pts progressing on bortezomib as their immediate prior therapy, all indicate that romidepsin has synergistic activity with bortezomib-dexamethasone.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 3066-3066
    Abstract: Among patients (pts) with indolent lymphoproliferative disorders prior fludarabine (F) exposure is a risk factor for impaired PBSC mobilization. In a previous report of pts with prior F therapy (Leuk 18:1034Leuk 18:2004) only 14/41 pts (34%) achieved PBSC yields of ≥2 x 106/kg from first mobilization using G-CSF (median 10 μg/kg/d) ± chemotherapy with highly variable timing of pheresis and moderate infectious morbidity. Given the synergy between G-CSF and SCF we hypothesized that SCF plus high-dose bd G-CSF would improve mobilization efficacy with more predictable timing of collections. Methods: Ancestim (r-metHuSCF) 20 μg/kg/day sc was given from d1, G-CSF 12 μg/kg/bd sc from d4. Apheresis was scheduled from d6, provided PB CD34+ count was ≥3 x 106/L. Pts from the previous study served as historical controls. The study had 80% power to detect an increase in successful mobilization to 65%. Results: 35 pts were recruited and all are evaluable; median age 54 yrs (range 31–66), 66% male, 43% had CLL or PLL, 57% indolent NHL, similar to the historical cohort (p 〉 0.05), and the median cumulative prior F dose of 660 (405–900) mg, was greater than the historical cohort (median 300 mg; p 〈 0.0005). All study pts had received F in combination, usually cyclophosphamide and rituximab, with a median of 7 months (range 2–18) from last F-exposure. 69% of pts were in CR at the time of mobilization and 77% had no evidence of marrow infiltration, with 20% having mild to severely hypocellular marrow morphology. There were no severe adverse events, with 43% of pts having Gr 1–2 bone pain and 40% mild injection site reactions. 24 pts commenced apheresis as scheduled on d6, the reminder on d7–8. 22 pts (63%) collected ≥2.0 x 106/kg PBSC (“success”) (p=0.021 vs controls) with a median CD34+ yield overall of 2.3 x 106/kg (0.53–8.97) from a median of 4 (2–6) aphereses. Pts with a PB CD34+ count of 〉 4.5 x 106/L on the first day of apheresis had a 74% likelihood of achieving successful collection. We had previously reported that pts aged 〉 50 yrs have a lower PBSC collection success, and adjusting for age the study pts were more frequently successfully mobilized ( 〈 50 yrs; 75% vs 53%. ≥50 yrs; 57% vs 18%; p=0.0085 adjusted for age). In contrast to prior reports, we found higher success rates with a shorter time elapsed since last F exposure [ 〈 6 Mo (89%), 6–9 Mo (63%), 〉 9 Mo (40%); p=0.035]. In multivariate analysis, the only baseline factors associated with greater mobilization success were a shorter interval from last F-exposure and a lower cumulative chemotherapy toxicity score (Br J Haem 98:745, 1997). After adjusting for these factors, the use of the SCF and high-dose bd G-CSF schedule was still associated with a higher likelihood of mobilization success (p=0.005). Conclusions: The regimen of SCF and bd high-dose G-CSF shows greater PBSC mobilization efficacy in pts previously treated with F than more commonly used strategies such as G-CSF alone or cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, with good tolerance, predictable kinetics and no infectious morbidity. These data make this combined growth-factor mobilization strategy the preferred PBSC method for pts previously treated with F at our institution.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...