GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (2)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 2211-2211
    Abstract: Introduction: Patients with hematological cancers treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after myeloablative conditioning are at risk of malnutrition due to inadequate energy intake. This may cause or contribute to adverse outcomes. The best way to prevent and treat malnutrition and optimize nutritional status in these patients, remains unknown. We therefore conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of an individualized nutritional intervention to optimize energy intake, on quality of life (QoL), severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and severe oral mucositis 3 months after allo-SCT. Methods: One-hundred and seventy-one patients were eligible for the trial, of whom 117 (68%) agreed to participate and were randomized to either the intervention- (n=57) or control (n=60) group. As the primary outcome we determined QoL using the 2 item-global QoL/health of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire-30. Secondary outcomes were (i) the prevalence of aGVHD grades 3 and 4 diagnosed according to the modified Glucksberg criteria; and (ii) the prevalence and (iii) the number of days with oral mucositis. The goal of the intervention was to supply a daily minimum of 30 kcal/kg body weight from the day the patients commenced the conditioning regime and until discharge. Oral intake was monitored daily during the entire hospital stay. In addition to regular food, the intervention group also received energy-dense and low-lactose oral supplements while in hospital. A nasojejunal tube was inserted within day 5 after allo-SCT. If the energy needs were not met orally or tube feeding was not tolerated, these patients received additional parenteral nutrition. Prior to discharge the intervention group received dietary advices to optimize their nutrient- and energy intake. In the control group oral intake was not monitored while hospitalized, tube feeding was not given and a standard amount of parenteral nutrition was administered only if necessary. Three months after allo-SCT energy intake per body weight was calculated for both study groups using one-day unweighted dietary records. The study was registered in Clinical Trials (NCT01181076). Results: Median age (n=117) at inclusion was 44 (range 18 - 65) years and 61% were males. The compliance with the intervention during hospital stay (median length 36 days, range 19-93 days) was high: The median energy intake in the intervention group was of 31.2 (14.4 - 42.9) kcal/kg corresponding to about 100% of the target of 30 kcal/kg. Three months after allo-SCT energy intake was available from 72 patients. The intervention group (n=36) had a median daily energy intake of 30.0 (7.7 - 65.0) kcal/kg, whereas the corresponding value was 26.7 (9.3-75.9) kcal/kg in the control group (n=36; p=0.84). A total of 88/117 (75%) patients were eligible for analysis of global QoL scores (40 in the intervention- and 48 in the control group) 3 months after allo-HSCT. The remaining 29 patients had either died (intervention group n= 9, control group n=5), relapsed (intervention group n=4, control group n=3), or had not returned the QoL questionnaire (intervention group n=4, control group n=4). The mean difference in global QoL between the intervention- and control group was not significant: 2.7 (95% CI -7.7 to 13.2; p=0.60; intervention group mean -11.7, SD 24.1; control group mean -14.4, SD 24.8). A total of 117 patients were included in the analyses of aGVHD and oral mucositis. Twenty patients were diagnosed with aGVHD grades 3 and 4 (intervention group n=8, control group n=12), yielding an odds ratio of 0.65 (95% CI 0.25 to1.74; p=0.39). Eighty-nine patients (intervention group n=43, control group n=46) were diagnosed with oral mucositis grades 3 and 4, yielding an odds ratio of 0.93 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.19; p=0.88). The mean difference in number of days with oral mucositis grades 3 and 4 between the intervention- and control group was not significant: -0.55 (95% CI -1.92 to 0.81; p=0.42). Conclusion: In this first randomized controlled trial testing an individually tailored nutritional intervention in patients undergoing allo-SCT, we found no significant difference in global quality of life, prevalence of acute graft-versus-host disease, or prevalence or duration of oral mucositis 3 months after allo-SCT with myeloablative conditioning. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 102-102
    Abstract: Introduction In many patients diagnosed with a hematological malignancy, the disease cannot be totally eradicated by conventional therapeutic approaches, and for them allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative option. A major complication of allo-HSCT is graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), affecting about 50% of transplant recipients. In addition to increased risk of death and long-lasting debilitating conditions, severe GvHD also impairs health-related quality of life. High-dose systemic steroids is the first line treatment for GvHD, but treatment failure is common, and steroid-refractoriness is a major cause of non-relapse mortality after allo-HSCT. While there is no established second line GvHD-treatment, extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP) has emerged as an attractive and increasingly applied alternative, partly due to its favourable safety profile. However, the use of ECP in preventing GvHD is sparse and data are inconclusive due to lack of randomized controlled trials (RCT). We therefore conducted a RCT to study if ECP given post transplantation could prevent the development of GvHD. Methods Between June 2017 and February 2020, we enrolled 157 patients ( & gt; 18 years) diagnosed with a hematological malignancy and treated with an allo-HSCT in first remission into an intention-to-treat open RCT. Ethical and IRB approvals were granted, and the RCT was registered with Clinical Trials (ID NCT03204721). The sample size (76 in intervention group and 81 controls) was calculated based on a reduction of 25% in the total number of patients diagnosed with any form of GvHD within the first year of allo-HCST (primary end-point) as clinically relevant. The patients were stratified according to whether they received myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (Table 1), and they were given GvHD prophylaxis as shown in Table 1. ECP (Therakos Cellex ®, Mallinckrodt Pharm., NJ) was initiated when patients had engrafted (i.e. leukocytes & gt; 1 x 10 9/L and platelets & gt; 20 x 10 9/L), and, according to the study protocol, we planned for ECP on two consecutive days/week for two weeks, then weekly for four weeks to a total eight treatments for each patient in the intervention group. Chi-square test was used to test differences between the two study groups. Results Table 1 shows that patient characteristics were well balanced among the two study groups. Four patients did not receive ECP while 39 received all the eight treatments. One year after allo-HCST, the proportion of GvHD was 45/76 (59%) in the intervention group and 52/81 (64%) in the controls (p=0.52). There were no significant differences between the intervention and control group regarding development of acute (45% vs. 48%) or chronic (39% vs. 40%) GvHD. Neither did we detect any statistical differences between the two study groups regarding organ involvement or severity of the GvHD manifestations (data not shown). During the one-year observation period, 16/76 (21%) and 10/81 (12%) relapsed in the intervention and control group, respectively (p=0.14). The corresponding numbers of deaths were 12/76 (16%) and 16/81 (20%), respectively (p=0.52). Six patients in the intervention group experienced mild to moderate temporary, adverse events that could possibly be related to the ECP-procedure. Conclusion In this first RCT addressing ECP as GvHD prophylaxis in allo-HSCT for hematological malignancy, we found no significant difference in the numbers, types, organ involvement, or severity of GvHD between the intervention and the control group. Thus, our study does not support the use of ECP as an adjunct to GvHD-prophylaxis based on cyclosporine and methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, or sirolimus. However, ECP did not seem to be harmful in this setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...