Abstract: Relapsed myeloid disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains largely incurable. We previously demonstrated the potent activity of immune checkpoint blockade in this clinical setting with ipilimumab or nivolumab. To define the molecular and cellular pathways by which CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab can reinvigorate an effective graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response, we integrated transcriptomic analysis of leukemic biopsies with immunophenotypic profiling of matched peripheral blood samples collected from patients treated with ipilimumab following HSCT on the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network 9204 trial. Response to ipilimumab was associated with transcriptomic evidence of increased local CD8+ T-cell infiltration and activation. Systemically, ipilimumab decreased naïve and increased memory T-cell populations and increased expression of markers of T-cell activation and costimulation such as PD-1, HLA-DR, and ICOS, irrespective of response. However, responding patients were characterized by higher turnover of T-cell receptor sequences in peripheral blood and showed increased expression of proinflammatory chemokines in plasma that was further amplified by ipilimumab. Altogether, these data highlight the compositional T-cell shifts and inflammatory pathways induced by ipilimumab both locally and systemically that associate with successful GVL outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01822509.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutations are observed in 6-10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ivosidenib (AG-120), a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) protein, is a promising therapeutic candidate for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 AML. Through inhibition of mIDH1, ivosidenib suppresses the abnormal production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to clinical responses via differentiation of malignant cells. AIM: To report safety and efficacy data from the first-in-human phase 1 study of ivosidenib in patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies including relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML (NCT02074839). This is the first report of data from the 4 expansion cohorts, with a total of 258 patients treated on study. METHODS: The ongoing phase 1 study assesses the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib in mIDH1 hematologic malignancies. Enrollment was completed on May 8, 2017. During dose escalation, patients received ivosidenib as a single agent orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in 28-day cycles. The MTD was not reached and 500 mg QD was selected as the recommended dose to be tested in 4 expansion cohorts: R/R AML (Arms 1 and 4, where Arm 1 patients are those with relapse after transplantation, second or later relapse, resistance to initial induction or reinduction treatment, or relapse within 1 year of initial treatment, and Arm 4 patients have R/R AML but are not eligible for Arm 1); untreated AML (Arm 2); and other advanced hematologic malignancies including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (Arm 3). Updated safety data will be presented for all patients. Efficacy outcomes will be presented for all R/R AML patients treated at 500 mg QD across the dose escalation and expansion cohorts who received their first dose of ivosidenib at least 6 months prior to the analysis cut-off date of May 12, 2017, as well as for the poorest prognosis Arm 1 subset. Efficacy data for all treated patients from the other expansion cohorts (untreated AML and other advanced hematologic malignancies including MDS) will also be presented. RESULTS: In all, 258 patients (78 in dose escalation, 180 in expansion) were treated with ivosidenib. As of May 12, 2017, 62 of 258 (24%) patients were continuing on treatment. The median duration of exposure to ivosidenib was 3.5 months (range 0.1-33.5). Twenty-two (8.5%) patients discontinued treatment to proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Treatment was well tolerated; the most common adverse events (AEs) (n=258) of any grade irrespective of causality occurring in ≥20% of patients were diarrhea (33%), leukocytosis (30%), nausea (30%), fatigue (29%), febrile neutropenia (25%), dyspnea (24%), anemia (23%), QT prolongation (23%), peripheral edema (22%), pyrexia (21%), and decreased appetite (20%). The majority of these AEs were grades 1-2 and reported as unrelated to treatment. Differentiation syndrome (DS) was observed in 29 of 258 (11.2%) patients, including grade ≥3 DS in 14 (5.4%); study drug was held owing to DS in 11 patients (4.3%), and no instances of DS led to permanent treatment discontinuation or death. The primary efficacy endpoint for R/R AML is the CR+CRh rate, i.e., the rate of complete remission (CR according to modified IWG 2003 criteria plus CR with partial hematologic recovery, defined as CR except absolute neutrophil count & gt;0.5 × 109/L [500/µL] and platelet count & gt;50 × 109/L [50,000/µL]). Among 125 Arm 1 R/R AML patients receiving ivosidenib 500 mg QD across dose escalation and expansion who received their first dose at least 6 months prior to the analysis cutoff date, the CR+CRh rate was 30.4% (95% CI 22.5%, 39.3%), including CR in 27 (21.6%) and CRh in 11 (8.8%) patients. Median duration of CR+CRh was 8.2 months (95% CI 5.5, 12.0), and duration of CR was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.6, 18.3). The overall response rate (CR+CRi/CRp+PR+MLFS) was 41.6% (95% CI 32.9%, 50.8%) (52/125 patients). CONCLUSION: Ivosidenib monotherapy is well tolerated in patients with mIDH1 AML and other advanced hematologic malignancies. In a high-risk, molecularly defined R/R AML patient population with unmet medical need, ivosidenib induced durable remissions and improved patient outcomes. These findings support the role of ivosidenib as an effective, oral, targeted treatment for patients with mIDH1 AML. Disclosures DiNardo: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. De Botton: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stein: GSK: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Constellation Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roboz: AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Amphivena, Array Biopharma Inc., Astex, AstraZeneca, Celator, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, CTI BioPharma, Genoptix, Immune Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Juno, MedImmune, MEI Pharma, Novartis, Onconova, Pfizer, Roche Pharmace: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding. Mims: Novartis: Honoraria. Pollyea: Takeda, Ariad, Alexion, Celgene, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Jazz, Servier, Curis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios, Pfizer: Research Funding. Altman: Syros: Consultancy; NCCN: Other: Educational speaker; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Ceplene: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; ASH: Other: Educational speaker. Collins: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Mannis: Curis: Honoraria; Juno: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Uy: GlycoMimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel Suppport; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Fathi: Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medimmune: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy. Erba: Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Scientific Steering Committee , Speakers Bureau; Incyte: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy, Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; MacroGen: Consultancy; Ono: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Agios: Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Juno: Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Astellas: Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Celator: Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: all research support paid to University of Alabama, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee. Traer: ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Tolero: Consultancy; Notable Labs: Equity Ownership. Stuart: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Research Funding; Celator/Jazz: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Cantex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Arellano: Cephalon Oncology: Research Funding. Sekeres: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yen: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kapsalis: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goldwasser: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Attar: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stone: Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Fuji Film: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy; Ono: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy. Kantarjian: ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION Recurrent somatic mutations in the metabolic enzymes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) confer gain-of-function activity in cancer cells, resulting in accumulation of the oncometabolite, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). High levels of 2-HG result in epigenetic changes and impaired cellular differentiation. IDH mutations have been identified in multiple solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Approximately 6-10% and 9-13% of adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carry mutations in IDH1 (mIDH1) or IDH2 (mIDH2), respectively. AG-120 is a first-in-class, oral, potent, reversible, selective inhibitor of the IDH1 mutant enzyme under evaluation in multiple ongoing single agent and combination clinical trials [NCT02074839, NCT02073994, NCT02632708, NCT02677922]. This is the first report of IDH1 mutation clearance assessed by variant allele frequency (VAF) analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients treated on the dose escalation portion of the first-in-human phase 1 study [NCT02074839] . METHODS Patients with advanced mIDH1-positive hematologic malignancies received AG-120 as a single agent orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) continuously in 28-day cycles. Primary objectives were determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and selection of a dose schedule for expansion cohorts and future studies. Secondary objectives included clinical activity assessed by investigators using modified 2003 International Working Group Criteria in AML. Determination of mIDH1 VAF was performed using the FoundationOne® Heme test on mononuclear cells from the bone marrow or peripheral blood at screening and subsequent time points on study. This NGS assay reports IDH1 mutations for samples with VAF ≥1%, with median coverage 500X. Patients with IDH1 mutational clearance (IDH1-MC) were defined as having mIDH1 at baseline and at least one on-study sample with no reported mIDH1. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were treated in the dose escalation portion, which is now closed to enrollment. As of the data cut-off of May 12, 2016, the median duration on treatment was 3.2 months and 9 (11.5%) patients remain on treatment, with an additional 8 (10.3%) patients transitioned to stem cell transplant. Doses ranged from 300-1200 mg QD with 1 cohort at 100 mg BID. Though the MTD was not reached, the recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 500 mg QD. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 and 2, the most common (≥30%) being diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea; the most common grade ≥3 AEs (≥15%) were febrile neutropenia, anemia, leukocytosis and pneumonia. The most common serious AEs were febrile neutropenia (16.7%) and pneumonia (12.8%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 38.5% (n=30), with 17.9% (n=14) achieving a complete remission (CR). Longitudinal mIDH1 VAF data were available for 51 patients; of these, 22% (n=11) achieved a CR. IDH1-MC was observed in 27.3% (3/11) patients who achieved CR (Figure 1). In contrast, only 1/40 patients who did not achieve CR experienced IDH1-MC. This occurred in a patient with an initially low mIDH1 VAF who had clinical progression despite IDH1-MC (Figure 1, bottom right). In all 3 patients with CR who achieved IDH1-MC, an initial increase in mIDH1 VAF, or early peak, was observed prior to IDH1-MC, suggesting that early clonal expansion might have occurred as part of the mechanism of action of AG-120. CONCLUSION This is the first demonstration that treatment with single agent AG-120 can result in mIDH1 clearance as determined by NGS. Further analysis of the mutational profiles is planned. AG-120, a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of mIDH1 continues to demonstrate a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, and induced objective single-agent durable responses. The data continue to support the efficacy and safety of single agent AG-120 and provide evidence that the underlying biology of the disease is altered by treatment. Figure 1. VAF analysis using FoundationOne® Heme NGS assay in 4 AML patients with IDH1-MC treated with AG-120 Figure subscript: Y-axis is mIDH1 VAF, x-axis is days on treatment. Text indicates investigator-assessed clinical response. CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; *post-transplant sample Figure 1. VAF analysis using FoundationOne® Heme NGS assay in 4 AML patients with IDH1-MC treated with AG-120. / Figure subscript: Y-axis is mIDH1 VAF, x-axis is days on treatment. Text indicates investigator-assessed clinical response. CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; *post-transplant sample Disclosures DiNardo: Daiichi Sankyo: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. de Botton:Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy. Stein:Agios: Other: advisory board; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Other: advisory board. Roboz:Cellectis: Research Funding; Agios, Amgen, Amphivena, Astex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celator, Celgene, Genoptix, Janssen, Juno, MEI Pharma, MedImmune, Novartis, Onconova, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sunesis, Teva: Consultancy. Pollyea:Alexion: Other: advisory board; Pfizer: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Ariad: Other: advisory board; Glycomimetics: Other: DSMB member; Celgene: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Fathi:Bexalata: Other: Advisory Board participation; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board participation; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board participation, Research Funding; Merck: Other: Advisory Board participation; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Altman:Syros: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Foran:novartis: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; karyopharm: Honoraria; medscape: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. Pigneux:Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kantarjian:ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Liu:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Attar:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sacolick:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hurov:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Choe:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stone:Amgen: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy.

Abstract: Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an oral, targeted agent that suppresses production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate via inhibition of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; mIDH1) enzyme. From a phase 1 study of 258 patients with IDH1-mutant hematologic malignancies, we report results for 34 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for standard therapy who received 500 mg ivosidenib daily. Median age was 76.5 years, 26 patients (76%) had secondary AML, and 16 (47%) had received ≥1 hypomethylating agent for an antecedent hematologic disorder. The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (n = 18; 53%), fatigue (n = 16; 47%), nausea (n = 13; 38%), and decreased appetite (n = 12; 35%). Differentiation syndrome was reported in 6 patients (18%) (grade ≥3 in 3 [9%]) and did not require treatment discontinuation. Complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] , 25.5% to 60.8%); CR 30.3% (95% CI, 15.6% to 48.7%). Median durations of CR+CRh and CR were not reached, with 95% CI lower bounds of 4.6 and 4.2 months, respectively; 61.5% and 77.8% of patients remained in remission at 1 year. With median follow-up of 23.5 months (range, 0.6-40.9 months), median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 4.5-25.7). Of 21 transfusion-dependent patients (63.6%) at baseline, 9 (42.9%) became transfusion independent. IDH1 mutation clearance was seen in 9/14 patients achieving CR+CRh (5/10 CR; 4/4 CRh). Ivosidenib monotherapy was well-tolerated and induced durable remissions and transfusion independence in patients with newly diagnosed AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02074839.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations are seen in 6-10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ivosidenib (AG-120), an oral, potent, targeted inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 protein (mIDH1), is a therapeutic candidate for mIDH1 AML. Ivosidenib suppresses production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to clinical responses via differentiation of malignant cells. AIM: To determine the safety and efficacy of single-agent ivosidenib in patients with untreated AML enrolled in the first-in-human, phase 1, dose escalation and expansion study of patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT02074839). METHODS: This ongoing study assesses the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib. Enrollment completed on 08May2017. In dose escalation, patients received single-agent ivosidenib orally once daily (QD) or twice daily in 28-day cycles. MTD was not reached; 500 mg QD was selected as the dose for expansion cohorts. Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete hematologic or platelet recovery + partial response + morphologic leukemia-free state. CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) was defined as CR except absolute neutrophil count 〉 0.5 × 109/L [500/µL] and platelet count 〉 50 × 109/L [50,000/µL]). Exploratory biomarker assessments included baseline co-occurring mutations (next-generation sequencing panel for hematologic malignancies) and mIDH1 variant allele frequency (VAF) in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BEAMing Digital PCR; lower limit of detection for mIDH1, 0.02-0.04%). Here, we present data for all patients with untreated AML whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. RESULTS: In all, 258 patients (78 in dose escalation, 180 in expansion) received ivosidenib, including 34 patients with untreated AML (9 from dose escalation, 25 from expansion) who received ivosidenib 500 mg QD. Baseline characteristics for these 34 patients were: 19 male/15 female with median age 76.5 years (range 64-87); 56% were ≥75 years of age; 79% had secondary AML and 53% had prior MDS; 41% had ≥1 hypomethylating agent for antecedent hematologic disorder. As of 10Nov2017, 9 of 34 (26.5%) patients remained on treatment. Three (8.8%) patients discontinued treatment for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Median duration of exposure to ivosidenib was 4.3 months (range 0.3-29.1). Treatment was well tolerated; the most common adverse events (AEs) (n=34) of any grade, irrespective of causality, occurring in ≥20% of patients were diarrhea (50.0%), fatigue (44.1%), nausea (38.2%), decreased appetite (32.4%), leukocytosis (26.5%), anemia (26.5%), peripheral edema (26.5%), dyspnea (23.5%), thrombocytopenia (23.5%), hypomagnesemia (23.5%), constipation (20.6%), dizziness (20.6%), and insomnia (20.6%). The majority of AEs were grade 1-2 and reported as unrelated to treatment. IDH differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS) was seen in 6 of 34 (17.6%) patients, and was grade ≥3 in 3 (8.8%); ivosidenib was held due to IDH-DS in 3 patients (8.8%), but IDH-DS did not lead to permanent treatment discontinuation or death. CR rate was 26.5% (95% CI 12.9%, 44.4%), CR+CRh rate was 41.2% (95% CI 24.6%, 59.3%), and ORR 58.8% (95% CI 40.7%, 75.4%; 20/34 patients). Median durations of CR, CR+CRh, and overall response were not estimable (lower bound of 95% CI 4.2, 6.5, and 4.2 months, respectively); 12-month durations of response were 75.0%, 56.4%, and 54.3%, respectively. Of patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, 38.1% became transfusion independent for ≥56 consecutive days on treatment. Longitudinal mIDH1 VAF data were available for 23 patients with untreated AML in expansion: IDH1 mutation clearance was seen in 6 of 11 patients who achieved CR+CRh, including 3 of 7 patients with CR and 3 of 4 with CRh. The relationship between baseline co-occurring mutations and response will be presented. CONCLUSION: Ivosidenib monotherapy was well tolerated in patients with untreated mIDH1 AML, and induced durable remissions and transfusion independence in a molecularly defined, poor prognosis, elderly patient population with high rates of secondary AML, and prior hypomethylating agent exposure. These results support the role of ivosidenib as an effective, oral, targeted treatment for patients with untreated mIDH1 AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Disclosures Roboz: Argenx: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy. DiNardo:Karyopharm: Other: Advisory role; Medimmune: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory role; Bayer: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Stein:Agios: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. de Botton:Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mims:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy. Altman:Pfizer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Agios: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct the trial ; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; GSK: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Epizyme: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Ariad: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Boeringer Ingelheim: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Immune Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Astellas Pharma: Other; FujiFilm: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cyclacel: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celator: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Genetech: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work. Arellano:Cephalon: Research Funding. Mannis:Agios: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NKarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pollyea:Gilead: Consultancy; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Argenx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stein:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Uy:GlycoMimetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy. Watts:Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Fathi:Astellas: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Orsenix: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunogen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tallman:AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kapsalis:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hickman:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Attar:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stone:Merck: Consultancy; Cornerstone: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Ono: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee; Jazz: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Abstract: Background: Double-hit lymphomas (DHL) - diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) with concurrent rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6, and double-expressor lymphomas (DEL) - DLBCL with co-expression of MYC and BCL2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), are associated with poor outcomes after standard chemoimmunotherapy. We have previously demonstrated that patients with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) DHL and DEL have inferior outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) compared to patients with neither DEL nor DHL [Herrera et al, ASH 2015]. Although patients with DEL and DHL have inferior outcomes after chemotherapy-based treatment modalities, we hypothesized that allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) could potentially abrogate that negative prognostic impact. Data are extremely limited regarding the outcome of patients with DHL who undergo alloSCT, and no study has examined alloSCT outcomes in patients with DEL. We studied alloSCT outcomes in a multicenter cohort of rel/ref DLBCL patients and evaluated the prognostic impact of DEL and DHL status. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with rel/ref DLBCL, transformed indolent lymphoma (TIL), or high-grade B-cell lymphoma unclassified (BCLU) who had available tumor tissue and underwent alloSCT at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, or City of Hope between 1/2000 and 5/2014. IHC for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 were performed. DEL was defined as MYC expression in ≥ 40% tumor cells and BCL2 expression in ≥ 50% tumor cells. FISH for MYC was performed using dual-color break-apart probes. Cases with MYC-rearrangement had FISH performed for BCL2 and BCL6 using break-apart probes. Rearrangement was defined as ≥ 10% nuclei with break-apart signals. DHL was defined as concurrent rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6. Results: Tumor tissue was available in 103 patients, among whom we could obtain complete IHC and FISH data in 74. In these 74 patients, the median age was 54 years (range 24-69); 69% had DLBCL/BCLU whereas 31% had TIL; the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-9); 58% had prior autoSCT; 73% were in complete or partial remission (CR/PR) at alloSCT; 77% had reduced intensity conditioning (RIC); 78% had a matched related or unrelated donor. 4y progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the overall cohort were 34%, 40%, 44% and 22%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 46 months for survivors. 47% of patients had DEL and 14% had DHL. The proportion of patients with a history of primary refractory disease was higher among DHL (60%) and DEL (52%) patients compared to nonDHL/nonDEL patients (37%), although the difference was not significant (p=0.3). Overall, there were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between patients with DHL, DEL, and nonDHL/nonDEL. Neither DEL nor DHL were significantly associated with outcome (Figure). The 4y PFS in DEL v non-DEL patients was 29% v 39% (p=0.2), 4y OS 30% v 49% (p=0.11), 4y CIR 50% v 40% (p=0.3), and 4y NRM 21% v 22% (p=1.0). The 4y PFS in DHL v non-DHL patients was 40% v 33% (p=0.6), OS 50% v 37% (p=0.4), CIR 40% v 45% (p=0.9), and NRM 20% v 22% (p=0.8). In multivariable Cox models for PFS and OS, age ≥ 55 (PFS: HR 0.4, p=0.002; OS: HR 0.4, p=0.005), refractory disease (not CR/PR) at alloSCT (PFS: HR 2.4, p=0.009; OS HR 2.6, p=0.007), and TIL (PFS HR 0.4, p=0.018; OS HR 0.4, p=0.028) were associated with PFS and OS, but DEL (PFS HR 1.2, p=0.5; OS HR 1.6, p=0.12) and DHL (PFS HR 0.8, p=0.7; OS HR 0.8, p=0.7) were not. We also constructed multivariable competing risk regression models for CIR and NRM. Age, remission status, histology, and conditioning intensity were associated with relapse, while no factor was significantly associated with NRM. Neither DEL (CIR HR 1.2, p=0.7, NRM HR 0.8, p=0.7) nor DHL (CIR HR 1.1, p=0.9, NRM HR 0.8, p=0.8) were associated with either outcome in those models. Conclusions: AlloSCT produced durable remissions in heavily treated rel/ref DLBCL patients, regardless of DEL and DHL status. In our cohort, DEL and DHL status did not have a significant prognostic impact. Although patients with DEL or DHL have poorer outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy and autoSCT, our results suggest that alloSCT may overcome the chemoresistance of double-hit/double-expressor tumors. Figure Progression-Free Survival After AlloSCT in DEL, DHL, and nonDEL/nonDHL Patients Figure. Progression-Free Survival After AlloSCT in DEL, DHL, and nonDEL/nonDHL Patients Disclosures Herrera: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Song:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chen:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Koreth:LLS: Research Funding; amgen inc: Consultancy; takeda pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; kadmon corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; prometheus labs inc: Research Funding; millennium pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pillai:Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding. Siddiqi:Janssen Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Zain:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kwak:XEME BioPharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Antigenics: Equity Ownership; Celltrion: Consultancy; Sella Life Sciences: Consultancy. Nademanee:Celgene: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weinstock:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Soiffer:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rodig:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Perkin Elmer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Armand:Roche: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sequenta Inc: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract: Selective targeting of BCL-2 with the BH3-mimetic venetoclax has been a transformative treatment for patients with various leukemias. TP-53 controls apoptosis upstream of where BCL-2 and its prosurvival relatives, such as MCL-1, act. Therefore, targeting these prosurvival proteins could trigger apoptosis across diverse blood cancers, irrespective of TP53 mutation status. Indeed, targeting BCL-2 has produced clinically relevant responses in blood cancers with aberrant TP-53. However, in our study, TP53-mutated or -deficient myeloid and lymphoid leukemias outcompeted isogenic controls with intact TP-53, unless sufficient concentrations of BH3-mimetics targeting BCL-2 or MCL-1 were applied. Strikingly, tumor cells with TP-53 dysfunction escaped and thrived over time if inhibition of BCL-2 or MCL-1 was sublethal, in part because of an increased threshold for BAX/BAK activation in these cells. Our study revealed the key role of TP-53 in shaping long-term responses to BH3-mimetic drugs and reconciled the disparate pattern of initial clinical response to venetoclax, followed by subsequent treatment failure among patients with TP53-mutant chronic lymphocytic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia. In contrast to BH3-mimetics targeting just BCL-2 or MCL-1 at doses that are individually sublethal, a combined BH3-mimetic approach targeting both prosurvival proteins enhanced lethality and durably suppressed the leukemia burden, regardless of TP53 mutation status. Our findings highlight the importance of using sufficiently lethal treatment strategies to maximize outcomes of patients with TP53-mutant disease. In addition, our findings caution against use of sublethal BH3-mimetic drug regimens that may enhance the risk of disease progression driven by emergent TP53-mutant clones.

Abstract: Background: The benefit of allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) following myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in first complete remission (CR1) compared to chemotherapy has been demonstrated in a randomized trial for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Persistence of measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to alloBMT confers an increased risk of relapse. Blinatumomab eradicates persistent or recurrent MRD at levels ≥10 -3 in 78% of B ALL. However, post-hoc analyses of patients who have undergone alloBMT following blinatumomab for MRD demonstrate non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 36.5%. NRM following nonmyeloablative (NMAC) alloBMT with high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is just 11%. Given broadly similar outcomes between HLA-matched MAC alloBMT and HLA-haploidentical NMAC alloBMT following PTCy, we have shifted to using exclusively NMAC alloBMT with PTCy and sought to explore outcomes depending on receipt of pre-transplant blinatumomab. Methods: The bone marrow transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for adult patients with Ph-negative B-ALL who received NMAC alloBMT in CR1 using PTCy between January 2008 and July 2020. Characteristics of patients were summarized and compared using the student's T test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Estimators of OS and RFS were reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in time-to-event outcomes were estimated using Cox proportional hazards model for OS and RFS, and Fine and Gray's model for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)/NRM considering competing events. Results: Among the 50 identified patients undergoing 1 st transplant in CR1 with NMAC, all received conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by total body irradiation (TBI). In addition to PTCy, all patients received mycophenolate mofetil and either tacrolimus or sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis. Sixteen patients (32%) received blinatumomab in CR1 or achieved CR1 following blinatumomab and proceeded to transplant without intervening therapy, while 34 patients (68%) did not. At the time of treatment with blinatumomab; 3 patients had & gt;5% blasts after chemotherapy, 8 had persistent or recurrent MRD & gt;10 -4 after chemotherapy, and 5 had no evidence of MRD at a sensitivity of 10 -4. Among the 5 MRD- patients treated with blinatumomab; 1 had been refractory to their first course of chemotherapy (67% blasts), 3 had MRD & gt;10 -4 at the first MRD response assessment following chemotherapy, and 1 had CNS involvement at diagnosis. The demographics of these two groups are presented in Table 1 and separated by pre-transplant blinatumomab status. The groups were well balanced in terms of gender, age, WBC at diagnosis, CNS involvement at diagnosis, and donor type. Patients who received blinatumomab were more likely to have been refractory to their initial course of chemotherapy and were transplanted later after their initial diagnosis than those who did not. All patients who received blinatumomab were MRD-negative at a sensitivity of 10 -4 prior to their transplant, while 11.8% of patients who did not receive blinatumomab were MRD-positive. Relapse-free and overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and non-relapse mortality by receipt of blinatumomab prior to transplant are shown in Figure 1. Non-relapse mortality was not increased among patients who received pre-transplant blinatumomab (HR=1.06, p=0.94). The causes of non-relapse mortality included GVHD (1) and secondary malignancy (1) in patients who received blinatumomab; and infection (1), bleeding (1), secondary malignancy (1), and other (1) in patients who did not receive blinatumomab. Receipt of pre-transplant blinatumomab was associated with a decreased cumulative incidence of relapse (HR=0.15, p=0.07) and improved relapse-free survival (HR=0.32, p=0.07). Overall survival (HR=0.63, p=0.5) between the two groups was similar, likely reflecting the efficacy of salvage therapies such as CD19 CAR T cells; blinatumomab; and inotuzumab in the relapsed, post-transplant population. Conclusions: Treatment with blinatumomab prior to NMAC alloBMT with PTCy in CR1 for Ph-negative B ALL did not increase NRM and produced a 3-year RFS of 81%. The low CIR and NRM of NMAC alloBMT in an MRD-negative CR1 following blinatumomab suggest it could be a viable alternative to MAC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Webster: AmGen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. DeZern: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levis: Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas and FujiFilm: Research Funding; Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, FujiFilm, and Menarini: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghiaur: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Menarini Richerche: Research Funding. Hourigan: Sellas: Research Funding. Jain: Syneos Health: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; CareDx: Other: for advisory board participation; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: for advisory board participation; Targeted Healthcare Communications: Consultancy. Ali: Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Aduro: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Aduro: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: Reduced-intensity induction (RII) with imatinib yields comparable outcomes to HyperCVAD with imatinib with fewer induction deaths and an improved CR rate in Ph+ ALL (Chalandon. Blood. 2015). Dasatinib with steroids also produces excellent responses with little toxicity (Foa. Blood. 2011). Allogeneic bone marrow transplant (AlloBMT) remains the goal of therapy in Ph+ ALL based on contemporary trials with TKIs demonstrating improved survival in patients transplanted in CR1, and we have shown that transplant following induction with dasatinib yields better outcomes than with imatinib. Thus we implemented RII with dasatinib for the treatment of Ph+ ALL and compared to patients who received HyperCVAD with a 2nd generation TKI. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL admitted to Johns Hopkins Hospital from September 2017-June 2020 underwent a 4-week RII with: vincristine 2 mg/d weekly, dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly on days 1 and 2, and dasatinib 100 mg PO daily. CNS prophylaxis with IT MTX was given on day 8. Dexamethasone and vincristine were reduced by 50% for patients over age 70. Filgrastim was started on day 15 for patients without ANC recovery. Patients who received HyperCVAD with dose adjustments for age (Rausch et al. Cancer. 2020) from July 2011-June 2020 were included for comparison. Dasatinib 100 mg PO daily or nilotinib 400 mg PO BID were given with HyperCVAD at the discretion of the treating physician. Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on days 1 and 8 was given based on CD20 status. Subsequent therapy after induction was not specifically mandated. Results: 21 patients received RII and 24 received HyperCVAD. The cohorts were comparable in terms of gender (38.1% female vs. 50%, p=0.55), age (median 49.8 vs. 50.3, p=0.33), age & gt;60 (33.3% vs. 29.2%, p & gt;0.99), median WBC at diagnosis (19 vs. 23.5, p=0.56), and the presence of decompensated DIC (fibrinogen & lt;150) prior to treatment initiation (4.8% vs. 8.3%, p & gt;0.99). Among the patients treated with HyperCVAD, 15 received dasatinib (62.5%) and 9 received nilotinib (37.5%). Rituximab use was balanced between the cohorts (61.9% vs. 58.3%, p & gt;0.99). Table 1 compares the time to ANC recovery & gt;500, transfusion requirements within 30 days of chemotherapy initiation, rates of decompensated DIC following treatment initiation, and the duration of inpatient hospitalization for induction. While the rates of decompensated DIC were similar in each cohort, patients treated with RII required fewer platelet and pRBC transfusions. ANC recovery was faster following RII, and only 5 patients (23.8%) received growth factor support. All patients achieved a hematologic response. There was one induction death with HyperCVAD (4.2%). Most patients received a subsequent cycle of high-dose (HD) MTX and Ara-C with TKI (76.2% following RII and 91.7% following HyperCVAD). The remaining patients treated with RII subsequently received HD MTX (14.2%) or blinatumomab (9.5%) with TKI due to co-morbidities. Among those patients treated with HD MTX and Ara-C, blinatumomab was given with TKI to 6 patients (37.5%) who initially received RII and 1 patient (4.5%) after HyperCVAD (p=0.03) due to persistent MRD. As shown in Figure 1, the incidence of MRD-negativity by multi-color flow cytometry (MFC) with a sensitivity of 10-4 at day 120 after treatment initiation was similar for RII (85.4%, 95% CI 64.8-97.1) versus HyperCVAD (86.7%, 95% CI 69.8-96.6). Among patients subsequently treated with HD MTX and Ara-C, 62.5% proceeded to alloBMT after RII with an additional 12.5% currently undergoing transplant evaluation, while 86.4% proceeded to alloBMT after HyperCVAD. The 1-year RFS and OS following RII were 87.9% (95% CI 59.6-96.8) and 100% compared to 87.5% (95% CI 66.1-95.8) and 95.8% (95% CI 73.9-99.4) following HyperCVAD. Conclusion: RII with dasatinib results in fewer transfusions and less myelosuppression compared to HyperCVAD with a 2nd generation TKI. More patients treated with RII received blinatumomab following high-dose MTX and Ara-C, but the rates of MRD-negativity were comparable between the two regimens. Thus RII with dasatinib followed by MRD-guided follow-up therapy facilitates MRD negative remissions with less toxicity than HyperCVAD. The vast majority of fit patients were able to proceed to alloBMT following either regimen. Transplant outcomes following dasatinib with induction are presented in our concurrent abstract demonstrating a 5-year RFS of 83% (95% CI 59.8-93.5). Disclosures Webster: Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Jain:Bristol Myer Squibb: Other: for advisory board participation; CareDx: Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dalton:AbbVie: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding. DeZern:Abbvie: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; MEI: Consultancy. Gojo:Genentech: Research Funding; Amphivena: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. Bolanos-Meade:Incyte: Other: DSMB Fees. Luznik:WindMil Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder; AbbVie: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding. Ali:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borrello:Celgene: Research Funding; Aduro: Patents & Royalties; WindMIL Therapeutics: Other: Founder , Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:ADC Therapeutics, Regeneron, CALIB-R, Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levis:Menarini: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding.