GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, ( 2020-01-31)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 3474-3474
    Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Matching all alleles of the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 loci (8/8 match) is associated with the highest overall survival (OS) rates after unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In Europe, patients (pts) are also matched at the HLA-DQB1 loci (10/10 match), although there is no evidence of better OS. Data on Caucasian pts receiving a single HLA mismatch URD HSCT are still controversial. We therefore conducted a multicenter retrospective study to assess the impact of a single HLA mismatch (9/10 match) on outcomes after URD HSCT in a large cohort of French pts. METHODS: We collected data from 1092 pts who underwent HSCT between January 2000 and December 2012 at 32 French transplantation centers. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. High-resolution typing was performed for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1 loci for all donor/recipient pairs. Clinical data were obtained through ProMISe (Project Manager Internet Server), an internet-based system shared by all French transplantation centers. Endpoints of interest were classical HSCT outcomes: engraftment, Graft versus host disease (GvHD), treatment related mortality (TRM) and relapse. GvHD free relapse free survival was also studied (defined as alive with no previous grade III-IV aGvHD, no moderate or severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) and no relapse). Myeloablative conditioning was defined as a combination of agents expected to produce profound pancytopenia and myeloablation within 1-3 weeks after administration; pancytopenia is long lasting, usually irreversible and in most instances fatal, unless hematopoiesis is restored by hematopoietic stem cell infusion (Bacigalupo, et al.. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2009). Models were adjusted for disease risk, recipient age, CMV and sex matching, stem cell source, GVHD prophylaxis and conditioning regimen. For adjusted analysis DQB1 was used as the reference category. Disease risk was classified as standard or high risk using the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Request for Information 2006 risk scoring schema. RESULTS: Population characteristics are shown in Table 1. Gender balance was the only difference between groups (p 〈 0.013). Median follow-up was 84 months. Engraftment rates were not different between groups (overall, 91.8% (95% Confidence interval (CI) (90.1 to 93.4)). Overall Cumulative Incidence of aGVHD grade II-IV and grade III-IV were 39.9% (95% CI, (38.0 to 41.8)) and 22.2% (95% CI, (20.2 to 24.2)), respectively. Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC) using Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 〉 4Gy [Hazard Ratio (HR) HR:1.95 (95% CI, 1.45 to 2.63)] and high disease risk [HR :1.34 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.66)] were significantly associated with an increased cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD, whereas only MAC with TBI 〉 4Gy was a risk factor for grade III-IV aGVHD [HR:1.91 (95% CI, 1.28 to 2.87)].Overall Cumulative Incidence of cGVHD was 38.1% (95% CI, 35.9 to 40.1) at 84 months. Overall relapse rate was 33.8% (95% CI, 30.5 to 37.1) with no differences according to HLA mismatch subtype. CI of TRM was 36.0% (95% IC, 32.9 to 39.1). Single HLA-A mismatch [HR:1.55 (95% CI , 1.11 to 2.17)] , high disease risk [HR:1.40 (1.12 to 1.74)], a female donor for a male recipient [HR:1.41 (1.10 to 1.79)] , and the use of a MAC regimen [HR:1.50 (1.08 to 2.08)] were significantly associated with a higher TRM after adjusted analysis. Overall GRFS was 14.5% (12.1 to 17.3). Single HLA-A mismatch [HR:1.25 (95% IC, 1.01 to 1.54)] and high disease risk [HR:1.45 (95% IC, 1.26 to 1.67)] were significantly associated with a lower GRFS (Figure1). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of Caucasian pts who received a single HLA mismatch URD HSCT, high disease risk was the major prognostic factor related to higher rates of both acute GvHD and treatment related mortality, and eventually a lower GRFS. HSCT outcomes were similar according to HLA single mismatches except for HLA-A mismatch, which was associated with a significant increase in TRM, and a worse GFRS. This study also highlights the high rates of both TRM and relapse after single mismatch URD HSCT (9/10) which justifies the use of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens, as well as the addition of targeted therapies pre- and post- HSCT in this setting. Disclosures Michallet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Peffault De Latour:Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2371-2371
    Abstract: Abstract 2371 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) appears to offer a potential advantage in terms of event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with acute leukemia (AL) with bad prognostic factors. The main issue is to find a donor; usually, a patient has 30% chance to find an HLA identical sibling donor (SD) and approximately 40% chance to find a suitable unrelated donor (UD) from international registries. Unfortunately, 40% of registered patients relapse or die before finding a donor. Aim: Our objective was to evaluate the outcome (OS & EFS) in AL patients, whether they had an HLA identical SD, an UD or no donor (ND) after registration on France Greffe de Moelle (FGM) registry, either transplanted later or not. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of interval between, diagnosis and allo-HSCT, donor finding and allo-HSCT, interval registration-allo-HSCT, on OS and EFS. Methods: We have analyzed 251 AL patients diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2008, for whom a search for a donor was initiated for a required allo-HSCT. There were 117 (47%) males and 134 females with a median age at diagnosis of 40 years [16-66], 177 (71%) were AML (prognosis according to cytogenetics & molecular markers: 59 were good, 97 poor and 21 not done) 75 were ALL (prognosis according to cytogenetics & molecular markers: 33 were good, 16 poor and 26 not done). Seventy six (30%) patients had an available SD and received allo-HSCT within a median time of 3.5 months (0.5 – 43) (59 AML & 17 ALL), and 38 (15%) with SD but were not transplanted due to early relapse and/or death. For patients with no available SD, a registration on FGM registry was done. One hundred thirty seven patients were registered after a median interval of 2.3 months (0.4-135) from diagnosis, 33 (13%) patients (24 AML & 9 ALL) did not find any donor, have not been transplanted and they received the standard of care. One hundred and four (41%) patients (62 AML & 42ALL) found an UD or cord blood cell (CBC) unit after a median registration time of 1.6 months (0.3 – 26): 86 with UD of which only 60 have been transplanted within a median time of 2.3 months (0.4 – 14), 18 with CBU of which only 17 were transplanted. Among transplanted patients, 113 (74%) were in complete response (CR) at transplantation, and 40 were in less than CR. Fifty (33%) received peripheral blood (PBSC) (23 UD & 27 SD), 86 (57%) received bone marrow (BM) (37 UD & 49 SD) and 17 (10%) CBC units. For conditioning, 56 (37%) were reduced intensity (29 SD & 27 UD) and 96 standard (47SD & 50 UD). For HLA, there were 45 HLA 10/10, (27BM & 18 PBSC), 14 HLA 9/10 (9BM 5PBSC) 1 HLA 8/10 (BM) and for CBC 14 HLA 4/6 and 3 HLA 5/6. Results: After a median follow-up of 25 months (0.2- 234), the median OS was 78 months (51 – 133) for transplanted patients with SD (3years OS: 68%), it was 33 months (27 – 47) for transplanted patients with UD (3years OS: 44%), 21 months (15 – 37) for not transplanted patients with available SD or UD (3years OS: 34%) and finally it was 31 months (23-221) for patients with ND (3years OS: 45%). The median EFS for the same groups was 38 months (23 – 133), 24 months (17 – 36), 15 months (11-24) and 23 months (14 – 48) respectively. The only factors negatively affecting OS in multivariate analysis (studying age, sex, AL type, cytogenetics, donor or no donor, transplanted or not, UD or SD) were age and allo-transplanted from UD. When adjusting only on transplanted patients, taking into account in addition to previous factors, the time between diagnosis-registration, time between registration-allo-HSCT, disease status at allo-HSCT, stem cell source, conditioning; three significant factors affected OS: disease status ( 〈 CR) HR= 2.8 [1.5-5.3] p 〈 0.001; long interval between diagnosis-registration HR= 2 [1.2-3.6] p=0.001 and conditioning (standard) HR=0.27 [0.1-0.8] p=0.02. (3years OS for SD allo-HSCT, UD allo-HSCT late and early registration: 59%, 29% and 47% respectively). Conclusion: The results of our first analysis seemed surprising regarding our knowledge of outcome in allo-HSCT from SD and UD, which led us to investigate on unusual interfering factors. We have explored the relation between the interval diagnosis-registration for a donor search and the interval registration-allo-HSCT that appeared as major factors affecting survival in UD allo-HSCT settings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 3111-3111
    Abstract: Abstract 3111 Cord blood transplantation (CB-T) is increasingly used as a treatment alternative for hematological malignancies. The use of double CB-T has leaded to interesting results in adult patients. We retrospectively evaluated 31 patients, 19 males and 12 females with a median age of 36 years (range: 20–63) who received double CB-T for hematological malignancies at our institution between 2005 and 2011. There were 15 AML, 9 ALL, 2 CML, 1 Hodgkin disease, 1 NHL, 1 MM and 1 MDS; at transplantation, 18 (58%) were in CR, 5 (16%) in PR and 8 (26%) in relapse, 16 patients received a myeloablative conditioning and 15 a reduced intensity one. Different characteristics of both CB units (CBU) are described in Table 1. When considering matching variables between the 2 CBUs and the recipient, for sex matching: in 10 cases, CBUs were both matched with the recipient, in 1 case both mismatched and in 20 cases, only 1 CBU was mismatched with recipient. For ABO compatibility, in 7 cases, CBUs were both compatible with the recipient, in 13 cases both were incompatible and in 1 case, only one was incompatible. For HLA matching, in 18 cases, both CBUs were 4/6 with the recipient and in 13 cases, only one CBU was 5/6. When considering HLA matching between the 2 CBUs, there were 7 with 3/6 HLA matching, 17 with 4/6, 6 with 5/6 and 1 with 6/6. After transplantation, 25 (81%) patients engrafted among them, 6 had mixed chimerism (presence of the 2 CBUs) and 19 had one dominant CBU. Non-engrafted patients were in relapse or progressive disease and received RIC before allo-HSCT. There were 13 patients who developed acute GVHD ≥2 (8 grade III-IV) and 6 chronic GVHD (3 limited and 3 extensive). After a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range: 1–54), the median OS was not reached with a 1 year probability of 58% (95%CI: 42–80), only 3 patients relapsed. The cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) was 37% (95%CI: 28–46). A multivariate model that studied the different matching possibilities (sex, ABO and HLA) between the 2 CBUs together and then between the 2 CBUs with the recipient combined to CNT and CD34 cells number, showed that only the sex matching between the 3 partners can determine the dominant CBU later (p=0.04). In multivariate analysis taking into account pre-transplant and the matching variables, no factor impacted the engraftment while factors that impacted on OS were age [HR=1.1 (1.03–1.25), p=0.01], disease status at HSCT [relapse, HR=8.7 (1.4–52), p=0.01] and TNC number [ HR=0.99 (0.98–1), p=0.02]. Age and TNC number also had a significant impact on TRM [HR=1.12 (1.02–1.23), p=0.01 and HR=0.99 (0.98–1), p=0.003] . In conclusion, we did not find any impact of the different matching variables between the 2 CBUs either together or with the recipient on different transplantation outcomes. Nevertheless, sex matching between the 3 partners seems to play a role in the determination of the dominant CBU later and its installation in the recipient. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 4363-4363
    Abstract: Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) function is critical in maintaining hematopoiesis continuously throughout the lifespan of an organism and any change in their ability to self-renew and/or to differentiate into blood cell lineages induces severe diseases. Postnatally, HSC are mainly located in bone marrow where their stem cell fate is regulated through a complex network of local influences, thought to be concentrated in the bone marrow (BM) niche. Despite more than 30 years of research, the precise location of the HSC niche in human BM remains unclear because most observations were obtained from mice models. BM harvesting collects macroscopic coherent tissue aggregates in a cell suspension variably diluted with blood. The qualitative interest of these tissue aggregates, termed hematons, was already reported (first by I. Blaszek's group (Blaszek et al., 1988, 1990) and by our group (Boiret et al., 2003)) yet they remain largely unknown. Should hematons really be seen as elementary BM units, they must accommodate hematopoietic niches and must be a complete ex vivo surrogate of BM tissue. In this study, we analyzed hematons as single tissue structures. Biological samples were collected from i) healthy donor bone marrow (n= 8); ii) either biological samples collected for routine analysis by selecting bone marrow with normal analysis results (n=5); or iii) from spongy bone collected from the femoral head during hip arthroplasty (n=4). After isolation of hematons, we worked at single level, we used immunohistochemistry techniques, scanning electronic microscopy, confocal microscopy, flow cytometry and cell culture. Each hematon constitutes a miniature BM structure organized in lobular form around the vascular tree. Hematons are organized structures, supported by a network of cells with numerous cytoplasmic expansions associated with an amorphous structure corresponding to the extracellular matrix. Most of the adipocytes are located on the periphery, and hematopoietic cells can be observed as retained within the mesenchymal network. Although there is a degree of inter-donor variability in the cellular contents of hematons (on average 73 +/- 10 x103 cells per hematon), we observed precursors of all cell lines in each structure. We detected a higher frequency of CD34+ cells than in filtered bone marrow, representing on average 3% and 1% respectively (p 〈 0.01). Also, each hematon contains CFU-GM, BFU-E, CFU-Mk and CFU-F cells. Mesenchymal cells are located mainly on the periphery and seem to participate in supporting the structure. The majority of mesenchymal cells isolated from hematons (21/24) sustain in vitro hematopoiesis. Interestingly, more than 90% of the hematons studied contained LTC-ICs. Furthermore, when studied using confocal microscopy, a co-localization of CD34+ cells with STRO1+ mesenchymal cells was frequently observed (75% under 10 µm of the nearest STRO-1+ cell, association statistically highly significant; p 〈 1.10-16). These results indicate the presence of one or several stem cell niches housing highly primitive progenitor cells. We are confirming these in vitro data with an in vivo xenotransplantation model. These structures represent the elementary functional units of adult hematopoietic tissue and are a particularly attractive model for studying homeostasis of the BM niche and the pathological changes occurring during disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 19 ( 2011-11-10), p. 5130-5140
    Abstract: Absent in peripheral tissues during homeostasis, human plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are described in inflamed skin or mucosa. Here, we report that, unlike blood pDCs, a subset of tonsil pDCs express functional CCR6 and CCR10, and their respective ligands CCL20 and CCL27are detected in inflamed epithelia contacting blood dendritic cell antigen 2+ pDCs. Moreover, pDCs are recruited to imiquimod-treated skin tumors in WT but not CCR6-deficient mice, and competitive adoptive transfers reveal that CCR6-deficient pDCs are impaired in homing to inflamed skin tumors after intravenous transfer. On IL-3 culture, CCR6 and CCR10 expression is induced on human blood pDCs that become responsive to CCL20 and CCL27/CCL28, respectively. Interestingly, unlike myeloid DC, blood pDCs initially up-regulate CCR7 expression and CCL19 responsiveness on IL-3 ± CpG-B and then acquire functional CCR6 and CCR10. Finally, IL-3–differentiated CCR6+ CCR10+ pDCs secrete high levels of IFN-α in response to virus. Overall, we propose an unexpected pDCs migratory model that may best apply for mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues. After CCR7-mediated extravasation into lymphoid tissues draining inflamed epithelia, blood pDCs may be instructed to up-regulate CCR6 and/or CCR10 allowing their homing into inflamed epithelia (in mucosae or skin). At this site, pDCs can then produce IFN-α contributing to pathogen clearance and/or local inflammation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 200-200
    Abstract: Hemophilia is an attractive target for gene therapy, since activity levels as low as 1% to 2% of normal are beneficial and levels of ~5% prevent spontaneous bleeding. Our goal was to provide a single treatment that permanently enables hepatic production of therapeutic levels of hFIX activity to decrease or potentially eliminate the need for prophylactic treatment in hemophilia B patients. We performed targeted in vivo genome editing using 1) two zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) targeting intron 1 of the albumin locus, and 2) a human F9 donor template construct. The ZFNs and donor template are encoded on separate hepatotropic adeno-associated virus serotype 2/6 (AAV2/6) vectors injected intravenously, resulting in targeted insertion of a corrected copy of the hF9 gene into the albumin locus in a proportion of liver hepatocytes. The albumin locus was selected as a "safe harbor" as production of this most abundant plasma protein exceeds 10 g/day, and moderate reductions in those levels are well-tolerated. These genome edited hepatocytes produce normal hFIX in therapeutic quantities, rather than albumin, driven by the highly active albumin enhancer/promoter, to treat hemophilia B; the genetic modification is expected to be sustained even in the face of hepatocyte turnover, making this approach attractive for treating young children with hemophilia before the appearance of significant organ damage. Transformed and primary human hepatocytes transduced in vitro with AAV2/6 encoding human albumin ZFNs and a promoterless hF9 transgene were shown to secrete hFIX. Extensive molecular analyses demonstrated that this was due to targeted integration of the hF9 transgene at the albumin locus and splicing of this gene into the albumin transcript. By employing AAV2/6 delivery of murine-specific ZFNs in vivo, stable levels of hFIX were observed in blood of mice injected with the albumin ZFNs and hF9 transgene donor. C57BL/6 mice were administered vehicle (n=20) or AAV2/6 vectors (n=25) encoding mouse surrogate reagents at 1.0 x1013 vector genome (vg)/kg via tail vein injection. ELISA analysis of plasma hFIX in the treated mice showed peak levels of 50-1053 ng/mL that were sustained for the duration of the 6-month study. Analysis of FIX activity from mouse plasma confirmed bioactivity commensurate with expression levels. Next, we report the feasibility of this approach in non-human primates (NHPs), showing that a single intravenous co-infusion of AAV2/6 vectors encoding the NHP targeted albumin-specific ZFNs and a human F9 donor at 1.2x1013 vg/kg (n=5/group) resulted in 〉 50 ng/mL ( 〉 1% of normal) in this large animal model. The use of higher AAV2/6 doses (up to 1.5x1014 vg/kg) yielded plasma hFIX levels up to 1000 ng/ml (or 20% of normal) in several animals and up to 2000 ng/ml (or 50% of normal) in a single animal, for the duration of the study (3 months). The treatment was well tolerated in mice and NHPs, with no significant toxicological findings related to AAV2/6 ZFN + donor treatment in either species at therapeutic doses. Together, these data support a clinical trial to determine if a single co-administration of ZFN and donor AAV vectors is sufficient to enable therapeutic and potentially lifelong production of the clotting factor for the treatment of Hemophilia B. Disclosures Wechsler: Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. Meyer:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Spratt:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Greengard:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Santiago:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Sproul:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Surosky:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Paschon:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Dubois-Stringfellow:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Ando:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Nichol:Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Employment. Rebar:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. Holmes:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 4481-4481
    Abstract: Abstract 4481 Introduction: HLA matching has been demonstrated to play a major role in the different outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with hematological malignancies. When searching for an unrelated donor the commonly evaluated HLA loci are -A, -B, ± -C, -DRB1 and DQB1. The 2 loci DRB3 and DRB4 have never been taken into account and never been evaluated. Aims: To evaluate the impact of HLA-DRB3 and -DRB4 on the different unrelated allo-HSCT outcomes especially in case of mismatch presence on these loci. Material and methods: We have of 30 patients (study group) who received unrelated allo-HSCT with a HLA-DRB3 or HLA-DRB4 mismatched donor and we compared their outcomes to outcomes of a matched control group of 30 patients with the same characteristics except for the DRB3 or DRB4 donor mismatching. In the study group, there were 16 males and 14 females with a median age of 45 years (25–62), 18 patients had AML, 6 ALL, 2 MDS, 2 multiple myeloma (MM), 1 CML and 1 NHL. Fifteen patients received a myeloablative conditioning and 15 received a reduced intensity one (RIC). At transplantation, 16 patients were in CR, 4 in PR and 10 in relapse; 15 patients received PBSC and 15 BM. There were 16 patients with 10/10 HLA identical donor among them 11 had a DRB3 mismatch and 5 had a DRB4 mismatch. There were 14 patients with 9/10 HLA identical donor among them 9 had a DRB3 mismatch (mismatched: 3 on HLA-A, 1HLA-B, 4 HLA-C and 1 on HLA-DQB1) and 5 had a DRB4 mismatch (mismatched: 1 on HLA-A, 1HLA-B, 1 HLA-C and 2 on HLA-DQB1). In the control group, there were 16 males and 14 females with a median age of 46 years (25–64), 18 patients had AML, 6 ALL, 3 MM, 1 CML and 2 NHL. Fifteen patients received a myeloablative conditioning and 15 received a RIC. At transplantation, 22 patients were in CR, 1 in PR and 7 in relapse; 15 patients received PBSC and 15 received BM. There were 16 patients with 10/10 HLA identical donor and 14 patients with 9/10 HLA identical donor (mismatched: 6 on HLA-A, 3 HLA-B, 4 HLA-C and 1 on HLA-DQB1) all patients in the control group were matched for HLA-DRB3 and –DRB4. Results: After HSCT, 27 (90%) patients in the study group engrafted while 29 (96%) engrafted in the control group. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD≥2 at 3 months was 37% (28–46) and 30% (22–39) for the study and control groups respectively, with a same cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at one year of 20% (12–28). At day 90 post HSCT, 17 (63%) patients in the study group were in CR and 25 (86%) in CR in the control group. After a median follow-up of 5 months (0.2–46) and 13 months (0.5–60) for study and control groups respectively, the median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (3–32) and 21 months (11-NR) with a 2-years probability of 25% (12–51) and 41% (25–69) respectively; the median time of progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (0.2–46) and 10 months (1–60) with a 2-years probability of 16% (6–42) and 37% (21–63) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year was the same for the two groups with 30% (22–39); the cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) at 3 months and 1 year were 17% (10–24) vs. 3% (0–7) and 37% (28–46) vs. 10% (5–16) for study and control groups respectively. The multivariate analysis that studied age, type of disease, matched or mismatched HLA, with or without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch, disease status at transplantation and type of conditioning showed a significant worse OS in 9/10 mismatched patients with or without a DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch (HR=5.3; [1.6–18] p=0.006); 10/10 matched patients with a DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch (HR=3.9; [1.2–12] p=0.02) and patients not in CR at transplantation (HR= 4.4; [1.6–12] p=0.004); similarly, the same groups had a worse PFS while patients not in CR or with a DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch showed a worse TRM in multivariate analysis, (HR=6; [1.5–24] p= 0.02) and (HR=3.5; [1.02–12] p=0.04) respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrated that the HLA-DRB3 or DRB4 matching donor is relevant for OS and TRM of patients who undergo allo-HSCT from unrelated donor either in the 10/10 or 9/10 HLA matching settings. Moreover, in view of the important impact of these loci mismatches, we recommend its consideration in the unrelated donor selection setting particularly in the 10/10 HLA unrelated donors. Since the evaluation of these loci is not widely done within HLA laboratories, we suggest conducting a large prospective study in order to validate its impact on unrelated allo-HSCT outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. 21 ( 2020-11-19), p. 2473-2477
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4540-4540
    Abstract: Abstract 4540 Introduction The impact of HLA DRB3 and DRB4 allele mismatch after allogeneic HSCT using unrelated donors is unclear. We therefore examined retrospectively the outcome of 35 patients who received HLA-10/10 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch between 2005 and 2011. This cohort of 35 patients was a part of a cohort of 132 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 2005–2011 with a 10/10-HLA matched donor. There were 18 males (51.4%) and 17 females (48.6%) with a median age of 48 years (range, 6–64), there were 13 (37%) AML, 9 (26%) ALL, 4 (11.5%) MDS, 3 (8.5%) multiple myeloma and 6 (5.7%) other (CML, CLL, NHL). Twenty patients (57%) received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 15 (43%) received a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). At transplantation, 21 patients (60%) were in complete remission (CR), 4 patients (11.5%) in partial remission (PR) and 10 (28.5%) in relapse; 13 (37%) patients received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and 22 (63%) received bone marrow (BM). Twelve (34%) patients had a mismatched DRB4 donor and 23 (66%) patients had a mismatched DRB3 donor. In the remains of 97 patients, there were 55 male (57%) and 42 female (43%), 28 (29%) patients received a MAC and 69 (71%) a RIC as regimen before allogeneic HSCT. The stem cell source was BM for 32 (34%) patients and PBSC for 65 (66%). At transplantation, 34 (35%) patients are in CR and 63 (65%) were in PR. The distribution of diagnosis was acute leukaemia and MDS for 44 (45%), CLL for 2 (2.5%) and other diagnosis (aplastic anemia, NHL, CML, MPS) for 51 patients (52.5%). Results After HSCT, 124 (94%) patients engrafted. After a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 0–76), the cumulative incidence of acute GvHD≥2 at 3 months was 20% (95%CI,16.5–24) and the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at one year was 19 % (95%CI, 15–22). In univariate analysis, the mismatch DRB3 or DRB4 had no effect on engraftment and no effect on acute GvHD (p=0.08) or chronic GvHD (p=0.63). There was no impact of DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch on relapse (p=0.33 and p=0.53, respectively) and on PFS (p=0.63 and p=0.07, respectively). We found an impact of the DRB4 mismatching (p=0.016) on overall survival. The median survival for patient without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch was 23 months (14-NR), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 32 months (12-NR), and for DRB4 mismatched patients 5 months (3-NR). The probability of survival at 24 months, for patients without mismatch DRB3 or DRB4 is 47% (36–61), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 51% (32–82) and for DRB4 mismatched patients 19% (6–66%). (figure1). The multivariate analysis that studied age, type of disease, DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch, sexmatching, TBI, ATG, disease status at transplantation and type of conditioning and stem cell source showed a significant impact of mismatch DRB4 on survival (HR= 2.5 [95%CI, 1.2–5.5] p=0.019); there was no impact for DRB3 mismatch (HR= 1.3 (95%CI,0.5–3.9 p=0.58). We found also an impact of the DRB4 mismatch on TRM (HR= 3.5; [95%CI, 1.6 –8] p= 0.026). The incidence of TRM at 24 months for patients without DRB3 or DRB4 mismatch is 29% (24–34), for patients with DRB3 mismatch 17% (9–26%) and for DRB4 mismatched patients 50% (34–66%). (figure 2). Conclusion The HLA DRB4 matching donor is relevant for survival of patients who undergo allo-HSCT from unrelated donor in the HLA-10/10 matching settings. In view of the important impact of these loci mismatches on clinical outcome, it seems to be important to consider this matching loci in the unrelated donor selection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...