GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (72)
  • 1
    In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 3, No. 23 ( 2019-12-10), p. 3982-4001
    Abstract: To address the global burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) and the need for novel therapies, the American Society of Hematology partnered with the US Food and Drug Administration to engage the work of 7 panels of clinicians, investigators, and patients to develop consensus recommendations for clinical trial end points. The panels conducted their work through literature reviews, assessment of available evidence, and expert judgment focusing on end points related to: patient-reported outcomes (PROs), pain (non-PROs), the brain, end-organ considerations, biomarkers, measurement of cure, and low-resource settings. This article presents the findings and recommendations of the PROs, pain, and brain panels, as well as relevant findings and recommendations from the biomarkers panel. The panels identify end points, where there were supporting data, to use in clinical trials of SCD. In addition, the panels discuss where further research is needed to support the development and validation of additional clinical trial end points.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 649-649
    Abstract: Introduction: Although recent studies have refined the classification of B-progenitor and T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia into gene-expression based subgroups, a comprehensive integration of significantly mutated genes and pathways for each subgroup is needed to understand disease etiology. Methods: We studied 2789 children, adolescents and young adults (AYA) with newly diagnosed B-ALL (n=2,322 cases) or T-ALL (n=467) treated on Children's Oncology Group (n=1,872) and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital trials (n=917). The cohort comprised childhood NCI standard-risk (41.8%; age range 1-9.99 yrs, WBC ≤ 50,000/ml), childhood NCI high-risk (44.5%; age range ≥10 to 15.99 yrs) and AYA (9.9%; age range 16-30.7 yrs). Genomic analysis was performed on tumor and matched-remission samples using whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq; tumor only; n=1,922), whole exome sequencing (n=1,659), whole genome sequencing (n=757), and single nucleotide polymorphism array (n=1,909). Results: For B-ALL, 2104 cases (90.6%) were classified into 26 subgroups based on RNA-seq gene expression data and aneuploidy or other gross chromosomal abnormalities (iAMP21, Down syndrome, dicentric), deregulation of known transcription factors by rearrangement or mutation (PAX5 P80R, IKZF1 N159Y), or activation of kinase alterations (Ph+, Ph-like). For T-ALL, cases were classified into 9 previously described subtypes based on dysregulation of transcription factor genes and gene expression. In 1,659 cases subject to exome sequencing (1259 B-ALL, 405 T-ALL) we identified 18,954 nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (SNV) and 2,329 insertion-deletion mutations (indels) in 8,985 genes. Overall, 161 potential driver genes were identified by the mutation-significance detection tool MutSigCV or by presence of pathogenic variants in known cancer genes. Integration of sequence mutations and DNA copy number alteration data in B-ALL identified 7 recurrently mutated pathways: transcriptional regulation (40.6%), cell cycle and tumor suppression (38.0%), B-cell development (34.5%), epigenetic regulation (24.7%), Ras signaling (33.0%), JAK-STAT signaling (12.0%) and protein modification (ubiquitination or SUMOylation, 5.0%). The top 10 genes altered by deletion or mutation in B-ALL were CDKN2A/B (30.1%), ETV6 (27.0%), PAX5 (24.6%), CDKN1B (20.3%), IKZF1 (17.6%), KRAS (16.5%), NRAS (14.6%), BTG1 (7.5%) histone genes on chromosome 6 (6.9%) and FLT3 (6.1%), and for T-ALL, CDKN2A/B (74.7%), NOTCH1 (68.2%), FBXW7 (21.3%), PTEN (20.5%) and PHF6 (18.2%) (Figure 1A). We identified 17 putative novel driver genes involved in ubiquitination (UBE2D3, UBE2A, UHRF1, and USP1), SUMOylation (SAE1, UBE2I), transcriptional regulation (ZMYM2, HMGB1), immune function (B2M), migration (CXCR4), epigenetic regulation (DOT1L) and mitochondrial function (LETM1). We also observed variation in the frequency of genes and pathways altered across B-ALL subtypes (Figure 1B). Interestingly, alteration of SAE1 and UBA2, novel genes that form a heterodimeric complex important for SUMOylation, and UHRF1 were enriched in ETV6-RUNX1 cases. Deletions of LETM1, ZMYM2 and CHD4 were associated with near haploid and low hypodiploid cases. Deletion of histone genes on chromosome 6 and alterations of HDAC7 were enriched in Ph+ and Ph-like ALL. Mutations in the RNA-binding protein ZFP36L2 were observed in PAX5alt, DUX4 and MEF2D subgroups. Genomic subtypes were prognostic. ETV6-RUNX1, hyperdiploid, DUX4 and ZNF384 ALL were associated with good outcome (5-yr EFS 91.1%, 87.2%, 91.9% and 85.7%, respectively), ETV6-RUNX1-like, iAMP21, low hyperdiploid, PAX5 P80R and PAX5alt were associated with intermediate outcome (5-yr EFS 68.6%, 72.2%, 70.8%, 77.0% and 70.9%, respectively), whilst KMT2A, MEF2D, Ph-like CRLF2 and Ph-like other conferred a poor prognosis (55.5%, 67.1%, 51.5% and 62.1%, respectively). TCF3-HLF and near haploid had the worst outcome with 5-yr EFS rates of 27.3% and 47.2%, respectively. Conclusions: These findings provide a comprehensive landscape of genomic alterations in childhood ALL. The associations of mutations with ALL subtypes highlights the need for specific patterns of cooperating mutations in the development of leukemia, which may help identify vulnerabilities for therapy intervention. Disclosures Gastier-Foster: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS): Other: Commercial Research; Incyte Corporation: Other: Commercial Research. Willman:to come: Patents & Royalties; to come: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; to come: Research Funding. Raetz:Pfizer: Research Funding. Borowitz:Beckman Coulter: Honoraria. Zweidler-McKay:ImmunoGen: Employment. Angiolillo:Servier Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Relling:Servier Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Hunger:Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mullighan:Amgen: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel, Research Funding; Illumina: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored travel.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. 15 ( 2019-10-10), p. 1227-1237
    Abstract: The authors report the interaction between Down syndrome, a major genetic leukemia predisposition condition, and inherited genetic alleles associated with increased susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 2382-2382
    Abstract: Contemporary risk stratification algorithms commonly use threshold-defined categories of clinically relevant risk factors. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) uses National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk group (RG), cytogenetics, and early response to therapy measured by minimal residual disease (MRD) using flow cytometry on day 8 peripheral blood (D8 PB) and day 29 bone marrow (D29 BM). However, it is unclear whether assigning different weights to individual risk factors, as well as using numerical values as continuous, rather than categorical, would more accurately predict relapse risk. Previous work (Loh, ASH 2020) described validation of a continuous prognostic index (PI) for risk of relapse published by UK investigators incorporating favorable and unfavorable genetics, white blood cell count (WBC), and D29 BM as continuous variables (O'Connor, JCO 2018; Enshaei, Blood 2020), and assessed the added value of D8 PB. We now extend this work by comparing patient outcomes with current COG risk classification to PI-derived risk classifications on the previously described population (Loh, ASH 2020). We first retrospectively classified patients (pts) (N=21,199 from prior COG trials AALL0331/0232 or AALL0932/1131 enrolled 2004-2019) in our analysis population using the COG risk stratification algorithm employed in the current generation of COG trials. Pts with Down syndrome or BCR/ABL1 were excluded. We classified our analysis population as SR-Favorable [SR-Fav, 24.5% (5-year relapse free survival (RFS) probability 0.97)], SR-Favorable/Average (not distinguishable because of missing D8 PB) [SR-Fav/Avg, 5.3% (.96)] , SR-Avg [20.5% (0.93)], SR-High [12.5% (0.83)] , HR-Fav [3.0% (0.96)], HR [29.6% (0.82)] , and Very HR [VHR, 1.1% (0.54)] according to NCI RG, CNS status, cytogenetics, D8 PB where relevant, D29 BM, and EOC MRD. Ninety-seven percent of pts had sufficient data to be retrospectively classified and thus 20,176 pts were considered for subsequent analyses. We next developed a multivariable model for RFS using log transformed MRD (τ(MRD)). Temporal external validation was first employed by developing models considering AALL0932/1131 data (n=12,453) and then validating them with AALL0331/0232 data (n=7,723). Of the full cohort of 20,176 pts, 24.4% could not be classified by COG PI, primarily due to missing D8 PB MRD which was not assessed routinely in earlier studies; thus the model was developed on 11,151 pts and validated on 4,103 pts. The COG PI (PI COG) was calculated using the equation [τ(d8 MRD) x -0.036 + τ(d29 MRD) x -0.119 + CYTO-GR x -0.914 + CYTO-HR x 0.752 + WBC log x 0.178]. The UK PI (PI UK) was also calculated using published coefficients [τ(d29 MRD) x -0.218 + CYTO-GR x -0.440 + CYTO-HR x 1.066 + WBC log x 0.138] for comparison to assess the practical significance of adding D8 PB. In contrast to the UK method, we identified risk groups by selecting PI cutoffs that maximized the discrimination of the predictive model as quantified by the concordance probability estimator (CPE) (Barrio, SORT 2017). This objective method of cutpoint determination allows for risk group definition without investigator agreement on exact prespecified risk group characteristics; this method also defined four risk groups (Low, Standard, Intermediate, and High). Cutpoints derived from the two different indices, applied to the pts who could be classified by PI COG (n=15,254), resulted in different proportions of pts in each of the risk groups with generally similar RFS estimates for each group. Using cutpoints estimated for PI COG (-2.073, -1.307, and -0.857) 36.0% (RFS = 0.97) were classified as low, 29.6% (0.93) standard, 17.1% (0.88) intermediate, and 17.4% (0.73) high risk of relapse. For PI UK ( -2.916, -2.534, and -1.15), among those who were classifiable by PI COG, 33.4% (0.97) were classified as low, 26.3% (0.93) standard, 30% (0.87) intermediate, and 10.4% (0.69) high. Finally, we compared the COG risk stratification to PI CPE-defined risk stratification in the cohort. As shown in the table, PI COG improves discrimination among individuals by identifying groups with different relapse risk than expected. The PI COG can thus identify patients for whom therapeutic intensification may not result in significantly better outcomes while improving the discrimination of HR pts to allow randomized interventions with achievable hazard ratios. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borowitz: Amgen, Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria. Zweidler-McKay: ImmunoGen: Current Employment. Mullighan: AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Illumina: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hunger: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: DSMB member.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 137-137
    Abstract: Abstract 137 COG AALL0031 generated an outstanding 80% 3 yr event free survival for children with Ph+ ALL treated with imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the 2nd generation BCR-ABL1/SRC kinase inhibitor dasatinib would improve Ph+ ALL outcomes compared to imatinib due to increased potency, better CNS penetration, and activity against many imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 point mutations. AALL0622 tested the safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to AALL0031 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed children and young adults (1–30 years) with Ph+ ALL. Safety and feasibility were defined as 〉 5 out of 6 patients (pts) completing 23 weeks of treatment through Intensification Block 1 without having a protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT). In Cohort 1, dasatinib (60 mg/m2 once/day) was given discontinuously (the 1st 2 weeks of every 3–4 week block) starting on Induction day 15. Enrollment in Cohort 1 continued until 6 evaluable pts completed Intensification 1 (23 weeks of therapy) and were assessed for toxicity. Two of the first 6 pts experienced DLTs (treatment delays) following the 2nd high dose methotrexate (HD MTX) given on day 15 of Intensification 1. Amendment 2 removed day 15 HD MTX in Intensification 1 and 2. After this, discontinuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) was found to be safe and feasible, and pts were then enrolled on Cohort 2 to test continuous dasatinib. The first 6 evaluable Cohort 2 pts who completed therapy through Intensification 1 with continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) had no significant treatment delays, but one pt experienced a DLT (grade 4 sensory neuropathy) during Consolidation 1. No induction deaths occurred in either cohort. The safety phase, completed in 10/2011, established the safety and feasibility of continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) integrated with the intensive phases of the modified AALL0031 backbone. After the Cohort 1 safety phase was completed, a patient developed leukoencephalopathy, transient speech impairment, motor weakness and gait disturbance after receiving HD MTX during Intensification 2. The gait and motor impairment persisted suggesting that it could be attributed to an interaction between dasatinib and HD MTX. Subsequently, no Cohort 2 pts experienced leukoencephalopathy in 70 treatment blocks containing HD MTX. Transient neurotoxicity (including ≥ grade 2 seizure, encephalopathy, cognitive disturbance, or altered level of consciousness) was seen in 8/34 (24%) Cohort 1 pts, who completed Consolidation 1 prior to Amendment 5, after receiving ifosfamide, etoposide, and triple intrathecal therapy (ITT). Because of the temporal relationship with ifosfamide and ITT, and the intensified CNS prophylaxis on AAL0622 relative to AALL0031 at the beginning of Consolidation 1, these events were attributed to the chemotherapy backbone and not dasatinib. After Amendment 5 which omitted day 1 Consolidation ITT and substituted IT MTX for ITT on Induction day 29, only 4% (1/25 pts including 4 remaining Cohort 1 and 21 Cohort 2 pts), experienced neurotoxicity (grade 2 seizure). Non-hematological Grade 4 toxicities included a Cohort 1 pt who developed Grade 4 prolonged QTc interval with adenovirus associated diarrhea, hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia during Maintenance 2. Dasatinib was held and prolonged QTc resolved. Another Cohort 1 pt developed grade 4 jaundice during Maintenance 6 that also resolved after holding 6-MP, MTX and dasatinib. Both of these pts continued therapy without recurrent toxicity. Twelve Cohort 1 pts have completed 2 1/2 years of protocol therapy and tolerated discontinuous dose dasatinib well during Maintenance. No pts have had effusions, heart failure, or pulmonary hypertension. AALL0622 enrolled 60 eligible pts (39 on Cohort 1; 21 on Cohort 2). Importantly, we recently reported that early introduction of TKI on day 15 of induction and substitution of dasatinib for imatinib on AALL0622 led to improved induction remission rates from 89% to 98% compared to all Ph+ pts on AALL0031, end induction negative minimal residual disease (MRD) rates ( 〈 0.01% by flow) from 25% to 59%, and end Consolidation 2 negative MRD rates from 71% to 89% when comparing AALL0031 Cohorts 3–5 to AALL0622 Cohorts 1 and 2. Based on the promising early response and safety data and concerns about long-term toxicity of the AALL0031 backbone, a joint COG/EsPhALL trial is underway testing the efficacy and safety of continuous dasatinib (60mg/m2) on a less intensive EsPhALL backbone. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Dasatinib is indicated for newly diagnosed adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. The effectiveness of SPRYCEL in these patients is based on a study that measured two types of response to treatment (cytogenetic and molecular) by 1 year. The study is ongoing to find out how dasatinib works over a longer period of time Dasatinib is also indicated for Ph+ CML patients who are no longer benefitting from, or did not tolerate, other treatment including Gleevec® (imatinib mesylate). Loh:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hunger:Bristol Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 286-286
    Abstract: Introduction: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients ( & gt;16 years of age) with high-risk B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR B-ALL) have inferior outcomes compared to HR B-ALL patients 1-15 years of age, primarily due to relapse and toxicity. In a prior Children's Oncology Group (COG) HR B-ALL study 1961 (1996 - 2002), 12.7% of patients were AYA (ages 16 - 21 years) with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 71.5% and 77.5% respectively. Here we report the outcomes of the most recently completed HR B-ALL COG study AALL0232, comparing AYA and younger patients. Methods: COG study AALL0232 was a Phase 3 randomized trial for patients 1-30 years of age with newly diagnosed HR B-ALL utilizing a 2 x 2 factorial design with an augmented intensityBerlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) backbone. Patients were randomized to two weeks of dexamethasone versus four weeks of prednisone during Induction therapy and high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) versus escalating Capizzi methotrexate plus pegaspargase (C-MTX) during Interim Maintenance I. Between 2004 and 2011, 3,154 patients enrolled, with 3,081 eligible and evaluable for induction. AYA patients comprised 20% (16-21 years, n= 558; 22-30 years, n=47). Results: The study was amended in 2008 due to an excess incidence of osteonecrosis observed in patients older than 10 years of age who were randomized to dexamethasone. Thereafter, they were nonrandomly assigned to prednisone during induction. The dexamethasone delivered during delayed intensification was also rescheduled from continuous (days 1-14) to discontinuous (days 1-8 and 15-22) delivery. 5-year EFS and OS were 65.1% and 76.9% for AYA patients compared to 77.9% and 87.1% for younger patients (p & lt;0.0001) (Figures 1 and 2). 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 18.4% for AYA patients and 13.4% for younger patients (p=0.005), largely due to marrow relapse (13.8% versus 9.0%; p & lt;0.0001). Additionally, fewer AYA patients achieved remission ( & lt;5% blasts) at end of Induction, (95.7% versus 97.2%; p=0.078). Day 29 bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) & lt;0.01% was achieved in 55.9% of AYA patients compared to 73.9% of younger patients and MRD & gt;1.0% to & lt;10% was reported in 14.8% of AYA compared to 7.3% of non-AYA (p & lt;0.001). Although there was no significant difference in induction mortality (2.5% versus 1.7%; p=0.20), post-induction remission deaths due to toxicity were significantly higher in AYA (5.8% versus 2.6%; p=0.0002). Compared to younger patients, AYAs were more likely to have Ph-like features (17.5% versus 12.1%, p=0.032) and less likely to have ETV6-RUNX1 fusions (3.9% versus 16.3%, p & lt;0.0001). Conclusions: The COG trial AALL0232, which enrolled the largest number of AYA patients to date on a pediatric B-ALL study, demonstrated significantly inferior survival and greater rates of treatment related toxicity compared to younger patients. Although treatment intensification strategies have improved outcomes in younger patients, these have not translated into the same survival benefit in those older. The higher incidence of Ph-like genomic lesions in this group of patients potentially offers a therapeutic opportunity to incorporate targeted therapies for AYA. Thus, future trials must identify novel strategies to not only improve outcomes but further reduce toxicity in the AYA cohort. Disclosures Burke: Amgen, Inc.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Raetz:Pfizer: Research Funding. Gastier Foster:Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS): Other: Commercial Research; Incyte Corporation: Other: Commercial Research. Borowitz:Beckman Coulter: Honoraria. Hunger:Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 4-4
    Abstract: Ph+ ALL remains one of the highest risk subsets of childhood ALL. The COG AALL0031 protocol (open 2002 – 2006) gave imatinib at 340 mg/m2 for an increasing number of days in combination with an intensive chemotherapy backbone. Cohorts received 42 days of imatinib exposure (Cohort 1 N= 8), 63 days (Cohort 2 N=12), 84 days (Cohort 3 N=11), 126 days (Cohort 4 N=12) and 280 continuous days (Cohort 5 N=50) prior to maintenance therapy. If an HLA-identical sibling donor was available, a BMT was performed after the first two cycles of therapy post induction otherwise chemotherapy was continued. BMT patients received imatinib starting 4 – 6 months post BMT for a 6 month duration. Ninety-three patients were treated, 10 of whom had failed induction (induction failures were removed from the following analyses). We observed that MRD positivity ( 〈 0.01%) was significantly lower (p = 0.0002) after consolidation block 1 and after consolidation block 2 (p = 0.007) in Cohorts 3 – 5 (imatinib in consolidation blocks 1 & 2) versus Cohorts 1/2 combined (no imatinib in consolidation blocks 1 & 2). Early EFS improved with increasing imatinib exposure with a 1 year EFS of 70.6±11.1% for Cohorts 1 & 2, 90.9±6.4% for Cohorts 3 & 4, and 95.3±3.6% for Cohort 5 (p = 0.02). The 1 year EFS for Cohort 5 was significantly higher than for historical controls from previous COG studies (N=56; 1 year EFS 65.7±6,4%; p = 0.006). Twenty-one patients had matched sibling transplants (8 of 43 in Cohorts 1 – 4 and 13 of 44 in Cohort 5). Eleven of 83 (13%) patients were removed from protocol by treating institutions for alternative donor BMT. Intent-to-treat analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in early outcome between those patients in Cohort 5 treated without sibling donor BMT compared to patients who received a matched sibling donor BMT (p = 0.26). The related donor BMT group treated with 6 months of Imatinib post BMT had a higher 1 year EFS compared to a comparable historical BMT group receiving no Imatinib on prior pediatric cooperative group protocol with a 1 year EFS 78%. Cohort 5 chemotherapy treatment group outcomes were not significantly affected after removal of patients receiving off protocol BMT. We conclude that imatinib given in combination with intensive chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in early EFS and reduction in early MRD. Post BMT imatinib also improved early outcome in related donor BMT. Intensive imatinib with intensive chemotherapy gives equivalent early EFS to patients treated with allogeniec related or alternative donor BMT. Longer observation will be required to see if this results in a difference in long term EFS. Outcome in patients on COG protocol, AALL0031 Therapy given N 1 year EFS SE Intent-to-treat analysis - Cohort 5 Chemotherapy with continuous dosing imatinib (includes 6 patients removed from study for alternative donor BMT) 31 96.7% 3.5% Intent-to-treat analysis - Sibling BMT (all Cohorts) 21 95.0% 5.3% Cohort 5 (with removal of alternative donor BMT patients) 25 95.8% 4.3% Off protocol alternative donor BMT (all cohorts) 11 81.8% 12.3%
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 39-40
    Abstract: Current risk stratification for COG ALL patients (pts) relies on National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk group (RG) at diagnosis, somatic genetics, and early response to therapy as measured by specific thresholds of minimal residual disease (MRD) using flow cytometry on day 8 peripheral blood (D8 PB) and day 29 bone marrow (D29 BM). NCI RG is defined as age 1-10 years (yrs) and white blood cell count (WBC) & lt;50,000/uL (Standard Risk, SR); all other non-infant patients are high risk (HR). Using COG risk stratification, current therapies for SR and HR patients are based on 5-year projected event-free survival (EFS) of 92-97%, and 65-86%. Currently, two subsets, Ph-like and very high risk (VHR) ALL are identified with additional assays-genomic sequencing for Ph-like, and persistent BM MRD on D29 and at end of consolidation for VHR, and are eligible for different treatments. However, as UK investigators recently published (O'Connor, JCO 2018; Enshaei, Blood 2020), using multiple continuous variables as threshold-defined categorical data may diminish the power of accurately predicting relapse, and thus prescribe inappropriate post induction therapy. We tested the UK approach of transforming categorical variables into continuous data on 13,870 NCI SR and 7308 NCI HR B-ALL pts treated on two generations of COG trials: AALL0331 (SR; n=5094), AALL0932 (SR; n=8776), AALL0232 (HR; n=2883), and AALL1131 (HR; n=4425). Down syndrome and Ph+ pts were excluded from analysis. Clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. ETV6-RUNX1 (25.24%) and double trisomies of chromosome 4, 10 (DT) (23.77%) comprised the favorable risk genetic RG (FRG) group (48.15% of risk classified) while KTM2A rearranged (1.71%), hypodiploidy (1.67%), and iAMP21 (2.56%) comprised the unfavorable risk genetic RG (URG) (6.26%). All others with genetic information were classified as intermediate risk genetic RG (IRG) (45.59% of risk classified). Among 4873 pts tested, 20.46% had Ph-like ALL. D8 PB and D29 BM MRD data were available for 76.42% and 96.69% pts, respectively. We first log transformed WBC, D8 and D29 MRD and displayed these by treatment protocol, NCI RG, and FRG/URG (separating out Ph-like independently). Age and WBC followed the normal expected distribution with the median age of SR pts 4.0 yrs (range 1-9) and HR 12 yrs (range 1-30). Transformed MRD was displayed as a variable t(MRD), corresponding to the negative log; max t(D29 MRD) was 13.82, corresponding to MRD & lt;1.0 x 10-5.The great majority of pts were MRD-positive at D8 (mean t(D8 MRD) 7.42); but there was broad distribution of values, with NCI SR and FRG pts having lower t(D8 MRD) (mean 7.52 and 8.08) than NCI HR and URG pts (mean 7.20 and 6.56) (p & lt; 0.001) . The great majority of pts were D29 MRD-negative (mean t(D29 MRD) 12.08), with NCI SR and FRG pts achieving lower D29 MRD (mean t(D29 MRD) 12.43 and 12.73) than NCI HR and URG pts (mean 11.40 and 10.95) (p & lt; 0.0001). Ph-like ALL pts had a mean t(D8 MRD) and t(D29 MRD) of 6.22 and 9.37. We next conducted a univariate analysis for risk factors for relapse, including sex, age, WBClog, CNS status, protocol-defined rapid early response status, FRG, URG, t(D8 MRD), and t(D29 MRD); all variables except CNS status were significant p & lt; 0.0001). Multivariable modeling showed that WBClog, FRG, URG, t(D8 MRD), t(D29 MRD) retained significance (p & lt; 0.0001). Finally, we applied the UK Prognostic Index (PIUKALL) equation [t(d29 MRD) x -0.218 + CYTO-GR x -0.440 + CYTO-HR x 1.066 + WBClog x 0.138] to the COG data using protocol, NCI RG, FRG, URG, IRG, or Ph-like RG in the model and validated the trends for relapse-free survival (RFS), which were similar in our groups with an overall median PIUKALL of -2.63 ( mean -2.32, SD -.90, min -3.54, max 1.79). We next added in t(D8 MRD) to define a PICOG and determined that D8 PB MRD added significantly to the model, mostly through discriminating between the hazard ratios of the FRG and the URG RGs. Importantly, the D8 PB MRD led to a qualitatively more distinctive group with a potentially lower predicted RFS in NCI SR pts, a group that has been more difficult to predict in the past, and yet comprises nearly half of all relapse events. Our analyses of 21,178 COG B-ALL pts confirm and extend the utility of integrating WBC and MRD as continuous rather than categorical values to refine risk stratification for patient treatment and trial design. Disclosures Loh: Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borowitz:Amgen: Honoraria. Zweidler-McKay:ImmunoGen, Inc.: Current Employment. Mattano:Melinta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hunger:Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Raetz:Celgene/BMS: Other; Pfizer: Research Funding. Mullighan:Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 35-35
    Abstract: Background: With current multi-agent chemotherapy, 88-90% of children diagnosed with High Risk B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (HR B-ALL) will be cured. However, for those patients who relapse, ~ 1/3 will have central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Thus, adequate CNS disease control for children with HR B-ALL remains a challenge. AALL1131 was designed to determine if the administration of post-Induction age-adjusted triple intrathecal therapy (ITT) with methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine, on a modified augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (MBFM) backbone, would improve 5-year disease free survival (DFS) of children with HR B-ALL compared to age-adjusted intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX) alone. Methods: Patients with HR B-ALL included: National Cancer Institute (NCI) HR patients 〈 13 years of age at diagnosis without adverse prognostic features [CNS leukemia at diagnosis (≥ 5 white blood cells in the cerebral spinal fluid with blasts on cytospin and/or clinical signs of CNS leukemia), iAMP21, KMT2A (MLL) rearrangement, or hypodiploidy ( 〈 44 chromosomes and/or DNA index 〈 0.81)] who had bone marrow minimal residual disease (BM MRD) 〈 0.01% on Induction day 29; and NCI standard risk (SR) patients lacking favorable cytogenetics (ETV6-RUNX1 fusion or trisomy of chromosomes 4 and 10) who had peripheral blood MRD ≥1% on day 8 and BM MRD 〈 0.01% on Induction day 29, and NCI SR B-ALL patients with favorable cytogenetics who had BM MRD ≥0.01% on Induction day 29. Newly diagnosed children with HR B-ALL were randomized post-Induction in a 1:1 fashion to receive ITT versus IT MTX. A total of 21-26 doses of post-Induction intrathecal therapy was administered during Consolidation (n=4), Interim Maintenance (n=2), Delayed Intensification (n=3), and Maintenance (n=12 for girls, n=16 for boys). Results: The post-Induction HR B-ALL randomization was closed to accrual on March 19, 2018 following planned interim monitoring that revealed a futility boundary was crossed, concluding the inability to show the superiority of ITT compared to IT MTX. Five-year DFS rates for IT MTX versus ITT were 93±3.8% and 90±4.3%, p value=0.86. The corresponding estimated hazard ratio (HR) of IT MTX vs ITT is 1.285; 95% CI of (0.822, 2.01). There were no differences in toxicities observed in patients receiving ITT compared to IT MTX. As such, the study was amended to prescribe IT MTX to all patients. Conclusion: The administration of post-induction age adjusted ITT did not improve 5-year DFS of children with HR B-ALL without CNS leukemia. IT MTX remains the standard of care for CNS prophylaxis. Disclosures Burke: Shire: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Speakers Bureau.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 911-911
    Abstract: Background: VHR patients eligible for COG AALL0031 had an expected 5-year EFS ≤ 40% and consisted of those with Ph+ ALL, severe hypodiploidy ( 〈 44 chromosomes), and induction failure (IF) with 〉 25% blasts at the end of standard induction therapy. Patients with hypodiploidy and IF are the subject of this report. Ph+ patients were reported previously (Blood Schultz KR, et. al. Blood2006; 108:87a.). Methods: Between 10/14/02 and 10/20/06, 63 evaluable patients (41 hypodiploidy and 22 IF) were enrolled in AALL0031 after completion of a 3- or 4-drug induction, and begun on an intensive chemotherapy regimen. Induction failure patients not entering complete remission (CR) after the first two chemotherapy cycles, ifosfamide and etoposide (cycle 1) and IV cyclophosphamide, IV etoposide) followed by high dose methotrexate and high dose cytarabine (cycle 2), were removed from study. Remission patients were assigned to 8 cycles of standard maintenance. All patients received triple intrathecal chemotherapy followed by cranial irradiation. An HLA-identical blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), by donor availability or to an intensive ~2.2 year chemotherapy regimen. The intensive chemotherapy regimen included a reinduction block (daunomycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, L-asparaginase, dexamethasone), intensification block [IV methotrexate (Mtx), etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high dose cytarabine, L-asparaginase], with each block repeated followed by 4 cycles of intensive maintenance (high dose Mtx, PO Mtx, IV vincristine, PO 6-MP). Unrelated donor BMT was not an option on AALL0031. Results: Twenty-one of 22 (95%) IF patients achieved CR after two cycles of therapy. Of these, 12 continued chemotherapy, 2 underwent BMT, and 7 were taken off protocol for an unrelated donor BMT. At 2-years, the EFS for IF patients was chemotherapy (46±17%) or related/unrelated donor BMT (67±17%; p = 0.50). Twenty-eight hypodiploidy patients continued chemotherapy, 12 underwent related donor BMT and 1 was taken off protocol for an unrelated donor BMT. For hypodiploid patients, the 2 year EFS was 57±10% for those receiving chemotherapy compared to related/unrelated donor BMT (67±14%, p=0.74). These outcomes compared favorably with COG historical controls (n=16, 44±12%; p=0.30). We lack a COG historical control for a comparison with IF patients. We examined minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of cycle 2 in patients undergoing related/unrelated BMT and those receiving chemotherapy. With MRD 〉 0.01% (n=9) and 〈 0.01% (n=6), 2-year EFS was 56±19% and 83±15% (p=0.27), respectively. Chemotherapy groups showed a 2 year EFS for 〉 0.01% of 57±22% (N = 7) compared to 53±12% for ≤ 0.01% (N=19; p =0.83). Conclusions: The AALL0031 regimen attained a very high CR (95%) for IF patients. Small number severely limited statistical power. We found better outcomes for AALL0031 versus historical data, for allogeneic BMT versus chemotherapy, and MRD negativity versus positivity in BMT patients, although none were statistically significant. Future strategies focused on inducing lower MRD early in therapy may improve outcomes for both chemotherapy and BMT. International collaborations to allow for higher patient accrual should be considered.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...