GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 6_suppl ( 2022-02-20), p. 408-408
    Abstract: 408 Background: Metastatic non-seminomatous testicular tumor patients with residual retroperitoneal tumor masses 〉 1cm after chemotherapy are treated with pcRPLND. The goal of pcRPLND is to remove viable tumors (V) and teratoma (T), which are present in approximately 10% and 40% of cases, respectively. However, histopathologically, only scar/necrosis (N) is identified in the remaining 50% of patients. In those patients, surgical therapy is not necessary, resulting in a relevant overtreatment. So far, no adequate distinction between the histologies exists preoperatively. Recently, the first biomarker was described with miR371a-3p in serum, which is highly specific for V, but not for T. Therefore, our goal was to identify mRNAs and proteins that are differentially expressed between V/T vs N, in particular between T and N, in pcRPLND resected cells. Methods: Forty-eight patients were identified, n = 16 each with T/V/N. Representative regions of T/V/N were microdissected and subsequently mRNA was extracted. Initially, 770 genes were analyzed using the nCounter PanCancer Progression Panel (Nanostring). For each group comparison, genes with a fold change of 〈 -2/ 〉 2 and a p-value of 〈 0.05 were identified. Hereafter, quantitative protein analysis (proteomics) was performed on the same samples. Finally, the proteins of the 5 mRNAs with the most different and significant expression levels between T vs. N were validated by immunohistochemistry and H-score calculation. Results: By Nanostring, we identified 84 significantly differentially expressed mRNAs for the group comparisons of T vs. N, 63 for V vs. N, and 189 for T vs. V. Quantitative protein analysis revealed 25 significantly differentially expressed proteins in T vs. N, 254 in V vs. N, and 134 between T vs. V. By immunohistochemistry, all 5 antibodies showed significantly increased H scores when comparing T vs. N and T vs. V. In accordance with the objective, we found two proteins, AGR2 and KRT19, with their corresponding genes that showed significantly differential expressions for the comparison of T vs. N in both, quantitative protein analysis and Nanostring mRNA analysis, and were successfully validated by immunohistochemistry. Conclusions: With AGR2 and KRT19, we have identified two proteins with their corresponding genes that are significantly and differentially expressed in the pcRPLND specimen in the clinically relevant groups T vs. N. Both were successfully validated by immunohistochemistry. In addition, further group differences (T vs. V/ V vs. N) were revealed depending on the analytical method. In perspective, these proteins could be targeted by radiolabeled ligands as a tracer in order to reliably distinguish patients with teratoma from those with necrosis by means of functional imaging. Thus, overtreatment with pcRPLND of patients with N could be safely reduced.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 32-32
    Abstract: 32 Background: Risk stratification for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) through MR-TRUS fusion biopsy still relies on Gleason (GL) grading of the biopsy specimens. GL grading of the same sample can differ between pathologists. In our tertiary high-volume center GL grading of the biopsy specimens is crucial for further therapy planning. Methods: Reference pathology of 42 patients after transperineal MR-TURS fusion plus saturation biopsy was assessed by one specialized genitourinary pathologist. GL grading of the original pathology and the reference pathology for the saturation and targeted biopsy cores were compared. Risk groups for this study were set as GL 6 for low, GL 7a and GL 7b for intermediate and GL 8, GL 9 and GL 10 for high-risk. Results: In 42 patients 49 lesions were identified by mpMRI (PI-RADS 3-5) in which 150 biopsy cores were taken. In addition, 709 cores were taken as saturation biopsies. The highest GL grading per patient differed in 18 (43 %) of the cases. In 16 cases, there was a difference within the targeted biopsies but only in 8 cases there was a difference in the saturation biopsies. In 6 cases both saturation and fusion biopsies were different. Taking risk stratification into account there was a misclassification with low- and intermediate risk in 9 (21 %) cases, an intermediate- and high risk in 2 cases and a misclassification within the same risk group in 6 (14 %) cases. In 16 of the 18 differences there was an upgrading of the Gleason score by the reference pathologist whereas only in 2 cases there was a downgrading. Conclusions: The data shows that in times of mpMRIs and transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies it still is the GL score graded by the pathologist who accounts for many potential therapy plan mistakes. In this study 21 % of the patients were misclassified as GL 6 while reference pathology graded for GL 7a or GL 7b. The demonstrated data suggests that there should be a reference pathology at least for every GL 6 cancer and that the quality of GL grading should be monitored. Also this data again addresses the need for a better risk stratification irrespective of the GL score that can be done in a more objective way with less potential for misclassification.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 6_suppl ( 2022-02-20), p. 421-421
    Abstract: 421 Background: Our objective was to identify a combination of microRNAs (miRNA) to differentiate between viable tumor (V) or teratoma (T) and necrosis/fibrosis (N) in pcRPLND specimens of metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) patients with residual masses ≥1cm after chemotherapy. Our hypothesis is that a biomarker guided therapy could reduce overtreatment with pcRPLND in patients with only N. Methods: Forty-eight patients were identified, n = 16 each with T/V/N. Representative regions of T/V/N were microdissected, subsequently total RNA was isolated and miRNA expression was analyzed for miR-371a-3p, 375-3p, and 375-5p using qPCR. ROC analysis was performed for each miRNA and for all combinations in order to determine the discriminatory capacity of V and T vs. N. Results: For the group comparisons of V vs. N miR-371a-3p achieved the highest fold change (FC) of 31.1 (p = 0.023) while for T vs. N miR-375-5p performed best (FC 64,2; p 〈 0.001). Likewise, the most accurate AUC for V was 0.75 using miR-371a-3p, for T 0.80 using miR-375-5p. Combining the best performing miRNAs for V and T resulted in an AUC of 0.94 with a sensitivity of 93.75, specificity of 93.75, PPV of 96.8 and NPV of 83.3. Conclusions: In pcRPLND tissue samples V and T could be distinguished from necrosis/fibrosis by combining miR-371a-3p and miR-375-5p with great accuracy. This combination of miRNAs might serve as new biomarker in the future, in order to spare miRNA-negative patients from pcRPLND. However, further studies analyzing patient’s serum are needed to confirm the clinical impact of these biomarkers.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 6_suppl ( 2023-02-20), p. 412-412
    Abstract: 412 Background: Metastatic non-seminomatous testicular tumor patients with residual retroperitoneal tumor masses 〉 1cm after chemotherapy are treated with pcRPLND. The goal of pcRPLND is to remove viable tumors (V) and teratoma (T), which are present in approximately 10% and 40% of cases, respectively. However, histopathologically, only scar/necrosis (N) is identified in the remaining 50% of patients. In those patients, surgical therapy is not necessary, resulting in a relevant overtreatment. So far, no adequate distinction between the histologies exists preoperatively. Recently, the first biomarker was described with miR371a-3p in serum, which is highly specific for V, but not for T. In 2022 we reported AGR2 and KRT19 to be significantly and differentially expressed in teratoma compared to necrosis in pcRPLND tissue on protein and mRNA level. The aim of this study was to validate these proteins on an independent cohort. Methods: All consecutive pcRPLND patients from 2021 who were treated in the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany, were selected (n=66). All patients had residual masses 〉 1 cm and normalized or plateaued tumor markers. For immunohistochemistry, the monoclonal antibodies KRT19 and AGR2 were applied to representative Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded tissue. To quantify the results, the H-score was used. The investigators were blinded to the final pathohistological results. Results: The cohort was composed of 66 patients, 23 patients with T, 24 patients with V and 19 patients with N. Significantly higher H-scores were shown for AGR2 and KRT19 when comparing T vs. N and T vs. V (both p 〈 0.0001). The discriminatory ability of the two proteins AGR2 and KRT19 was calculated by AUCs for T vs. N and was 1.0 in each case with a corresponding sensitivity and specificity for T of 100%. Conclusions: With AGR2 and KRT19, we could validate the two proteins that are significantly and differentially expressed in the pcRPLND specimen in the clinically relevant groups T vs. N. In perspective, these proteins could be targeted by radiolabeled ligands as a tracer in order to reliably distinguish patients with teratoma from those with necrosis by means of functional imaging. Thus, overtreatment with pcRPLND of patients with N could be safely reduced.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 349-349
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 349-349
    Abstract: 349 Background: An upregulation of vimentin 3, a truncated version of the full length vimentin, with an unknown function, was previously described by our group, in a direct dependency of increased ET-1 levels. We analyzed now vimentin 3 in further genitourinary cancers. Here, we describe our findings how vimentin 3 is part of the signaling pathways from Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and the Endothelin-A-Receptor (ETAR) and how it correlates with aggressive tumor behavior in a PCa cell culture and in human tissue and serum samples from PCa patients. Methods: DU145 cells were cultured. We stimulated with ET-1 with and without artificial downregulation of the ETAR, the ETBR or both receptors. A scratch assay was performed to demonstrate the influence of ET-1. Proteins were then extracted and WB for vimentin full length and vimentin 3 was performed. Additionally we analyzed ET-1 and vimentin 3 in serum from prostate cancer patients using ELISA and we did IF and IHC staining for vimentin 3 in human prostate cancer tissue. Results: Treatment with ET-1 and downregulation of the ETBR lead to a significant increased migration of DU145 cells after 3 and 6 h. The corresponding WB showed increased vimentin 3. ELISA showed increased levels of ET-1 in samples of prostate cancer patients compared to patients with no cancer history. ELISA could also demonstrate elevated levels of vimentin 3 in serum of patients with local disease and significantly elevated values in metastatic prostate cancer patients compared to patients with no cancer history. Conclusions: The data presented shows that ET-1 stimulation leads to overexpression of vimentin 3 in prostate cancer cell cultures and a concomitant aggressive biological behavior. Here we previously described the direct interaction of Vimentin 3 in prostate cancer and the activation mechanism via ET-1 and the ETAR. IHC, IF show an upregulation of the truncated variant Vimentin3 in tissue samples. In an Vimentin 3 ELISA we could show that this truncated variant is increased and therefore represents a potential biomarker. Highest values of vimentin 3 were measured using ELISA in serum of patients with recurrent and metastatic disease also suggesting that vimentin 3 correlates with aggressive tumor behavior.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...