GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (4)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (4)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of GEM20110714 Phase III Study
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 29 ( 2021-10-10), p. 3273-3282
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 29 ( 2021-10-10), p. 3273-3282
    Abstract: GEM20110714 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01528618 ), the first randomized, phase III study of systemic chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), reported significant progression-free survival improvement with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.68; P 〈 .001). Data from the final analysis of overall survival (OS) are presented here. METHODS From February 2012 to October 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to receive either GP (gemcitabine 1 g/m 2 once daily on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) or FP (fluorouracil 4 g/m 2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) once every 21 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which has been previously reported; OS was a secondary end point. RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 69.5 months with GP and 69.7 months with FP, 148 (81.8%) and 166 (91.7%) deaths occurred in the GP and FP arms, respectively. The estimated hazard ratio for OS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; two-sided P = .004). The median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 25.0 months) with GP versus 18.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 to 21.7 months) with FP. The OS probabilities at 1, 3, and 5 years were 79.9% versus 71.8%, 31.0% versus 20.4%, and 19.2% versus 7.8%, respectively. Poststudy therapy was administered in 51.9% and 55.2% of patients in the GP and FP arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Among patients with previously untreated advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, those who receive GP have longer OS than those receive FP. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin should be considered a preferred front-line option for these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00396
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JUPITER-02: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of toripalimab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 18_suppl ( 2021-06-20), p. LBA2-LBA2
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 18_suppl ( 2021-06-20), p. LBA2-LBA2
    Abstract: LBA2 Background: Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard 1 st line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided durable responses in patients (pts) with r/m NPC as monotherapy in the ≥2 nd line setting (POLARIS-02 study). The results of JUPITER-02, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase III trial of toripalimab in combination with GP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for r/m NPC are summarized. Methods: Pts with advanced NPC with no prior chemotherapy in the r/m setting were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg or placebo d1 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 d1, d8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 d1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG PS (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC in the ITT population. Secondary end points included ORR, DOR and OS. There was one prespecified interim analysis of PFS at 130 PFS events with a planned final analysis at 200 PFS events. Results: 289 pts were randomized: 146 to the toripalimab arm and 143 to the placebo arm. By May 30, 2020 as the interim analysis cutoff date, the median treatment duration was 39 weeks in the toripalimab arm and 36 weeks in the placebo arm. A significant improvement in PFS was detected for the toripalimab arm compared to the placebo arm (HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.36-0.74] two-sided p = 0.0003), with median PFS of 11.7 vs. 8.0 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 49% and 28% respectively. An improvement in PFS was observed across relevant subgroups, including all PD-L1 subgroups. The ORR was 77.4% vs. 66.4% (P = 0.033) and the median DOR was 10.0 vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.78] ). As of Jan 15, 2021, OS was not mature, with 25 deaths in the toripalimab arm and 35 in the placebo arm (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.41-1.14], P = 0.14). The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.0% vs 89.5%); AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (7.5% vs 4.9%); and fatal AEs (2.7% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms; however, immune-related (irAEs) (39.7% vs. 18.9%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (7.5% vs. 0.7%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1 st -line treatment for pts with advanced NPC provided superior PFS and ORR and longer DOR than GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.LBA2
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Anlotinib hydrochloride combined with tislelizumab, paclitaxel liposome, and nedaplatin regimen for preoperative neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal cancer: A single-arm, single-center, phase II exploratory clinical study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e16082-e16082
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e16082-e16082
    Abstract: e16082 Background: Local recurrence and distant metastasis are important causes of high mortality in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Based on the clinical data of anlotinib (a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and tislelizumab (anti-pd-1 antibodies), paclitaxel liposome (a cytotoxic anti-tumor drugs) and nedaplatin (a platinum-based anti-tumor drugs) in patients with esophageal cancer, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with tislelizumab, paclitaxel liposome and nedaplatin in preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for patients with stage IIB-IVA esophageal cancer. Methods: This study included 18-75 years old, ECOG PS 0-1 patients with potentially resectable stage IIB-IVA esophageal cancer with a predicted survival time of ≥12 weeks and confirmed by histopathology or cytology. Patients who met the inclusion criteria received anlotinib (oral, 12mg/d1-14,Q3W) combined with tislelizumab (intravenous drip, 200mg/d1,Q3W), paclitaxel liposome (intravenous drip, 175mg/m2/d1,Q3W) and nedaplatin (intravenous drip, 80mg/m2/d1,Q3W). After 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, surgery was performed, and 4-6 weeks of chemotherapy combined with targeted immune adjuvant therapy was performed after the operation, and then Anlotinib combined with tislelizumab targeted immune maintenance therapy was performed until the disease progressed. Subjects who failed to complete at least one cycle of clinical trials according to this program due to non-experimental drug factors, and seriously violated this research program, such as: failure to follow the prescribed dose, method and course of medication, will be excluded from this study. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), R0 resection rate, and pathological complete response rate. Results: From October 2021 to February 2023, 38 patients were included in this study, and clinical data of 27 patients can be used to track and evaluate clinical efficacy. The median age of the subjects was 58.5 years (range 47-75 years). the primary study end point was an ORR of 77.8% (95% CI，61%-94.5%). Conclusions: We will strictly implement the research protocol and objectively evaluate the anti-tumor activity and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with tislelizumab, paclitaxel liposome and nedaplatin regimen in the treatment of patients with stage IIB ~ IVA esophageal cancer. In order to provide a safe and reliable neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100049693 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16082
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    NPAP1 mutation as an indicator stratified patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e14574-e14574
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e14574-e14574
    Abstract: e14574 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have demonstrated impressive anti-tumor efficacy in multiple tumors, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a minority of patients could clinically benefit from the ICIs. Therefore, it is of vital clinical significance to explore underlying predictive biomarkers to identify to identify these most potentially ICIs-benefitable patients. Nuclear pore associated protein 1 ( NPAP1) encodes an protein is associated with the nuclear pore complex and has been previously reported as a potential prognostic biomarker for laryngeal, colorectal and lung cancers. However, its role in lung cancer immunotherapy remains unknown. Here we aimed to explore the association between NPAP1 and ICIs. Methods: 165 NSCLC patients from three public immunotherapy cohorts (Hellmann 2018, Miao 2018, and Rizvi 2015 cohort) were included to analyze the association between NPAP1 gene mutation and efficacy of ICI therapy. Genomic, survival and mRNA data of NSCLC patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to explore the potential mechanisms of anti-tumor immunity. Results: NSCLC patients with NPAP1 mutation were significantly associated with better PFS (HR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; P = 0.002), objective response rate (ORR, 54.2% vs 28.4%; P = 0.048) and durable clinical benefit (DCB, 75.0% vs 42.6%; P= 0.003) after ICIs therapy, compared with those with wide-type NPAP1. NPAP1 mutation were associated with increased TMB ( P 〈 0.001). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted by smoking status, PD-L1 expression and TMB, the association between NPAP1 mutation and PFS remained significant (HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.92; P = 0.028). In contrast, no association between NPAP1 mutation and OS (LUAD: P = 0.24 ; LUSC: P = 0.94) or PFS (LUAD: P = 0.3; LUSC: P = 0.72) was observed in TCGA datasets, suggesting that NPAP1 mutation may be a predictive but not a prognostic factor in ICI treatment for NSCLC patients. Based on CIBERSORT-inferred tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from TCGA, NPAP1 mutation was significantly associated with higher activated memory CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell. Moreover, NPAP1 mutation was associated with increased TMB ( P 〈 0.001) and neoantigen load ( P 〈 0.001) in TCGA. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that NPAP1 mutation is an underlying classifier that could stratify patients with NSCLC for ICIs. The role of NPAP1 in immunotherapy is needed to be further studied.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e14574
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...