GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e21220-e21220
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e20560-e20560
    Abstract: e20560 Background: Available clinical research data shows that early mutation testing for patients with NSCLC stage IV could lead to an effective choice of therapy for patients with proven mutations. Targeted therapies achieve a higher ORR, PFS, OS and a better quality of life than chemotherapy in mt+ patients. With the advent of 2 nd and 3 rd generation TKI´s effective in 1 st generation TKI resistant tumors, we wanted to study the impact of these drugs on the outcome of patients in a real life setting in 3 lung cancer centers. Methods: 1383 patients from the three cancer centers diagnosed with NSCLC stage IV (UICC 7) were examined. Methods for the detection of mutations included Sanger Sequencing, hybridization based COBAS testing as well as hybrid cage next generation sequencing. Results: 880/1383 (64%) consecutive patients with non-squamous cell NSCLC from the cancer centers were studied for the presence of tumor mutations, especially for EGFR and ALK mutations. The EGFR mutation rate was 16.6% (141/880), and the ALK-translocation rate 3.8% (24/635). Median OS in EGFR mt+ patients was 31 (n = 78) vs. 32 (n = 38) vs. 16 (n = 14) months respectively (center 1 vs. center 2 vs. center 3). Median OS in ALK mt+ patients was 25 (n = 17) months in center 1 and 11 (n = 5) months in center 2 (p 〈 0.05). Use of 3 rd generation TKI Osimertinib (n = 17) lead to a significantly higher OS (n = 17, median OS 67 mo) than the use of only 1 st and 2 nd generation TKI (n = 113, median OS 24 mo, p 〈 0.000). Similarly, use of 2 nd and 3 rd generation ALKi impacted significantly on median OS: Crizotinib alone n = 7, 17 months, Crizotinib followed by Ceritinib and/or Brigatinib (n = 9) median OS not reached, p 〈 0.001. Conclusions: Smalldifferences in OS were observed, depending on the treatment centers, but the use of multiple EGFR and ALK-I impacted highly significantly on the outcome of patients with EGFR and ALK-alterations in a real life setting.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. TPS8601-TPS8601
    Abstract: TPS8601 Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a highly aggressive cancer of the pleura, predominantly caused by prior asbestos exposure. Currently, there is no approved standard therapy for the treatment of early-stage PM. In most cases a multimodal therapy is recommended consisting of locoregional treatment by surgical cytoreduction via extended pleurectomy/decortication (eP/D), which, if feasible, can be combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemoperfusion (HITOC), together with inductive or adjuvant chemotherapy. Considering the immunogenic effects of chemotherapy on the tumor microenvironment, synergistic effects are expected when such a treatment is combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In addition, interactions between immune infiltrates and mesothelioma cells play a role in the advent of PM, also implying a beneficial role for immunotherapy in this entity. This is also supported by recent clinical data that demonstrated beneficial effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced PM. The NICITA trial is an investigator-initiated trial, investigating the combination of adjuvant chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor compared to chemotherapy alone in radically resected patients with early stage PM. Methods: The NICITA trial is a randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial that is conducted in 14 centers across Germany. Eligible patients have been diagnosed with PM in tumor stages I-III (UICC 8 th edition) and epithelioid subtype, and must have undergone cytoreductive surgery by eP/D with or without HITOC. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a combination of 4 cycles of pemetrexed/platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy and nivolumab (480 mg q4w) followed by nivolumab maintenance therapy (12 cycles, 480 mg q4w) or 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy only. Stratification will take place according to previous HITOC treatment (yes vs. no), ECOG status (0,1 vs. 2), and achievement of macroscopic complete resection (yes vs. no). The primary endpoint of this trial is time-to-next-treatment. Secondary endpoints include additional measures of efficacy (progression-free survival, overall survival, measures of treatment-beyond-progression) and quality of life, as well as the assessment of safety. Furthermore, a comprehensive longitudinal collection of biomarker samples, including tumor tissue, blood, and stool samples, for an accompanying translational research project is implemented in this clinical trial. Sample size justification: the recruitment of 46 patients to each arm with a low drop-out rate of 13% appears feasible resulting in 40 patients to be analyzed per arm. This sample size will permit a descriptive comparison and adequately describe the tested treatment options as deduced from the precision of the median TNT confidence interval estimate. As of February 2 nd 2023, 85 of planned 92 patients have been enrolled into the NICITA trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04177953 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 9025-9025
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e21076-e21076
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e21076-e21076
    Abstract: e21076 Background: Results of IMpower-150 and Orient-31 have demonstrated a favorable effect of combining anti-angiogenic therapy and checkpoint inhibition for refractory NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. However, both studies included only very few patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, not allowing further analysis. For those patients, representing about 10% of EGFR mutant NSCLCs, treatment options are still limited. Methods: Analysis included 16 stage IV NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations from 9 different German centers which started treatment in first or further line with Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin and (nab-)Paclitaxel (ABCP) between October 2018 and January 2022. EGFR mutations were detected by NGS (n = 15) or COBAS-PCR (n = 1). PFS was evaluated from start of ABCP and OS from time of initial diagnosis of stage IV. Results: 5 men and 11 women received ABCP therapy in first (n = 4), second (n = 9) or further line (n = 3). Mean age was 56 (36-77) years. Patients had either an Exon 20 insertion (n = 9) or point mutation (n = 2, S768I), an Exon 18 mutation (n = 3, G719X or E709A), an Exon 21 mutation (L861Q) or a compound mutation (G719C/S768I). 9 patients received a TKI therapy in first line (4x Afatinib; 5x Osimertinib) with an ORR of 66.7% (CR = 1; PR = 5; SD = 1; PD = 2) and a median time-to-next-treatment of 6.7 months (range: 2.1-39.1 months). Median number of full ABCP cycles were 4 (1-6), with 3 patients (23.1%) requiring a dose reduction of chemotherapy and 4 patients (30.8%) suffering from grade 3 or 4 toxicity (one immune related pneumonitis). 13 patients (84.6%) received a maintenance with AB and the median follow-up after initial diagnosis was 19.6 months (2.3-38.4). ORR was 81.3% with 2 CR, 11 PR, 1 SD and 1 PD (not available = 1). Median PFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 13.0 months for both the entire cohort (95%-CI: 8.4-17.6) and for Exon 20 insertions (95%-CI: 9.3-16.7). Corresponding median OS was either not reached or 30.7 months (95%-CI: 13.8-47.6). Landmark analysis at 12 months gave a PFS of 42.8% and an OS of 93.3%. Univariate Cox regression showed no association of PFS or OS with patient or treatment parameters, including PD-L1 expression, type of mutation or prior TKI treatment. 4 patients were rechallenged with ABCP while progressing under AB maintenance and responded again. 4 patients received mobocertinib as further treatment, but only one showed a clinical benefit. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, ABCP achieves an encouraging outcome for patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, comparable to results for common EGFR mutations in IMpower150 (ORR 71%, mPFS: 9.7 months, mOS 29.4 months). This in contrast to immunotherapy alone which shows poor ORR and PFS. Together with new targeted treatment options for Exon 20 insertions like amivantamab (ORR 40%, mPFS 8.3 months) or mobocertinib (ORR 28%, mPFS 7.3 months), ABCP is a valuable option in the early course of treatment for this patient cohort.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...