GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (4)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 3_suppl ( 2014-01-20), p. 19-19
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 3_suppl ( 2014-01-20), p. 19-19
    Abstract: 19 Background: The evaluation of gene amplification and/or protein overexpression of HER2 in gastric cancer is a prerequisite to establish an adequate treatment strategy. Gastric tumors are heterogeneous and separate evaluations lead to uncertainties in localizing distinct clones and are time consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of gene-protein platform in comparison to single staining methods. Methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plus silver in situ hybridization (SISH) (IHC/SISH) and the new gene-protein platform (gene/protein) method for HER2 were performed in randomly collected 100 cases of gastric carcinoma. Evaluation was performed by two observers, in discrepant cases a third observer was consulted to make a decision by consensus. Results of IHC and SISH were compared with gene/protein staining. Rüschoff criteria were applied. Tumors showing HER2 expression 3+ or amplification were considered HER2 positive. Results: 96 of 100 samples were eligible. Amplification was observed in 14.6% by both, conventional SISH and gene/protein platform. 70.8% by IHC and gene/protein had no expression (0) and 10.4%/11.5% (IHC vs. gene/protein) had weak (1+) HER2 expression. Moderate expression (2+) was observed in 9.4% by IHC and 7.3% by gene/protein. Rate of overexpression (3+) was similar in IHC (9.4%) and gene/protein (10.4%). There were complete concordances (100%; κ=1) in IHC assessment of cases with score 0 and SISH amplified tumors. High concordance are shown in score 1+ (98.96%; κ=0.947) and 3+ (96.88%; κ=0.825) cases. Concordance in cases with score 2+ was found in 95.83% (κ=0.728) of the observations. After third observation, there were 5 discordant cases with most discrepancies in assessment of IHC score 2+ or 3+. Conclusions: Gene-protein platform has been tested for first time in gastric carcinoma. Results showed that this novel platform can be a feasible alternative to single methods. Discrepancies in cases with moderate HER2 expression are a result of observer variability.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 4618-4618
    Abstract: 4618 Background: APACT was a phase III trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine ( nab-P + Gem) vs Gem alone in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (PC) and the first adjuvant PC trial to use independently assessed DFS as the primary endpoint (DFS by investigator review was a prespecified sensitivity analysis). We examined concordance between independent and investigator DFS review. Methods: For the independent assessment, reviewers determined recurrence by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging but were blinded to treatment and clinical data. Investigator-assessed DFS was based on all available data. Concordance was summarized by κ statistics. Patients who did not have recurrence or were alive were censored at the last tumor assessment date with disease-free status or the randomization date if the last tumor assessment with disease-free status was missing. Patients who received new anticancer therapy or cancer-related surgery prior to recurrence or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment with disease-free status prior to the start of new anticancer therapy or cancer-related surgery or the randomization date if the last tumor assessment date with disease-free status prior to the start of subsequent new anticancer therapy or cancer-related surgery was missing. All censoring rules were the same for analysis of DFS by independent and investigator review. Results: Median DFS by independent review was 19.4 ( nab-P + Gem) vs 18.8 (Gem) months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 - 1.06; P = 0.18); median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 ( nab-P + Gem) vs 13.7 (Gem) months (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 - 0.97; nominal P = 0.017). Moderate concordance was found between independent- and investigator-assessed DFS (Table); similar results were observed in the nab-P + Gem (concordance, 78%; κ coefficient, 0.56) and Gem alone (concordance, 76%; κ coefficient, 0.53) arms. Conclusions: The results reflect the complexities of defining the recurrence timepoint accurately and suggest that radiological review in the absence of clinical context is suboptimal for recurrence detection in resected PC. These findings may inform future clinical trial design. Registration: EudraCT (2013-003398-91); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01964430). Clinical trial information: NCT01964430 . [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 4100-4100
    Abstract: 4100 Background: Amplification and/or protein overexpression of HER2 in gastric cancer is a prerequisite to establish an adequate treatment strategy. The European standard defined HER2 positivity by IHC as first evaluation assay followed by ISH in 2+ cases. Gastric tumors are heterogeneous and separate evaluations lead to uncertainties and in localizing distinct clones and are time consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of gene-protein platform in comparison to single staining methods. Methods: IHC plus SISH and gene-protein platform (IHC/SISH, protein/gene) method for HER2 were performed in randomly collected 100 cases of gastric carcinoma. Results of IHC and SISH were compared with IHC/SISH staining. Rüschoff criteria were applied. Tumors were HER2 positive when expression 3+ or 2+ plus gene amplification (EU-Norm) was found. In Second definition (US-Norm), tumors showing HER2 expression 3+ or amplification were considered HER2 positive. Results: 96 of 100 samples were eligible. Amplification was observed in 14.6% and 15.6% by SISH and IHC/SISH. 71.9% by IHC vs. 75.0% by IHC/SISH had no expression (0) and 10.4% (IHC vs. IHC/SISH) had weak (1+) HER2 expression. Moderate expression (2+) and overexpression (3+) were observed in IHC 6.3%/11.5% and IHC/SISH 6.3%/8.3%, respectively. There were high concordances in IHC assessment of cases with score 0 (94.8%; κ=0.87) and 3+ (96.9%; κ=0.83) and moderate concordances in 1+/2+ cases (89.6%; κ= 0.44 vs. 93.8%; κ=0.47). Rate of HER2 positivity was similar in standard or novel method. In EU Definition 14.6% vs. 10.4% (p=0.52) were positive, respectively, with very good concordance (95.8%; κ=0.81).Concordance between HER2 positivity in standard or novel method was very good (99.0%; κ=0.96) in US definition with no significant differences (17.7% vs. 16.7%; p=1). Conclusions: Gene-protein platform has been tested for first time in gastric carcinoma. Results showed that this novel platform can be a feasible alternative to single methods. Discrepancies in cases with weak or moderate HER2 expression can be a result of observer variability.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 2056-2056
    Abstract: 2056 Background: Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We report our clinical trial evaluating safety and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and TTFields. Methods: This is a single arm pilot study. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a KPS of ≥ 60 were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily) and TTFields (200 kHz). Maintenance therapy included temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of TTFields concurrent with chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the trial. Twenty were male and ten were female, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 77 years). Median KPS was 90 (range 70 to 100). Median follow-up was 8.9 months (range 1.6 to 21.4 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had methylated promoter status. Median time from surgery to radiation was 34 days (26 to 49 days). Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients, with the mean dose having a median value of 8.3 Gy (range 4.3 to 14.8 Gy), the D20cc median was 26.1 Gy (range 17.7 to 42.8 Gy), and the D30cc median was 23.5 Gy (range 14.8 to 35.4 Gy). Skin adverse events (AEs; erythema, dermatitis, irritation, folliculitis) were noted in 83.3% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events, which resolved spontaneously or with topical medications. No patient had radiation treatment interruption due to skin AEs. Other Grade 1 events included pruritus (33.3%), fatigue (30%), nausea (13.3%), headache (10%), dizziness (6.7%), and cognitive impairment (3.3%). Other Grade 2 events included headache (3.3%). Nineteen patients (63.3%) had progression, with a median PFS of 7.6 months (range 1.6 to 12.7 months). Overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: Concurrent TTFields (200 kHz) with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trials are warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation. Clinical trial information: NCT03477110.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...