GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 3520-3520
    Abstract: 3520 Background: The preliminary results of the OPRA trial demonstrated that a substantial number of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) could achieve organ preservation. Although most tumor regrowths seem to occur within the first 3 years, longer follow-up is needed to assess the ongoing risk of regrowth. Here, we report the long-term organ preservation rate and oncologic outcomes of the OPRA trial. Methods: A prospective, multi-institutional phase II trial, in which patients with stage II or III rectal cancer were randomized to receive either induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (INCT-CRT) or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Patients underwent reassessment for treatment response 8-12 weeks after TNT. Patients who achieved a complete or near-complete response after finishing TNT were offered a watch and wait approach (WW). Those with incomplete response were recommended total mesorectal excision (TME). We report 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), organ preservation (defined as TME-free survival), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) for each treatment group. We also compared DFS between patients who underwent upfront TME after restaging and patients who underwent TME after tumor regrowth. All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle and groups were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 324 patients randomized, 158 were assigned to the INCT-CRT group and 166 to the CRT-CNCT group. Median follow-up was 56 months; 85 DFS events were observed. The rates of 3- and 5-year DFS, TME-free survival, LRFS, DMFS and OS are listed in the Table. In total, 80 of the 225 (36%) patients who started WW developed a regrowth; 94% occurred within 2 years and 99% occurred within 3 years. The rate of TME-free survival at 5 years was significantly higher for CRT-CNCT (54%) than in INCT-CRT (39%). 5-year DFS was similar for patients who underwent TME after restaging (61%) compared to patients who underwent TME after regrowth (62%, p = 0.86). Conclusions: In patients with rectal cancer treated with TNT and WW, the majority of tumor regrowths occur in the first 2 years, and regrowth after 3 years is vanishingly rare. Salvage TME for tumor regrowth during WW appears to offer similar outcome to immediate TME after incomplete response to TNT. Distant metastases remain the most frequent cause of treatment failure, with similar rates in the two treatment groups. Clinical trial information: NCT02008656 . [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 3619-3619
    Abstract: 3619 Background: Baseline rectal MRI is routinely used for tumor staging, selecting the initial treatment and prognostication of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. However, associations of baseline clinical and MRI variables with organ preservation (OP) in a prospective randomized trial have not been reported. Methods: Patients with MRI staged clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma treated in a prospective phase II clinical trial were randomized to either induction chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPEOX) followed by chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPEOX) and recommended total mesorectal excision (TME) or watch-and-wait (WW) based on clinical response. The primary outcome was OP, defined as the time from randomization to the clinical decision of TME or last follow-up, whichever occurred first. Clinical variables included: age, sex, race, tumor grade, radiation dose and treatment arm. Radiological variables (evaluated by baseline MRI prior to randomization) included: distance from the anal verge, tumor length, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, relationship to the mesorectal fascia, presence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and mucinous radiographic findings ( 〉 50%). Associations of OP with clinical and radiological variables were assessed utilizing the Cox regression model in univariate and multivariate settings. The final multivariate model was chosen using backward selection. Results were analyzed by intention to treat. Results: Case report forms (CRFs) from baseline MRI were available for 289 of 324 randomized patients (89%). Patients with CRFs differed from those without CRFs in race, distance of the tumor from the anal verge and clinical T stage. Median follow-up was 3.4 years. A total of 156 of 324 patients were recommended TME during the study period. The 3-year OP rate was 47%. Independent predictors of OP in the multivariate analysis can be seen in the table. Conclusions: Although the patients included in this analysis may not be fully representative of the entire cohort, our data shows that several radiological variables associated with unfavorable tumor biology – tumor involvement of the mesorectal fascia, presence of EMVI and involved mesorectal nodes – were negatively associated with organ preservation. This information will be useful in selecting rectal cancer patients for WW and should be used for patient stratification in future clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02008656. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...