GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e18594-e18594
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e18594-e18594
    Abstract: e18594 Background: Malignancy is thought to be an independent risk factor for increased COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. However, neoplastic diseases encompass a heterogenous group of pathologic processes, and further stratification of those patients prone to severe disease is necessary. We sought to identify predictors of poor COVID-19 outcomes among hospitalized patients with malignancy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of hematologic and solid tumor malignancy within the regional Scripps Health hospital system in San Diego County from March 1, 2020 to January 5, 2021 with a PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Cancer diagnoses were confirmed via manual chart review; in situ non-melanoma skin cancers were excluded. Only hospitalizations greater than one day were included in the analysis and readmissions were excluded. Outcomes of interest included admission to the ICU, intubation during hospitalization, and death. Associations between outcomes of interest and tumor types, metastatic disease (with or without lung involvement) and those receiving active systemic anticancer therapy (treatment within 3 months of admission) were determined using univariable logistic regression analyses. The study was approved by the Scripps Health Institutional Review Board. Systemic anticancer therapy included cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunomodulators, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and other targeted therapies. Results: Among a total of 2,771 hospitalized patients, 204 (7.36%) met inclusion criteria. The average age was 72.7 years, 48.5% were male, 33.3% were Hispanic and the average BMI was 27.5. The majority of patients (82.8%) had solid tumors, with the most prevalent being breast carcinoma (17.6%) and prostate carcinoma (17.2%). Overall, 21.9% had metastatic disease and 16% had lung involvement. 17.2% had been receiving active cancer systemic treatment. On univariate analysis, patients who were actively receiving treatment had an increased rate of death (37.1% vs 18.9%, OR: 2.5 (1.1-5.5) p= .021). Among patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy, 48.6% received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 5.7% immune checkpoint inhibitors, 22.9% immunomodulators, 17.1% molecularly targeted agents and 2.7% other agents. Moreover, there was a trend towards increased mortality in those with lung involvement (33.3% vs 17.6%, OR: 2.3 (0.9-5.7) p= .067) and those with hematologic malignancy (31.4% vs 20.1%, OR: 0.5 (0.2-1.3) p = 0.146). Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of cancer, systemic anticancer therapy was associated with a significantly increased odds of death. Other factors potentially increasing risk of death include hematologic malignancy and solid tumors with lung involvement. Further validation of these findings in a larger sample could impact therapeutic decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e16257-e16257
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e16257-e16257
    Abstract: e16257 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease often diagnosed with synchronous metastatic disease involving the liver. Tumors with extra-abdominal spread that bypass the liver are thought to represent a unique molecular subgroup of the disease. Specifically, those with isolated pulmonary metastatic disease are thought to have a more favorable clinical phenotype. We sought to retrospectively investigate whether patients with isolated pulmonary metastases had improved survival compared to those with disease involving the liver. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC treated between the years 2010 and 2020 at a Scripps Health hospital. The final study sample included only patients with pulmonary and/or liver primary metastases (N = 175). Analyses were conducted on subgroups defined by metastatic sites of disease in the liver only, lung only and combined liver+lung. Primary and secondary outcome analyses compared isolated lung versus liver/liver+lung. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), defined as from the date of diagnosis to date of death or most recent follow up. Progression free survival (PFS) was also analyzed as a secondary endpoint and defined as from the date of diagnosis to date of radiographic progression. Each survival outcome was analyzed using Cox Proportional Hazards tests. Results: No statistically significant differences were seen in OS (HR 0.67, CI 0.44–1.03; p= 0.069) or PFS (HR 1.05, CI 0.68–1.65; p= 0.816) between patients with primary lung metastases compared to those with either liver or liver+lung metastases (reported as hazard ratios of liver/liver+lung relative to lung only). However, a trend towards improved OS was seen for patients with isolated lung metastasis and the kaplan-meier curve for OS showed improved survival for these patients at 3 years, with crossing of the survival curves around 5 years from time of diagnosis. Conclusions: There appears to be a unique clinical phenotype in patients with PDAC presenting with isolated pulmonary disease. Though there was not a statistically significant difference in OS and PFS seen in our population, there was a trend towards improved overall survival compared to those with hepatic involvement. These findings highlight a potential prognostic indicator of metastatic PDAC and further subgroup analysis will help characterize clinical variations that may lead to these differences in tumor biology.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16237-e16237
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16237-e16237
    Abstract: e16237 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma most commonly metastasizes to the liver and peritoneum, yet can occasionally metastasize to the lungs in an isolated fashion. Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients who have isolated metastatic disease to the lungs have improved outcomes. We sought to investigate whether pancreatic cancer lung metastasis is associated with improved survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients within the Scripps Health system with pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2017 to 2020. Primary sites of metastatic disease were identified with imaging, and when available, confirmed by pathology. A subgroup of 101 patients from a total cohort of 598 patients was further refined to only include patients with lung and/or liver primary metastases (N=68). Analyses were conducted on subgroups defined by metastatic sites of disease in the liver only, lung only and combined liver+lung. Primary and secondary outcome analyses compared isolated lung versus liver/liver+lung. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of diagnosis to date of death or most recent follow up, and recurrence free survival (RFS) from the time of diagnosis to date of recurrence. Each survival outcome was analyzed using Cox Proportional Hazards tests. Additionally, proportions of each subgroup (lung v. liver/liver+lung) that had recurrence or were deceased were reported and compared by Fisher’s exact tests. Results: No significant differences were observed in OS (HR 1.91, CI 0.66 – 3.73; p= 0.311) or RFS (HR 0.98, CI 0.42 – 2.30; p= 0.968) between patients with primary lung metastases versus those with either liver or liver+lung metastases (reported as hazard ratios of liver/liver+lung relative to lung only). Although there was no overall statistically significant difference, the kaplan-meier curve for OS appears to show improved survival for patients with primary lung metastasis initially but then ultimately shows worse survival compared to liver only metastasis at later time points. Please see Table.Conclusions: We found no difference in survival outcomes among pancreatic cancer patients with only lung metastasis at diagnosis compared to patients with hepatic metastasis. However, we do observe that patients with lung metastases seem to have improved survival initially. This study was conducted on a small set of the total number of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma within the Scripps Health system. Further analysis is ongoing to confirm the trend we observe in this study.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...