GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (1)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (1)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e17574-e17574
    Abstract: e17574 Background: There is active debate concerning the ethics and risks of non-clinically indicated biopsies (bxs) in patients (pts) with cancer. In this analysis we examined our single institution experience regarding acceptance, safety, and success rate with research biopsies in pts with breast cancer (BC). Methods: An IRB-approved ongoing prospective study at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute collects research bxs from pts with BC. Research bxs are performed as additional passes at the time of a clinical bx (cohort 1) or as a separate procedure for banking purposes only (cohort 2) on known tumor or suspicious lesions. Bxs are not linked to a specific therapeutic or correlative trial. Bx-site related risks are pre-specified in consent forms. Grade 2-5 adverse events (AEs) associated with the procedure are prospectively collected. Chart review for bxs between 2005-2013 was performed in this analysis. Results: As of January 2013, 158 pts had consented to the study; 3 pts withdrew consent and 4 pts did not have bxs. 151 pts are in the analytic cohort (total bxs performed= 161); 82% in cohort 1, 18% in cohort 2. Most pts were white (89%) with a performance status of 0-1 (98%). A majority of pts (96%) underwent a bx in the setting of known or suspected metastatic disease. 39% of bxs were performed at time of diagnosis or first recurrence. The most common sites for bx were liver (38%, n=61), skin (24%, n=39) and breast (18%, n=29). Lung was uncommon (3%, n=4). Research biopsies were successfully performed in 114 (92%) pts in cohort 1 and 27 (100%) pts in cohort 2. In cohort 1, research biopsies were not successful in 10 pts. In 9 pts the clinical samples had insufficient material, leading to the forfeit of the banked research sample for clinical purposes; in 1 pt the bx was suspended for severe pain. Only 3 (1.9%) pts had AEs ≥ grade 2: 1 with grade 2 pain; 1 with grade 2 pneumothorax; and 1 with grade 3 pain. Conclusions: Our experience in an academic medical center suggests that pts with BC are willing to undergo research bxs outside the context of a therapeutic or translational trial. These procedures can be performed safely with a high rate of successful tissue collection. Additional data are needed to fully quantify the risks and to demonstrate the value of these procedures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...