GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (4)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. TPS207-TPS207
    Abstract: TPS207 Background: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common skin toxicity associated with regorafenib that may lead to drug withdrawal, dose reduction, or drug interruption. Predicting or recognizing early symptoms of HFSR could allow for better care. Digital solutions for ambulatory monitoring of patients provide an opportunity for monitoring and early detection of HFSR in home conditions. Methods: FACET is a phase 4, prospective, open-label, multicenter, interventional trial designed to assess the clinical utility, technical feasibility and usability of a system including a camera, FeetMe Connected insoles for gait assessment, ePRO questionnaires (HFS-14, EQ-5D-5L, FAS and VAS), and educational materials to detect and grade the severity of HFSR. During the study, enrolled patients developing an HFSR will be assigned to the HFSR group and patients without any sign of HFSR, they will be assigned to non-HFSR group. Study registration number at ANSM (French Authority): ID-RCB 2020-A03080-39. Patients will have metastatic colorectal cancer requiring initiation of regorafenib in accordance with clinical practice standard. Other key inclusion criteria are ECOG Performance Status 0-2, ability to understand the instructions and complete the ePRO questionnaires, ability to understand and communicate in French language, familiarity in using mobile communication devices and mobile application software, no previous episode of HFSR or HFS. The primary objective is to explore fit-for-purpose, and usability of the ePRO instruments and the data collecting devices. The primary endpoint is participants’ compliance with data collection measured by ePRO questionnaires completion, use of camera to take images vs expected and number of device days of insoles usage vs expected. Secondary objectives are to characterize variables exhibiting significant associations with development of HFSR. Secondary endpoints include summary statistics of ePRO questionnaires scores at the HFSR worst grade event in the HFSR group vs at 3 weeks in the non-HFSR group; Summary statistics for Feetme Connected insoles variables; Regorafenib dose modifications and treatment discontinuation; Participant’s device daily use to generate data; Participants ability to reach a hotline for technical issues or usability complaints. For HFSR related secondary endpoints, a blinded and independent Preliminary Adjudication Committee (PAC) will retrospectively assign participants to two groups (HFSR vs. no-HFSR) based on a case-by-case blinded assessment. An independent Final Adjudication Committee will compare the PAC assessment and investigators’ assessments done on site. It is planned to include a total of 38 participants from 4 centers. As of September 2021, all sites are open and ready to enroll. Study funded by Bayer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18885-e18885
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18885-e18885
    Abstract: e18885 Background: Although anti-cancer treatments, including chemotherapy (CTs), targeted therapies (TTs), radiation therapy, and immunotherapy (ITs), are effective to treat cancer, they can be associated with significant skin-related toxicities (AEs). These AEs can cause discomfort and even lead to the discontinuation of therapies. However, a comprehensive estimation of the associations between cancer drug use and skin AEs is currently lacking. This study aimed to investigate these associations using a large dataset. Methods: This study utilized the US FDA Adverse Reporting System (FAERS) dataset, with a focus on HCPs reports from January 2013 to September 2022. The dataset consists of 3399830 reports involving 3084 all-field drugs and 16347 AEs. To minimize false positives, we employed a nearest-neighbor matching model to identify 10 control reports for each case report based on cosine distance on demographic and severity factors. To manage multiple comparisons and control the family-wise error rate (FWER) to 5%, we applied the Bonferroni correction. Results: A total of 146 marketed anti-cancer drugs were identified in the database with at least 5 reports of skin AEs. Out of the 2757 drug-AE pairs, 708 displayed a significant reporting odds ratio (ROR) greater than one, consisting of 102 drugs and 135 skin AEs. The minimum ROR was 1.25, and 50% of the associations displayed a ROR above 11. Rash was significantly associated with 44 drugs and dry skin with 25 drugs. Methotrexate was significantly associated with 35 different AEs and anti-BRAF vemurafenib with 26 AEs. TCs were present in 57% of the pairs, CTS in 38%, and immune checkpoint blocking agents in 5%. Multikinase-I were present in 15% of the pairs, followed by antimetabolites (14%). Considering the relative weight of skin AEs on the safety profile of the drugs, skin AE were present on average in 11% of the drug reports, with a maximum of 51% for mechlorethamine. 12% of reports concerning CTs contained a skin AE, 11% for TTs, and 8% for ITs. For CTs, 13% of reports about antimetabolites contained a skin AE, followed by taxanes (12%). Vinca-alkaloids and topoisomerase-I were less impacted with 6% of skin AE reports. For TCs, 23% of reports about EGFR inhibitors contained a skin AE, followed by BRAF inhibitors (21%). PARP inhibitors and BTK inhibitors were less impacted with 8% of skin AE reports. Conclusions: This study used a large dataset to examine the associations between cancer drugs and skin AEs. 146 anti-cancer drugs were found to have skin AEs, with rash and dry skin being the most reported AEs in the associations. TTs were most associated with skin AEs, followed by CTs. Methotrexate and vemurafenib had the most important number of associations. These data don’t allow evaluation of the incidence of skin AE effect with anti-cancer drugs as they are probably under-reported, but the findings emphasize the importance of monitoring skin AEs in patients exposed to anti-cancer treatments.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 27, No. 23 ( 2009-08-10), p. e59-e61
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 33, No. 15_suppl ( 2015-05-20), p. e12655-e12655
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 15_suppl ( 2015-05-20), p. e12655-e12655
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...