GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (12)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 4075-4075
    Abstract: 4075 Background: In the ePHAS study we analyzed three eNOSpolymorphisms and at univariate analysis, patients with eNOS-786 -TTgenotype had significantly shorter median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) compared to those with other genotypes. On the basis of these preliminary results, our aim is to validate in a prospective study this data in patients with HCC treated with sorafenib. Methods: This is a prospective Italian multicenter study, that includes 141 HCC patients receiving sorafenib. We analyzed eNOS-786and itwas analyzed by Real Time PCR in relation to the primary end point (OS). Event-time distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Results: 141 HCC patients (122 males and 19 females), prospectively treated with sorafenib from May 2015 to September 2018 were included. Median age was 69 years (range 28-88 years). 120 patients had Child-Pugh A and 21 had Child-Pugh B7. 43 had BCLC-B and 98 patients had BCLC-C. Atunivariate analysis, we confirmed that eNOS-786 TT genotype were significantly associated with a lower median OS than the other genotypes (8.8 vs 15.7 months, HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.83 p=0.0424). Following adjustment for clinical covariates (age, gender, etiology, BCLC stage, serum α-FP level, MELD score), multivariate analysis confirmed eNOS- 786 and BCLC stage as the independentsprognostic factors predicting OS (TTvsTC+CC; HR: 2.39, 95% CI 1.14-5.03 p=0.0211; C vs B;2.23, 95% CI 1.44-4.77 p=0.039). Conclusions: Our prospective study confirms the prognostic role of eNOS-786 in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Clinical trial information: NCT02786342.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: JCO Precision Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), , No. 4 ( 2020-11), p. 1339-1349
    Abstract: A large proportion of patients with cancer suffer from breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). Several unmet clinical needs concerning BTcP treatment, such as optimal opioid dosages, are being investigated. In this analysis the hypothesis, we explore with an unsupervised learning algorithm whether distinct subtypes of BTcP exist and whether they can provide new insights into clinical practice. METHODS Partitioning around a k-medoids algorithm on a large data set of patients with BTcP, previously collected by the Italian Oncologic Pain Survey group, was used to identify possible subgroups of BTcP. Resulting clusters were analyzed in terms of BTcP therapy satisfaction, clinical features, and use of basal pain and rapid-onset opioids. Opioid dosages were converted to a unique scale and the BTcP opioids-to-basal pain opioids ratio was calculated for each patient. We used polynomial logistic regression to catch nonlinear relationships between therapy satisfaction and opioid use. RESULTS Our algorithm identified 12 distinct BTcP clusters. Optimal BTcP opioids-to-basal pain opioids ratios differed across the clusters, ranging from 15% to 50%. The majority of clusters were linked to a peculiar association of certain drugs with therapy satisfaction or dissatisfaction. A free online tool was created for new patients’ cluster computation to validate these clusters in future studies and provide handy indications for personalized BTcP therapy. CONCLUSION This work proposes a classification for BTcP and identifies subgroups of patients with unique efficacy of different pain medications. This work supports the theory that the optimal dose of BTcP opioids depends on the dose of basal opioids and identifies novel values that are possibly useful for future trials. These results will allow us to target BTcP therapy on the basis of patient characteristics and to define a precision medicine strategy also for supportive care.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2473-4284
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 5 ( 2016-02-10), p. 436-442
    Abstract: The WHO guidelines on cancer pain management recommend a sequential three-step analgesic ladder. However, conclusive data are lacking as to whether moderate pain should be treated with either step II weak opioids or low-dose step III strong opioids. Patients and Methods In a multicenter, 28-day, open-label randomized controlled study, adults with moderate cancer pain were assigned to receive either a weak opioid or low-dose morphine. The primary outcome was the number of responder patients, defined as patients with a 20% reduction in pain intensity on the numerical rating scale. Results A total of 240 patients with cancer (118 in the low-dose morphine and 122 in the weak-opioid group) were included in the study. The primary outcome occurred in 88.2% of the low-dose morphine and in 57.7% of the weak-opioid group (odds risk, 6.18; 95% CI, 3.12 to 12.24; P 〈 .001). The percentage of responder patients was higher in the low-dose morphine group, as early as at 1 week. Clinically meaningful (≥ 30%) and highly meaningful (≥ 50%) pain reduction from baseline was significantly higher in the low-dose morphine group (P 〈 .001). A change in the assigned treatment occurred more frequently in the weak-opioid group, because of inadequate analgesia. The general condition of patients, which was based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System overall symptom score, was better in the morphine group. Adverse effects were similar in both groups. Conclusion In patients with cancer and moderate pain, low-dose morphine reduced pain intensity significantly compared with weak opioids, with a similarly good tolerability and an earlier effect.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e15684-e15684
    Abstract: e15684 Background: In 2015 we published a paper where we have assessed the outcome of patient with HCC treated with metformin(M)and sorafenib(S). The data show that the concomitant use of S and m was associated with a lower PFS and OS respect for patients receiving S alone. The aim of this study was to validate the prognostic significance of m in patients with HCC treated with S. Methods: 280 patients with HCC consecutively treated with S twice daily between March 2008 and August 2016 were included in the study. Patients who had been taking insulin (I) for at least 5 years at the time of the HCC diagnosis were considered “ patients with diabetes treated with I,” whereas those who had been on m at for at least 5 years when HCC was diagnosed were considered “ patients with diabetes treated with M.” Results: In patients treated chronically with m the treatment with S was associated with a median PFS of 1.9 months (95% CI 1.8-2.3) compared to 3.7 months (95% CI 3.1-4.6) for patients without DM2 and compared to 8.4 months (95% CI 5.3-11.4) for patients treatment chronically with I (P 〈 0.0001). In patients treated chronically with m the treatment with sorafenib was associated with a median OS of 6.6 months (95% CI 4.6-8.7) compared to 10.8 months (95% CI 9.0-13.1) for patients without DM2 and compared to 16.6 months (95% CI 14.5-25.5) for patients treatment chronically with I (P = 0.0001). Metformin effects on clinical outcome were also investigated in relation to ORR. Patients treated chronically with metformin showed a higher percentage of progression at the first CT re-evaluation than those patients treatment with I and patients without DM2 (75.8% vs. 14.7% vs 38,8%, respectively). Considering the overall population, the risk of progression, was higher in DM2 patients taking m compared with patients without DM2 (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.28-2.8,). Regarding the risk of survival, similar results were observed (HR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.14-2.55). Conclusions: These results confirm an increased tumor aggressiveness and resistance to S in patients treated with m cronicaly.Molecular alterations in transporter genes or transcription factors involved in m molecular action and pharmacokinetics could contribute to a different response to these drugs combination.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 23, No. 10 ( 2005-04-01), p. 2339-2345
    Abstract: A high interleukin-1β (IL-1B) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-RN) ratio underlies an unfavorable proinflammatory status. Also, it seems to be involved in the mechanisms of cancer cachexia and tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms in IL-1B gene (IL-1B-511C/T,IL-1B-31T/C) and a variable number of tandem repeat polymorphisms in IL-RN gene (IL-1RNlong/2) enhance the circulating levels of the two cytokines. The prognostic role of IL-1B/IL-1RN genotypes was investigated in patients with relapsed and metastatic gastric cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Before starting palliative chemotherapy, 123 prospectively enrolled patients supplied peripheral-blood samples for DNA extraction. Survival data were analyzed according to IL-1RN/IL-1B genotypes. Results Forty-two patients showed wild-type genotypes (IL-1RNlong/long, IL-1B-511C/C, and IL-1B-31T/T; group A). Forty-five patients showed the IL-1RN2 polymorphism, with wild-type IL-1B genotypes in seven patients and with IL-1B-511C/T and/or IL-1B-31T/C polymorphisms in 38 patients (group B). The remaining 36 patients demonstrated wild-type IL-1RN, with IL-1B-511C/T and/or IL-1B-31T/C polymorphisms (group C). In group A and B patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 and 26 weeks, respectively, and median overall survival (OS) was 42 and 43 weeks, respectively. Group C patients showed worse PFS (median, 16 weeks) and OS (median, 28 weeks) than group A (P = .006 for PFS; P = .0001 for OS) and group B patients (P = .01 for PFS; P = .0001 for OS). The long/T/C haplotype was overrepresented in patients with shortened PFS (P = .001) and OS (P = .0005). Conclusion In patients with advanced gastric cancer, IL-1B polymorphisms showed adverse prognostic influence when coupled with wild-type IL-1RN genotype. These findings deserve further investigation for potential anticancer activity of recombinant IL-RN.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 33, No. 3_suppl ( 2015-01-20), p. 313-313
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 3_suppl ( 2015-01-20), p. 313-313
    Abstract: 313 Background: Previous data suggested that LDH serum levels may be associated with tumour hypoxia and VEGFA and VEGFR-1 over-expression. LDH may then represent an indirect marker of activated tumour neo-angiogenesis and worse prognosis in many tumour types. In our analysis, we analyzed the role of LDH serum levels in predicting clinical outcome for biliary tract cancer patients treated with first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy, to individuate a potentially reliable and easy to use marker for patients stratification. Methods: 71 advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine in first-line chemotherapy were available for our analysis. For all patients, LDH values were collected within one month before treatment beginning. We chose the laboratory cut-off (Upper Normal Rate, UNR) as LDH cut-off value (450 U/l) and then we divided the patients into two groups (A and B, below and above the UNR respectively). Survival distribution was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed with chi-square test. A significant level of 0.05 was chosen to assess the statistical significance. Results: Patients in group A (46 patients) and B (25 patients) proved homogeneous for all clinical characteristics analyzed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.97 months and 1.8 months respectively in group A (patients with LDH level below the UNR) and in group B (patients with LDH level above the UNR), p=0.0064 (HR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.07-3.99). Median overall survival (OS) was 9.24 months and 2.55 months in group A and B respectively, p 〈 0.0001 (HR=2.93; 95%CI: 1.37-6.27). DCR was 65% in group A vs. 21% in group B (p=0.004). Conclusions: Our observations seem to suggest a prognostic role of LDH in biliary tract cancer patients. Our findings showing an improved PFS and DCR in patients with low LDH serum levels also suggest a possible predictive role in patients treated with a cisplatin and gemcitabine regimen as first-line chemotherapy. After further confirmation in larger trial, these results may be relevant for a better patients stratification and selection.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 129-129
    Abstract: 129 Background: Rechallenge therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is an emerging therapeutic approach. Trifluridine-tipiracil is approved for treatment of chemo-refractory mCRC patients. Methods: Chemo-refractory RAS WT mCRC patients, that had a major response (partial or complete response) to first-line chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody and had an-anti-EGFR drug-free interval during second-line therapy of four or more months were randomized in a phase II trial to assess the addition of the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab to trifluridine-tipiracil as third-line rechallenge therapy. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Baseline plasma was analyzed for circulating free tumor (ct) DNA by using Biocartis Idylla platform to detect mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF ( V600E) and EGFRextracellular domain ( S492R). In 24 patients with baseline RAS/BRAF wild type (WT) ctDNA, Foundation One liquid CDx (324 gene profiling) was also performed before treatment and at disease progression. Results: 62 patients were treated with trifluridine-tipiracil (31 patients, arm A) or with trifluridine-tipiracil plus panitumumab (31 patients, arm B). As of September 16, 2022, 1 patient in arm A and 2 patients in arm B were on treatment. The primary endpoint was met. Median PFS (mPFS) was 4 months in arm B versus 2.5 months in arm A [hazard ratio (HR): 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.82; P = 0.007]. Baseline plasma RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA was found in 23/31 patients in Arm A and in 26/31 patients in Arm B. In this group, mPFS was 4.5 months in Arm B versus 2.6 months in Arm A (HR: 0.48; 95% CI 0.26-0.89; P = 0.019). Disease control (major responses plus stable disease) was higher for patients in Arm B compared to Arm A (81% versus 48%), whereas disease progression was the best response in 19% versus 52% patients, respectively. PFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 38.5% and 15.4% in arm B versus 13% and 0% in arm A. At disease progression, Foundation One liquid CDx detected several mutations within the EGFR pathway, which could correlate with cancer cell resistance to panitumumab. Conclusions: This is the first prospective randomized trial which evaluated anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (panitumumab) in addition to standard of care (trifluridine-tipiracil) as third-line rechallenge therapy in chemo-refractory RASWT mCRC patients. Baseline liquid biopsy allows selection of RAS/BRAF WT ctDNA patients who could have a relevant clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT05468892 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 3540-3540
    Abstract: 3540 Background: Retrospective analyses and phase 2 studies suggest that administering an anti-EGFR in advanced lines may be effective in mCRC pts who achieved benefit from a 1 st -line anti-EGFR containing regimen. The identification of clinical features associated with benefit from anti-EGFR re-treatment (re-tx) in pts experiencing PD during 1 st -line anti-EGFR (rechallenge) or after its interruption (reintroduction), is a major clinical need. Methods: A real-life data-base including a total of 5530 pts treated at 6 insitutions from December 2010 to October 2018 was queried. Pts retreated with anti-EGFRs, with RAS/ BRAF wild-type status on tissue samples, who had received a 1 st -line anti-EGFR-based tx with at least SD as best response, and at least one further line of therapy before anti-EGFR re-tx, were included. The association with RECIST response (RR), PFS and OS was investigated for the following variables: RR (PR or CR vs SD) and PFS during 1 st -line; time from the last anti-EGFR administration to 1 st -line PD (i.e. re-introduction vs rechallenge); reason for anti-EGFR discontinuation in 1 st -line (PD vs. other); number of anti-EGFR-free lines of therapy before re-tx; anti-EGFR free interval (time between the last anti-EGFR administration in 1 st -line and the time of re-tx); primary tumor side; time from the diagnosis of metastatic disease to re-tx (≥ vs. 〈 18 mos). Results: Data from 86 patients were retrieved, 56 (65%) and 30 (35%) received anti-EGFR rechallenge or reintroduction, respectively. Median anti-EGFR free interval was 15.1 mos. The RR during re-tx was 19.8%, with a DCR of 46.5%. Median PFS and OS were 3.6 and 10.2 mos, respectively. No significant association of investigated features with RR and PFS was observed. No differences in RR or PFS were observed among patients receiving anti-EGFR re-tx as rechallenge or reintroduction (20.4% vs 23.1%, p = 0.99; median PFS: 3.49 vs 4.97 mos, p = 0.61). Patients with left-sided tumors had longer OS (HR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.26-0.93, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Clinical factors that are generally believed to affect the efficacy of anti-EGFR re-tx are not confirmed in our series. Therefore, clinicians should not rely on those characteristics in their decision-making on anti-EGFR re-tx, and adequate studies for implementing liquid biopsy in clinical practice are urgently needed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 15_suppl ( 2015-05-20), p. e15126-e15126
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 3575-3575
    Abstract: 3575 Background: The modified schedule of FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI) in combination with an anti-EGFR agent showed a manageable safety profile and remarkable activity in RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The association of an active cytotoxic regimen with cetuximab (cet) may increase the exposure of tumour-associated neoantigens and induce immunogenic cell death and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity thus enabling the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The AVETRIC study aimed at exploring the efficacy and safety of first-line mFOLFOXIRI plus cet and avelumab (ave) in RAS wt mCRC patients (pts). Methods: AVETRIC is a prospective, open label, multicenter, phase II, single arm trial in which initially unresectable and previously untreated RAS wt mCRC pts received mFOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/sqm, oxaliplatin 85 mg/sqm, folinate 200 mg/sqm leucovorin [LV], and 5-fluorouracil [5FU] 2400 mg/sqm) plus cet (500 mg/sqm) and ave (800 mg) every 2 weeks up to 12 cycles followed by maintenance with 5FU/LV plus cet and ave until disease progression. A safety run-in phase including the first 6 enrolled pts was planned. Due to the occurrence of grade 3-4 diarrhoea in 2 (33%) pts, the protocol study was amended to reduce the irinotecan dose to 130 mg/sqm. Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Fifty-eight pts were needed to detect an increase in median PFS (mPFS) from 10.0 to 19.4 months (mos), setting one-sided α and β errors at 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. The trial is registered at Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT04513951. Results: Between Jun 2020 and Dec 2021, 62 pts were enrolled in 16 Italian centres. Main pts' characteristics were: median age 56 yrs, ECOG PS 0 87%, synchronous metastases 94%, liver-only disease 42%, left-sided primary tumour 89%; all pts had BRAF wt and proficient MMR (pMMR) tumours. The primary endpoint was met. At a median follow-up of 16.0 months, 39 (63%) events were recorded and mPFS was 14.1 months (90% CI 12.0-16.7, Brookmeyer-Crowley test p 〈 0.001). Response rate and disease control rate were 82% and 98%, respectively, and R0 resection rate was 21% (27% in liver-only subgroup). Early tumour shrinkage was achieved in 74% pts and median deepness of response was 56%. In pts treated after study amendment (n = 56), main grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (27%), diarrhoea (27%), skin rash (14%), asthenia (14%), nausea (11%), stomatitis (7%), febrile neutropenia (2%). Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 6% of pts. Overall survival results are still immature. Conclusions: AVETRIC study met its primary endpoint, showing that combining mFOLFOXIRI plus cet and ave achieves promising results in terms of PFS as well as response rate, in pts with pMMR RAS and BRAF wt mCRC. Translational analyses to evaluate the impact of immune-related biomarkers are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04513951 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...