GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS5598-TPS5598
    Kurzfassung: TPS5598 Background: TALA blocks poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activity and traps PARP on single-strand DNA breaks, preventing DNA damage repair (DDR) and causing death of cells with DDR alterations (eg BRCA1/2). a TALA has been approved in multiple countries as monotherapy for germline BRCA1/2-mutated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. ENZA is an androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor and an established therapy for mCRPC. As PARP activity has been shown to support AR function, inhibition of PARP is expected to reduce AR signaling and increase sensitivity to AR-directed therapies. In addition, AR blockade downregulates homologous recombination repair gene transcription which induces ‘ BRCAness ’. Therefore, combining TALA with ENZA in mCRPC may be efficacious regardless of DDR alterations. TALAPRO-2 (NCT03395197) is a Phase III, 2-part study to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of TALA combined with ENZA. Methods: Enrollment goal is 1037 patients (19 patients, part 1 dose-finding; 1,018 patients, part 2 placebo-controlled). Key eligibility criteria: age ≥18 years; asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic mCRPC; ECOG performance status ≤1; metastatic disease (no brain metastases); and no prior life-prolonging systemic therapy for nonmetastatic CRPC or mCRPC. Prior therapies (excluding novel AR inhibitors) in the castration-sensitive (CSPC) setting are allowed. ADT must continue throughout the study. The randomized double-blind portion (part 2) will evaluate safety, efficacy, and PROs of TALA (0.5 mg QD) + ENZA (160 mg QD) vs placebo + ENZA (160 mg QD). Patients are stratified by prior novel hormonal therapy or docetaxel for CSPC (yes or no) and DDR alteration status (deficient vs nondeficient/unknown). The primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), defined as time to progression in soft tissue per RECIST v.1.1 or in bone per PCWG3 criteria by independent review or death. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival. Efficacy will be assessed radiographically every 8 weeks up to Week 25 and every 8–12 weeks thereafter. rPFS will be compared between the two arms by a 1-sided stratified log-rank test. Patient recruitment is ongoing in multiple regions including US, Europe/Eastern Europe, Israel, South America, South Africa, and Asia-Pacific region. a DDR alterations are defined as known/likely pathogenic variants or homozygous deletions. Funding: Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03395197 .
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e16524-e16524
    Kurzfassung: e16524 Background: ENZA and ABI are approved to treat mCRPC in chemotherapy-naïve patients; few real-world analyses exist to compare HA pre- and post-treatment. This study characterized and compared incidence and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of HA pre/post initiation of ENZA or ABI in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients in the US. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years who initiated ENZA or ABI (2 cohorts) from Jan 2014–Dec 2015 were identified retrospectively from MarketScan® Databases. The index date was the initiation of ENZA or ABI after ≥ 6 months of pre-index continuous health plan enrollment. We identified the top 10 HA incidences using ICD-9/10 CM inpatient claims (separate primary and any position) and assessed pre-/post-index IRRs within each cohort. Generalized estimating equations accounting for within-patient correlation and difference-in-differences regression were fitted to compare IRRs between cohorts. Results: A total of 1603 (ENZA, 656; ABI, 947) patients were included. Mean age was 73 years in both cohorts; mean (standard deviation) Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index was 7.9 (2.8) for ENZA and 7.8 (2.9) for ABI; the top 10 HA incidences included cardiac disorder, dyspnea, hypokalemia, liver toxicity, pneumonia, renal impairment, skeletal-related events (any, surgery and fracture) and urinary tract infection. IRRs of HA (any position) due to cardiac disorder, dyspnea, hypokalemia, liver toxicity and pneumonia were significantly higher for post- vs pre-ABI-treated patients (IRR [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.22–2.17] , 1.90 [1.21–2.98], 3.13 [1.46–6.71] , 2.24 [1.36–3.69] and 2.40 [1.41–4.10] ). IRRs of HA (any position) due to cardiac disorder, dyspnea and hypokalemia were significantly lower in the ENZA cohort than ABI cohort (1.02 vs 1.63, 0.84 vs 1.90, 0.65 vs 3.13; all P 〈 0.05). No statistical significance was observed for any other HA comparisons (primary or any position) between or within ENZA and ABI cohorts. Conclusions: Among chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients, significant increases in multiple HA IRRs were observed post- vs pre-ABI treatment, and IRRs were significantly lower for ENZA- vs ABI-treated patients for multiple HA.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2017
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. TPS5092-TPS5092
    Kurzfassung: TPS5092 Background: ENZA is approved to treat men with CRPC. TALA is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that inhibits PARP1/PARP2 and traps PARP on DNA, preventing DNA damage repair (DDR), and causing cell death in BRCA1/2-mutated cells. TALA is approved in the US to treat germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2- locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. A combination of TALA with ENZA in mCRPC may improve clinical outcomes. TALAPRO-2 (NCT03395197) is a 2-part study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and (patient) pt-reported outcomes of the combination treatment. The focus here is on P2 of TALAPRO-2. Methods: Approximately 860 pts are planned to be enrolled in P2 from multinational sites. Pts are aged ≥18 years, have asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic mCRPC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, no brain metastases, and have not received taxanes/novel hormonal therapy (NHT). P2 is a randomized double-blind study that will evaluate safety, efficacy, and pt-reported outcomes of TALA (0.5 mg QD) + ENZA (160 mg QD) vs placebo + ENZA (160 mg QD). Pts will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups: TALA + ENZA, or matching placebo + ENZA. Randomization will be stratified by prior treatment with NHT for castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) or prior treatment with taxane-based chemotherapy for CSPC (yes/no) and DDR mutation status (deficient vs. nondeficient/unknown). The primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), defined as time to progression in soft tissue per RECIST v1.1 or in bone per PCWG3 criteria or death. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Efficacy will be assessed by radiography every 8 weeks up to week 25 and every 8-12 weeks thereafter. The analyses of rPFS will be compared between TALA in combination with ENZA and placebo in combination with ENZA by using a 1-sided stratified log-rank test. OS will be evaluated separately in the all comers and the DDR-deficient populations. Pt recruitment is ongoing. Results: n/a. Conclusions: n/a. Clinical trial information: NCT03395197.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 6_suppl ( 2020-02-20), p. TPS264-TPS264
    Kurzfassung: TPS264 Background: TALA is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that inhibits PARP1/2 and traps PARP on DNA, preventing DNA damage repair (DDR) and causing death of cells with DDR mutations (eg BRCA1/2). TALA is approved in multiple countries for germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2- advanced breast cancer. ENZA is an established therapy for CRPC. PARP1 activity has been shown to support AR function, suggesting that co-blockade of PARP1 may synergize with AR-directed therapy, regardless of DDR deficiency. A combination of TALA with ENZA in mCRPC may improve clinical outcomes in patients with or without DDR-deficient tumors. TALAPRO-2 (NCT03395197) is a 2-part study to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient (pt)-reported outcomes (PROs) of the combination. Methods: Enrollment goal is 1037 pts (19 pts, part 1 dose-finding; 1,018 pts, part 2 placebo-controlled). Key eligibility criteria: age ≥18 y, asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic mCRPC, ECOG performance status ≤1, no brain metastases, and no prior life-prolonging systemic therapy in nonmetastatic CRPC or mCRPC state. Prior docetaxel or novel hormonal therapy (excluding novel AR inhibitors) in castration sensitive (CSPC) setting is allowed. The randomized double-blind portion will evaluate safety, efficacy, and PROs of TALA (0.5 mg QD) + ENZA (160 mg QD) vs placebo + ENZA (160 mg QD). Randomization is stratified by prior NHT or docetaxel for CSPC (yes/no) and DDR mutation status (deficient vs nondeficient/unknown). The primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), defined as time to progression in soft tissue per RECIST v.1.1 or in bone per PCWG3 criteria or death. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Efficacy will be assessed by radiography every 8 weeks up to week 25 and every 8–12 weeks thereafter. rPFS will be compared between two arms by a 1-sided stratified log-rank test. Pt recruitment is ongoing in multiple regions including US, Europe/Eastern Europe, Israel, South America, South Africa, and Asia Pacific region. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03395197.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 7_suppl ( 2019-03-01), p. TPS337-TPS337
    Kurzfassung: TPS337 Background: ENZA is approved to treat men with CRPC. TALA is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that inhibits PARP1/PARP2 and traps PARP on DNA, preventing DNA damage repair (DDR), and causing cell death in BRCA1/2-mutated cells. TALA is approved in the US to treat germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2- locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. A combination of TALA with ENZA in mCRPC may improve clinical outcomes. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) in parts (P) 1 and 2 of this study are aged ≥18 years; have asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic mCRPC, ECOG PS ≤1, and no brain metastases; and have not received taxanes/novel hormonal therapy (NHT). P1 is an open label study to confirm the starting dose of TALA to be given in combination with ENZA. P2 is a randomized double-blind study that will evaluate the safety, efficacy and pt reported outcomes of TALA (0.5 mg QD) + ENZA (160 mg QD) vs placebo + ENZA in 2 cohorts (C). C1: pts with mCRPC (all comers) (N = 560); C2: pts with DDR gene mutations likely to sensitize to PARP inhibition (DDR deficient) (N = 300). Randomization will be stratified by prior treatment with NHT for castration sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) or prior treatment with taxane-based chemotherapy for CSPC (yes/no), and DDR mutation status (deficient vs. nondeficient/unknown). For P1, the primary endpoint is safety; the secondary endpoint is pharmacokinetics of TALA and ENZA. For P2, the primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), defined as time to progression in soft tissue per RECIST v1.1 or in bone per PCWG3 criteria or death and evaluated separately in all comers (C1) and DDR-deficient (DDR-deficient pts from C1 and C2 combined, N = 380 pts) populations. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival. Efficacy will be assessed by radiography every 8 weeks up to week 25 and every 8-12 weeks thereafter. P2 analysis for rPFS is powered at 90% and 85% using a 2-sided log-rank test with alpha of 0.025, respectively, in the all comers and DDR deficient populations. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03395197.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...