GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 457-457
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 457-457
    Abstract: 457 Background: The impact of hospital volume on the outcomes of cancer surgery has been well established. The present studies investigates how race/ethnicity influences the utilization of high-volume centers for hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Methods: Patients that underwent surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC), or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) between 2006 and 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Hospitals were divided into low- and high-volume centers based on the medium number of cancer surgeries per year. Multivariable logistic regression analyses predicting receipt of care at a low-volume center based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, insurance, income, travel distance, geographic location, urban/metro location, and tumor stage were performed. All analyses were performed separately by tumor type. Results: 8,962 patients with HCC, 2,119 with ICC, 3,973 with ECC, 5,125 with AC, and 25,231 with PDAC were identified. Non-Hispanic black patients were more likely to undergo resection for AC (vs. non-Hispanic white: AOR, 1.326; p = 0.0125) or PDAC (vs. non-Hispanic white: AOR, 1.187; p = 0.0002) at a low volume centers. Hispanic patients more often underwent surgery for ECC (vs. non-Hispanic white: AOR, 1.731; p 〈 0.0001) or PDAC (vs. non-Hispanic white: 2.030; p 〈 0.0001) cancer at a low-volume center. Patients of Asian descent were significantly less often treated for HCC at a low volume center (vs. non-Hispanic white: AOR, 0.644; p 〈 0.0001) compared to non-Hispanic whites. Non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, or Asian race/ethnicity did not impact the likelihood of receiving care at a low volume center for any other tumor types. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that race/ethnicity influences the likelihood of receiving care at a high-volume cancer center, even after controlling for other barriers to access to care, including insurance status, income and travel distance.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 330-330
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 330-330
    Abstract: 330 Background: Teaching hospitals that train both general surgery residents and fellows in complex general surgical oncology have become more common. Despite ACGME dictums, attending surgeons may favor either residents or fellows assisting on operations of greater complexity, depending upon a variety of factors, including local surgical culture. This study investigates whether participation of a senior resident versus a fellow impacts outcomes of complex cancer surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy, or gastrectomy with assistance from either a senior resident (PGY-4 or 5) or a fellow (PGY-6 to 8) were identified from the American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2007-2012). Analyses were performed separately for each operation. Propensity-scores were created for the odds of undergoing the operation assisted by a fellow. Patients were matched based on propensity score, and outcomes were compared after matching. Results: In total, 1,160 esophagectomies and 2,432 gastrectomies were identified. Senior resident participation was reported in 60.2% and 86.6%, respectively. Resident involvement was associated with non-white race (17.0% vs. 13.8%; p 〈 0.001), and lower rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (6.4% vs. 11.7%; p 〈 0.001). After matching, rates major complication rates were slightly higher for patients who underwent esophagectomies involving a resident compared to fellow (38.1% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.0447). However, major complications rates were similar for gastrectomy (21.2% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.775). In addition, operative time was shorter for gastrectomy (212 vs. 232 min; p = 0.009) involving a resident compared to a fellow, but comparable for patients who underwent esophagectomy (327 vs. 337 min; p = 0.310). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that senior resident participation in complex cancer operations does not negatively impact operative time or outcomes, compared to involvement of a surgical oncology fellow. Although confounding by operative autonomy may exist, these findings indicate that senior residents should be given the same opportunities as fellows to participate in these potentially more challenging operations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e18649-e18649
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e18649-e18649
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...