GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (7)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 10596-10596
    Abstract: 10596 Background: Anti-EGFR inhibitors are superior to chemotherapy in first-line therapy of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The EURTAC trial was a randomized Phase III trial of erlotinib vs. chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Interim results showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (R. Rosell, ASCO 2011). An accurate rapid in vitro diagnostic for EGFR mutations is needed to select patients for this therapy. Methods: Prospective EGFR mutation testing for the trial was performed on laser-capture microdissected tumor cells using a combination of 3 lab-developed tests (LDTs), including a Length Analysis of Fluorescently-labeled PCR (Genescan) method for exon 19 deletions, a Taqman-based PCR assay for exon 21 mutation with laser-capture macrodissected tumor cells, and secondary Sanger sequencing. A subset of samples from the trial was retrospectively tested with an AS-PCR assay (cobas EGFR mutation test) which detects L858R and 〉 29 exon 19 deletions. The test provides automated results within 8 h; the DNA required can be isolated from one 5-micron tissue section. Four methods were compared: AS-PCR assay, LDT, direct Sanger sequencing and massively parallel sequencing (MPS; 454, Branford, CT). Results: LDT results were obtained for 1044 screened patients. Residual tumor blocks were available for 487 patients (47%), including 303 wild-type, 172 mutant (135 enrolled on the trial) and 12 inconclusive cases by the LDT. Comparison of AS-PCR and LDT results showed a positive percent agreement (PPA) – 93.7% (CI 88.8%, 96.5%), and negative percent agreement (NPA) – 97.5% (94.9%, 98.8%). Comparison of AS-PCR and Sanger results showed a PPA of 96.6% (91.7%, 98.7%) but an NPA of 88.3% (84.1%, 91.5%). Among 34 AS-PCR + /Sanger - case, MPS confirmed the presence of exon 19 deletions in 25 cases and L858R mutations in 7. Direct comparison of AS-PCR and MPS results showed a PPA of 93.1% (88.1%, 96.1%) and NPA of 97.7% (95.0%, 98.9%). Clinical outcomes for cases with mutations detected by the AS-PCR test will be presented. Conclusions: The AS-PCR assay was highly concordant with the LDT and MPS, and more sensitive than Sanger sequencing.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 29, No. 15_suppl ( 2011-05-20), p. 4036-4036
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 22 ( 2022-08-01), p. 2426-2435
    Abstract: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy screening using cell-free DNA derived from maternal plasma can incidentally raise suspicion for cancer. Diagnostic routing after malignancy suspicious–NIPT faces many challenges. Here, we detail malignancy suspicious–NIPT cases, and describe the clinical characteristics, chromosomal aberrations, and diagnostic routing of the patients with a confirmed malignancy. Clinical lessons can be learned from our experience. METHODS: Patients with NIPT results indicative of a malignancy referred for tumor screening between April 2017 and April 2020 were retrospectively included from a Dutch nationwide NIPT implementation study, TRIDENT-2. NIPT profiles from patients with confirmed malignancies were reviewed, and the pattern of chromosomal aberrations related to tumor type was analyzed. We evaluated the diagnostic contribution of clinical and genetic examinations. RESULTS: Malignancy suspicious–NIPT results were reported in 0.03% after genome-wide NIPT, and malignancies confirmed in 16 patients (16/48, 33.3%). Multiple chromosomal aberrations were seen in 23 of 48 patients with genome-wide NIPT, and a malignancy was confirmed in 16 patients (16/23, 69.6%). After targeted NIPT, 0.005% malignancy suspicious–NIPT results were reported, in 2/3 patients a malignancy was confirmed. Different tumor types and stages were diagnosed, predominantly hematologic malignancies (12/18). NIPT data showed recurrent gains and losses in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas and classic Hodgkin lymphomas. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were most informative in diagnosing the malignancy. CONCLUSION: In 231,896 pregnant women, a low percentage (0.02%) of NIPT results were assessed as indicative of a maternal malignancy. However, when multiple chromosomal aberrations were found, the risk of a confirmed malignancy was considerably high. Referral for extensive oncologic examination is recommended, and may be guided by tumor-specific hallmarks in the NIPT profile.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 16, No. 6 ( 1998-06), p. 2060-2064
    Abstract: There is no consensus on the treatment of patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) who develop primary or secondary resistance to frontline therapies. We report our experience on the activity and toxicity of fludarabine in 71 patients with WM resistant to prior chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 1991 to June 1995, 71 patients were included in this retrospective study. The median age, median time from diagnosis to treatment, median immunoglobulin M (IgM) level, and median number of previous treatments were 68 years (range, 42 to 81), 5.9 years (range, 0.6 to 20), 35 g/L (range, 5 to 126), and two (range, one to four), respectively. RESULTS Seventy-one patients received a median of six courses of fludarabine. Twenty-one (30%) responded with a partial response and 50 (70%) were considered as treatment failures. Forty-six patients died: 10 in the responder group and 36 in the failure group. Twenty-five patients were alive with a median follow-up time of 34 months. The overall median survival time of all treated patients was 23 months. The time to treatment failure was 32 months. The only factor that favorably influenced the response to fludarabine was a longer interval between the first treatment and the start of fludarabine. Pretreatment factors associated with shorter survival in the entire population were hemoglobin level less than 95 g/L (P = .02) and platelet count less than 75 x 10(9)/L (P = .02). CONCLUSION The responses rate in this population with a poor prognosis is close to that reported in shorter series. Patients with WM who are resistant to alkylating agents should be identified early, so that salvage therapy with nucleoside analogs can be started without delay.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 1998
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 3_suppl ( 2015-01-20), p. 109-109
    Abstract: 109 Background: Salvage esophagectomy (SE) has traditionally conferred a high rate of mortality and morbidity in small, monocenter, and old publications. The aim of this large multicenter study was to assess the impact of SE following definitive chemoradiotherapy (SALV) on clinical outcomes. Methods: Data from consecutive adult patients undergoing resection for esophageal cancer in 30 European centers from 2000–2010 were collected. Among this population, the first step was to compare SALV (n=308) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by planned esophagectomy (NCRS group, n=540) groups. The second step was to focus on the SALV group and to compare patients that benefited from SE for persistent (PERS group, n=234) versus recurrent (REC group, n=74) disease. Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses were used to compensate for differences in some baseline characteristics. Results: Comparison of SALV and NCRS groups: In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (8.4% vs. 9.3%). The only significant differences in complications were seen for anastomotic leak (17.2% vs. 10.7%; P=0.007) and surgical site infection, which were both increased in the SALV group. At 3 years, the groups had similar overall (43.3% vs. 40.1%; P=0.542) and disease-free (39.2% vs. 32.8%; P=0.232) survivals, along-with similar overall (46.8% vs. 47.9%; P=0.829), locoregional (18.8% vs. 15.9%; P=0.544), distant (24.3% vs. 28.1%; P=0.949) and mixed (13.0% vs. 13.5%; P=0.888) tumor recurrence. Comparison of PERS and REC groups: There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of in-hospital mortality or major complications, apart from reoperation, which was increased in the PERS group (17.9% vs. 8.1%; P=0.042). Overall (23.4% vs 39.2%, p=0.054) and disease free survivals (21.1% vs37.8%, p=0.070) were lower in the PERS group. Conclusions: The results of this large multi-center study suggest that SE can offer acceptable short and long-term outcomes in experienced centers. Randomized controlled trials are required to validate the SE strategy as a viable option in complete esophageal cancer responders.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 33 ( 2015-11-20), p. 3866-3873
    Abstract: The aim of this large multicenter study was to assess the impact of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (SALV) on clinical outcome. Patients and Methods Data from consecutive adult patients undergoing resection for esophageal cancer in 30 European centers from 2000 to 2010 were collected. First, groups undergoing SALV (n = 308) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by planned esophagectomy (NCRS; n = 540) were compared. Second, patients who benefited from SALV for persistent (n = 234) versus recurrent disease (n = 74) were compared. Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses were used to compensate for differences in some baseline characteristics. Results SALV versus NCRS groups: In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (8.4% v 9.3%). The only significant differences in complications were seen for anastomotic leak (17.2% v 10.7%; P = .007) and surgical site infection, which were both more frequent in the SALV group. At 3 years, groups had similar overall (43.3% v 40.1%; P = .542) and disease-free survival (39.2% v 32.8%; P = .232) after matching, along with a similar recurrence pattern. Persistent versus recurrent disease groups: There were no significant differences between groups in incidence of in-hospital mortality or major complications. At 3 years, overall (40.9% v 56.2%; P = .046) and disease-free survival (36.6% v 51.6%; P = .095) were lower in the persistent disease group. Conclusion The results of this large multicenter study from the modern era suggest that SALV can offer acceptable short- and long-term outcomes in selected patients at experienced centers. Persistent cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy seems to be more biologically aggressive, with poorer survival compared with recurrent cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. TPS4131-TPS4131
    Abstract: TPS4131 Background: Expression of the PD-1 ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 has been reported in ≈ 40% of pts with E/GEJ cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis. In a phase 3 trial, the PD-1 inhibitor nivo demonstrated an OS benefit vs placebo (HR, 0.63; P 〈 0.0001), resulting in a 37% reduction in the risk of death and double the OS rate at 12 mo (27% vs 11%) in pts with advanced gastric (G)/GEJ cancer refractory to ≥ 2 lines of chemotherapy (Kang YK, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35 (suppl 4S) [abstract 2]). In this study, nivo was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of the placebo arm. These results indicate that nivo could be a new standard of care (SOC) for pts with heavily pretreated advanced G/GEJ cancer and provide a strong rationale to explore nivo in earlier lines of treatment for G/E/GEJ cancer. Currently, no effective adjuvant SOC is available after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by resection for pts with E/GEJ cancer. This multinational, double-blind, phase 3 trial will evaluate nivo as an adjuvant therapy for pts with resected E/GEJ cancer (CheckMate 577; NCT02743494). Methods: In this study, an estimated 760 pts aged ≥ 18 years with stage II/III E/GEJ cancer are randomized to receive nivo or placebo. Prior to randomization, pts must have completed preoperative CRT followed by surgery and been diagnosed with residual pathologic disease after being surgically rendered free of disease with negative margins following complete resection. Pts with stage 4 resectable disease, cervical esophageal cancer, or those who have not received concurrent CRT prior to surgery are not eligible for study enrollment. Primary endpoints are OS and disease-free survival. Other key endpoints include the OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT02743494.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...