GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (24)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 6_suppl ( 2021-02-20), p. 212-212
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 6_suppl ( 2021-02-20), p. 212-212
    Abstract: 212 Background: This was a prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (SEU) for prostate cancer. The primary end-point was accuracy of SEU to detect prostate cancer. The exploratory end-point was to analyze the prognostic significance of SEU positibity after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients diagnosed as prostate cancer. Methods: In all cases locations of suspected prostate cancer were examined with SEU, digital rectal examination (DRE), B-mode (B), and power-doppler ultrasound (PDU) before prostate biopsy. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of SEU, RE, B, and PD. Among prostate cancer cases, effect of SEU positivity on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy was compared with that of DRE, B, and PDU. Results: Of 687 cases 416 cases (60.6%) were prostate cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 52.9%, 63.5%, 69.0%, 46.7%, and 57.1% by DRE, 69.2%, 43.9%, 65.5%, 48.2%, and 59.2% by B, 66.6%, 59.0%, 71.4%, 53.5%, and 63.6% by PDU, and 66.1%, 70.1%, 77.2%, 57.4%, and 67.7% by SEU, respectively. SEU was the highest in specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy rate. Eighty three patients underwent radical prostatectomy. The SEU + group (69.3%) had a significantly poor prognosis compared to the SEU− group (88.7%) on the five-year BCR-free survival rate (p 〈 0.05). Univariate analysis showed SEU+ (HR 3.5; p = 0.02), DRE+ (HR 2.7; p = 0.04), PDU+ (HR2.6; p = 0.09), and B+ (HR 2.0; p = 0.21). SEU was the highest prognostic factor on BCR after radical prostatectomy. Conclusions: Sonazoid was able to visualize even small blood vessels in the prostate. SEU showed the highest accuracy for cancer detection and was the highest prognostic factor on BCR in the univariate analysis. To obtain the maximum benefit of Sonazoid, further examinations are needed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e15527-e15527
    Abstract: e15527 Background: Predicting the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) would be of clinical value in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We tested the hypothesis that serum inflammatory markers are associated with clinical outcome in mRCC patients at favorable or intermediate prognostic risk treated with first-line sunitinib. Methods: Eighty-nine mRCC patients were prospectively monitored at baseline (day 0) during sunitinib treatment. Serum interleukin-6 and 8 levels were determined by CLEIA and ELISA, respectively. A high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured using laser nephelometry. Correlations between baseline interleukin-6, 8, hs-CRP levels and response to sunitinib, and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined. Results: Median PFS was 9.2 months. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; percent complete responses+partial responses +stable disease 24 weeks) was 57.3%. Baseline interleukin-8 (P=0.0240) and hs-CRP (P=0.0060) was associated with CBR. No association between baseline interleukin-6 and 8 with PFS was observed. However, baseline hs-CRP were associated with PFS (P=0.0016; unit risk 1.010; 95% CI 1.004 to 1.017). Conclusions: Baseline serum inflammatory markers could be of clinical interest in sunitinib-treated mRCC patiens to predict outcome. Baseline hs-CRP serum levels warrant further study. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009622.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 628-628
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 6_suppl ( 2018-02-20), p. 628-628
    Abstract: 628 Background: LDA in solid RCC on CT is often interpreted as ‘central necrosis’ in routine clinical practice. However, the details of clinicopathological (CP) features of LDA of RCC on CT and their prognostic significance have not been shown. We retrospectively investigated LDA of RCC to clarify the CP features and prognostic significance. Methods: Of 428 surgically treated patients for RCC between January 2007 and March 2017 at Nippon Medical School hospital, we found 267 cases who had dynamic CT performed before operation. Among them, we selected and analyzed 199 consecutive cases whose tumor had low density area and whose cancer status resulted in no evidence of disease after surgery. We first examined pathological features of LDA. Then, we examined the correlation between pathological features of LDA and CP parameters and prognosis. The differences of values between the three groups were examined with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was examined with the Kaplan-Meyer curves and the log-rank test. Results: The histology of LDA was divided into two groups: central necrosis (+) or (-: NN). Central necrosis (+) group was further divided into two subgroups: with neutrophilic infiltration (NI+) and without NI (NI-). This means that, in the end, there were three groups according to microscopic findings: group A (NI+, n = 20, 10%), B (NI-, n = 55, 28%), C (NN, n = 124, 62%). The pathological features of the NN group were composed of hyaline degeneration, hydropic degeneration, fibrosis, scars, and so on. The results of the comparison between CP parameters among the three groups were as follows: C-reactive protein, WBC, platelet, and alkaline phosphatase are statistically higher, and hemoglobin, triglyceride, and albumin were statistically lower in group A. CT value was statistically lower in group A and B. Median follow-up was 35months, and 3-year RFS (group A, B, C, p value) was (49.8%, 77.9%, 94.3%, p 〈 0.0001). Conclusions: In RCC patients only about one-third of LDA on CT was shown to be central necrosis. Necrosis with NI was clinically most closely associated with poor prognosis. Central necrosis may be predictive from lower CT values compared to non-necrotic tissues.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 7_suppl ( 2015-03-01), p. 265-265
    Abstract: 265 Background: In PREVAIL, an international phase 3 randomized trial, treatment with ENZA decreased the risk of radiographic progression or death by 81% and the risk of death by 29% compared with placebo. We evaluated efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic exposure with ENZA in the Japanese subgroup of patients participating in PREVAIL. Methods: Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC progressing on androgen deprivation therapies were randomized 1:1 to ENZA 160 mg or placebo until discontinuation upon radiographic progression or initiation of chemotherapy. Continued androgen-deprivation therapy was required. Coprimary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as a confirmed ≥50% reduction from baseline to nadir. Results: A total of 1,717 patients (ENZA: 872, placebo: 845) were randomized in PREVAIL, of which 61 patients were Japanese (ENZA: 28, placebo: 33). The trial was halted after a planned interim analysis at which hazard ratios calculated for OS (0.71; 95%CI: 0.60-0.84) and rPFS (0.19; 95%CI: 0.15-0.23) showed significant benefit of ENZA vs placebo. Hazard ratios for OS and rPFS in Japanese patients were 0.60 (95%CI: 0.20-1.78) and 0.29 (95%CI: 0.030-2.95), respectively. Time to chemotherapy was delayed from a median 10 months on placebo vs not yet reached on ENZA, with a hazard ratio of 0.46 (95%CI: 0.22-0.96). PSA responses were more common in Japanese patients receiving ENZA (61%) vs placebo (21%) (treatment effect = 39.5%; 95%CI: 16.7%-62.3%). Plasma concentration of ENZA was slightly higher in the Japanese subgroup: geometric mean C min = 13.8 µg/mL vs 12.3 µg/mL in the non-Japanese cohort at 13 weeks. In the Japanese subgroup adverse events (AEs) ≥ Grade 3 were reported by 9/28 patients (32%) on ENZA vs 13/33 patients (39%) on placebo. Treatment-related AEs ≥ Grade 3 were rare: in the ENZA arm (1/28; 3.6%) and in the placebo arm (2/33; 6.1%). Conclusions: Theefficacy and safety results in the Japanese subgroup were generally consistent with the overall results from the PREVAIL trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01212991.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 2_suppl ( 2016-01-10), p. 167-167
    Abstract: 167 Background: The ALSYMPCA study was conducted to evaluate the alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical Radium-223 Chloride (BAY 88-8223) in patients with symptomatic bone metastases in Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This trial met its primary endpoint of overall survival at the time of pre-planned interim analysis. Post hoc analysis showed a reduction from baseline in total ALP at 12 weeks (32% reduction in the BAY 88-8223 arm vs. 37% increase in placebo arm, P 〈 0.001) (Sartor et al. ASCO 2013). We are reporting here a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study of BAY 88-8223 in Japanese patients with symptomatic CRPC with bone metastases. Methods: Eligible patients had progressive, symptomatic CRPC with at least 2 bone metastases on bone scintigraphy and no known visceral metastases; were receiving Best Standard of Care; and either had previously received docetaxel, were docetaxel ineligible, or had refused docetaxel. Patients received 6 injections of radium-223 (50 kBq/kg IV) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage of change in total ALP from baseline at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to symptomatic skeletal event, percentage of change in bone ALP/PSA/biomarkers, and safety. Results: A total of 67 subjects were enrolled; 18 were screening failures, and 49 were received to the study treatment and received at least one administration from September 2013 to May 2014. The mean percent change in total ALP from baseline at 12 weeks was -19.3% (95%CI: -28.0% to -10.7%). The results of secondary endpoints will be presented. The safety and tolerability profile for BAY 88-8223 were highly favorable and only 1 subject (2.0%) experienced lymphocyte count decreased as a Grade 4 adverse event, and there was no death during the study treatment and within 30 days after the last injection of study treatment. Conclusions: The reduction from baseline in total ALP at 12 weeks seen in this phase II study is consistent with the results shown in ALSYMPCA study. Overall, BAY 88-8223 was well tolerated in Japanese patients with CRPC and bone metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT01929655.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 4_suppl ( 2014-02-01), p. 455-455
    Abstract: 455 Background: Everolimus has shown the efficacy and the safety in the phase III trial (RECORD-1) in patients with mRCC after failure of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-TKI. However, 26% of patients received two TKIs (sunitinib and sorafenib) as previous therapy in RECORD-1. In addition, as pre-treatment before TKI, 65% of patients received cytokine therapy and 13% of patients received chemotherapy. Therefore, there is still no clear evidence of everolimus as second line setting after failure of 1st-line TKI therapy. Methods: This study is an open-label, multi-center, single-arm, phase II trial. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, time-to-treatment-failure, safety and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, FKSI-DRS, EQ-5D). Key eligibility criteria are RCC with clear cell component, patients who received one TKI as first line therapy, patients who did not receive cytokine and chemotherapy and ECOG performance status 0-1. Results: 57 patients were enrolled from 02/11 to 12/12. Median age was 63 years, common sites of metastasis were lung (32.7%) and bone (12.2%), 79.6% had previous nephrectomy, previous TKI therapy were sunitinib (69.4%), sorafenib (22.4%) and axitinib (8.2%). Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7-6.0). 8.2% had partial response and 57.1% had stable disease according to RECIST v.1.0. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of all grades was 95.9%. Major AEs were stomatitis (49.0%), hypertriglyceridemia (26.5%) and hypercholesterolemia (24.5%). Serious AEs were stomatitis (10.2%), interstitial lung disease (6.1%) and rash (6.1%). There were no treatment related deaths. All QOL scores were not changed at 2 months, while dyspnea and global health scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 and FKSI-DRS score were worsened at 4 months. Conclusions: This study is a first report of everolimus as second line setting after failure of 1st-line TKI. Further study and long-term follow-up would be warranted. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004742.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 6_suppl ( 2021-02-20), p. 473-473
    Abstract: 473 Background: Even today, when several immune checkpoint Inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTC) still remains the mainstay for first-line treatment. We believe that the prognostic factors for the first-line CTC have become more important again and need to be re-analyzed. Current guidelines do not yet provide recommendations for any serum tumor markers in patients with mUC. Previous studies have shown that serum cytokeratin 19 fragments levels (sCK) were correlated with depth of tumor invasion and metastatic burden in patients with bladder cancer. In this study we evaluated whether sCK, and other clinical parameters could predict overall survival (OS) in patients with mUC treated with CTC. Methods: Two hundreds fifty two patients with mUC received CTC from December 2006 to 2016 at our institution. sCK had been measured in 128 patients at diagnosis of mUC. OS rate were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier curves and log–rank test. Multivariate analysis was carried out using the Cox hazards model. Tumor burden (TB) was measured based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumor (version 1.1). Results: Of 128 patients, with median age of 72 (44-93), 36 (28%) had lung metastasis, 11 (9%) had bone metastasis, 10 (8%) had liver metastasis (LM). Ninety five (74%) patients received platinum based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. During the median follow-up period of 19 (1-89) months, 72 patients (70%) had died. A 1-year (1y) OS was 51% and a 2y-OS was 36%. On univariate analysis, performance status (PS) (HR2.0, p 〈 0.005), sCK (HR3.9, p 〈 0.001), CRP (HR4.0, p 〈 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (HR1.9, p 〈 0.049), LM (HR2.0, p=0.042) and TB (HR2.4, p 〈 0.001) were the significant prognostic factors for OS. On multivariate analysis, PS (HR2.0, 95%CI (1.05-3.85) p=0.036 ), sCK (HR3.1, 95%CI (1.3-8.3), p=0.011), and LM (HR3.0, 95%CI (1.06-6.98), p=0.022) were the independent prognostic factors for OS. Based on these 3 factors we divided patients into three groups, good risk (G, 0 factor), intermediate risk (I, 1 factor) and poor risk (P, 2-3 factors). There was a significant difference between the three groups. (G vs I: p 〈 0.001, I vs P: p=0.001). Conclusions: PS, sCK, and LM were the independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with mUC receiving CTC. For the patients in good or intermediate risk with this score, early exposure of ICIs should be performed after CTCs. Treatment strategy should be changed in patients with poor risk since CTC is primary refractory in such population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 7_suppl ( 2019-03-01), p. 45-45
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 7_suppl ( 2019-03-01), p. 45-45
    Abstract: 45 Background: Does tumor location affect prostate cancer prognosis? To clarify this question we conducted a retrospective study to characterize the incidence and prognostic significance of tumor location of prostate cancer. Methods: From 2000 to 2017, radical prostatectomy with no neoadjuvant therapy was performed in 916 cases in our hospital. Serial whole mount sections were reviewed to determine the incidence, clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of tumor location in the prostate gland. For the tumor location, we defined the subzones, which were made from subdivision of the McNeal’s zonal anatomy, are shown in Table 1 in detail. The peripheral zone (PZ) is composed of 8 subzones including A1, A2, A3 , M1, M2, M3, M4, M5. The transition zone (TZ) is composed of 5 subzones including T1, T2, T3, T4 and B1. The central zone (CZ) is composed of 3 subzones including M6, B2 and B3. Results: The median age was 67 and PSA was 8.6 ng/ml. The subzonal tumor incidence divided by all cases was the highest in A2, followed by M4, A1, M3, T2 in that order, while the lowest in B3, followed by M6, T4, T3, B1 in that order. The median follow-up time was 67 months. A 5-year PSA failure rate (5Y-PSAFR) was 23%. Among the subzones, the highest 5Y-PSAFR was seen in B3, followed by M6, B2, T4, A3, and the lowest was seen in M4, A2, T2, A1 in that order. A multivariate analysis for PSAF risk among subzones showed that B3 (HR 8.6, p 〈 0.0001) and M6 (HR 3.3, p = 0.03) were the independent high risk subzones. Conclusions: We demonstrated that the cancer incidence and prognosis varies according to the location within the prostate gland. The B3 and M6 around the ejaculatory duct showed the lowest incidence, while these locations also had the highest recurrence risk. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 7_suppl ( 2019-03-01), p. 164-164
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 7_suppl ( 2019-03-01), p. 164-164
    Abstract: 164 Background: TAS-115, a novel multi-kinase (eg, MET, VEGFR) inhibitor has also shown to inhibits Feline McDonough Sarcoma oncogene (FMS) kinase, Anti-tumor activity against bone metastases was observed in the preclinical and phase1 study. In this phase 2 study, the efficacy and safety of TAS-115 were evaluated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients (pts) with bone metastases. Methods: This was a phase 2, open-label, multi-arm study for CRPC pts with bone metastases to evaluate the clinical anti-tumor activity of TAS-115. Pts who had visceral metastases were ineligible for this study. TAS-115 was given orally, once daily, and schedule of 5 days on/2 days off each week was repeated. This study had 2 cohorts (A and B). In cohort A, TAS-115 ranging from 200 to 400 mg/day with abiraterone acetate was given to pts prior to docetaxel. In cohort B, CRPC pts who had symptomatic bone metastases, post or unfit to docetaxel, were randomized in a 1:1 to 400 or 600 mg/day of TAS-115. The primary endpoint was bone scan index (BSI) response rate at week 12, defined as ≥ 30% decrease of BSI from baseline. BSI is a quantitative assessment of bone scan data calculated by software (BONE NAVI). Results: From Nov 2016 to Jul 2018, a total of 50 pts received TAS-115 (24 pts in cohort A and 26 pts in cohort B). BSI response rate at week 12 and best BSI response was 20.8 % and 37.5% in cohort A, and 15.4 % and 19.2% in cohort B, respectively. Any reduction of BSI was observed in 70.8% of cohort A and 61.5% of cohort B. In cohort B, pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory short form and improvement was observed in 61.5% of pts. Furthermore, the reduction of bone-turnover marker (BAP, P1NP, NTx and TRACP-5b) were observed in both cohorts, but not PSA response. The major (≥ 10%) Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse drug reactions were hypophosphataemia (21%) in cohort A, and anemia (23%), hypophosphataemia (12%) and neutrophil count decreased (12%) in cohort B. Conclusions: Preliminary anti-tumor activity to bone lesion and improved pain were observed in CRPC pts with bone metastases, and safety of TAS-115 was acceptable. TAS-115 could be a novel therapeutic agent with a favorable safety profile for CRPC with bone metastases. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-163448.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 4_suppl ( 2014-02-01), p. LBA1-LBA1
    Abstract: LBA1^ Background: Enzalutamide, an orally administered androgen receptor inhibitor, improved overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC who had received prior docetaxel therapy (Scher et al, NEJM 367:13, 2012). This study examined whether enzalutamide could prolong OS and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic chemotherapy-naive men with mCRPC. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 study (NCT01212991), chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC were stratified by site and randomized 1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo. OS and rPFS were co-primary endpoints and analyzed for the intent-to-treat population. Planned sample size was 1,680 with 765 deaths to achieve 80% power to detect a target OS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.815 with a type I error rate of 0.049 and a single interim analysis at 516 (67%) deaths. The co-primary endpoint of rPFS had sufficient power to detect a target HR of 0.57 and a type I error rate of 0.001 with a minimum of 410 events. Results: A total of 1,717 men were randomized (1,715 treated) between September 2010 and September 2012. The interim analysis at 539 deaths showed a statistically significant benefit of enzalutamide over placebo with a 30% reduction in risk of death (OS: HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59-0.83; P 〈 0.0001) and an 81% reduction in risk of radiographic progression or death (rPFS: HR 0.19; 95% CI: 0.15-0.23; P 〈 0.0001). At the time of the analysis, 28% of enzalutamide patients and 35% of placebo patients had died. Estimated median OS was 32.4 months (mo) (95% CI, 31.5–upper limit not yet reached [NYR]) in t he enzalutamide arm vs 30.2 mo (95% CI, 28–upper limit NYR) in the placebo arm. Median rPFS was NYR (95% CI: 13.8–upper limit NYR) in the enzalutamide arm vs 3.9 mo (95% CI: 3.7-5.4) in the placebo arm. Seizure events were reported in two patients. The Independent Data Monitoring Committee considered the benefit-risk ratio to favor enzalutamide and recommended stopping the study and crossing placebo patients to enzalutamide. Secondary endpoints and safety analysis will be presented. Conclusions: Treatment with enzalutamide significantly improves OS and rPFS in men with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01212991.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...