GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (1)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (1)
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 662-662
    Kurzfassung: 662 Background: Little is known about the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic head (Ph) and pancreatic body/tail (Pbt) cancer. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis of BR pancreatic cancer (PC) according to the location of the primary tumor. Methods: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients with BR PC who initiated neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between March 2015 and April 2019. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between Ph and Pbt cancer. Furthermore, multivariate survival analysis was performed using cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 104 patients with BR PC (median age 68, male 49%) were included in this study. The location of the tumor was Ph 72 and Pbt 32, respectively. The initial regimen of NAC was nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in 102 and gemcitabine in 2, respectively. The median cycle of NAC was 4. Median age, sex, primary tumor size, performance status, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and serum level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 at the time of the initiation of NAC were not significantly different between Ph and Pbt cancer, while the modified glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was lower in Pbt cancer (mGPS = 0; 78% vs. 94%, p = 0.05). R0/R1 resection rate (81% vs. 69%, p = 0.21) and median survival time (928 days vs. NA, p = 0.13) were also not different between Ph and Pbt cancer. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that R0/R1 resection (HR, 0.11; p 〈 0.01) and Ph (HR, 2.29; p = 0.03) were independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with BR PC. Conclusions: Although R0/R1 resection rate was similar between BR Ph and Pbt cancer, Pbt cancer had a higher rate of mGPS score of 0 compared to Ph cancer. Furthermore, R0/R1 resection (HR, 0.11) and Ph (HR, 2.29) were independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with BR PC.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...