GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e16249-e16249
    Abstract: e16249 Background: Patients with pancreatic cancer face many nutrition-related concerns, although few guidelines exist to direct clinical nutrition services in this population. Examining quality outcomes for patients in clinics with and without access to a Registered Dietitians (RD’s) can help examine the contributions of RD’s in this area. Methods: A retrospective cohort design was used to compare Total Cost of Care (TCOC), hospital admissions and Length of Stay (LOS), and Emergency Department (ED) and Observation visits for patients with pancreatic cancer who were enrolled in the Oncology Care Model (OCM) during Performance Periods (PP) 1-6 (July 1, 2016–June 30, 2019). Patient deaths during the initial episode of care were also examined. Patients from a geographically concentrated metropolitan hub were divided into cohorts based on clinic access to an RD. Each patient’s initial six-month OCM episode of care was used for analysis. Results: Of the 389 OCM patients identified with pancreatic cancer from PP1-6, 203 were treated at 10 clinics with an RD and 186 in 17 clinics without an RD. In the RD cohort, 43.3% of patients were admitted to the hospital with an average LOS of 8.9 days. By contrast, 52.2% of patients in the non-RD cohort were admitted to the hospital with an average LOS of 10.0 days. TCOC for the 6-month episode was lower in the RD cohort at $37,185 versus the non-RD cohort at $40,907. During the initial 6-month episode of care, 37% of patients in the non-RD cohort died during the initial 6-month episode vs only 28% in the RD cohort. A higher percentage of patients in the RD cohort (35%) had ED or Observation visits, compared with the non- RD cohort (32%). Conclusions: Amongst OCM patients with pancreatic cancers, treatment at a clinic with an RD was associated with lower TCOC, reduced LOS for patients that were admitted to the hospital, and lower percentage of deaths in the first 6-month episode of care. The percentage of patients with ED and Observational visits was slightly higher in the cohort that had access to an RD. This analysis shows the potential benefit of RD services in an outpatient setting and justifies further study. Future multilevel modeling will evaluate the statistical significance of these results.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. 264-264
    Abstract: 264 Background: Patients with gastric and esophageal cancers are at high risk for malnutrition. Appropriate nutrition care provided by a registered dietitian (RD) as part of a multidisciplinary care team is supported by evidenced-based guidelines and clinical studies focused on surgical outcomes. However, Medicare does not routinely cover outpatient RD services for oncology patients which limits access to this care. Examining quality outcomes for patients in clinics with and without access to a RD can help define the value of this service. Methods: We used a retrospective cohort design to analyze Total Cost of Care (TCOC), hospital admissions and Length of Stay (LOS), and Emergency Department (ED) and Observation visits for patients with gastric and esophageal cancer who were enrolled in the Oncology Care Model (OCM) during Performance Periods (PP) 1-6 (July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2019). We divided patients from a geographically concentrated metropolitan hub into cohorts based on clinic access to a RD. Each patient’s initial OCM episode of care was used for analysis. Results: We identified 253 OCM patients with gastric or esophageal cancer from PP1-6. Of these, 109 were treated at 9 clinics with an RD and 144 in 16 clinics without a RD. In the RD cohort 42.2% of patients were admitted to the hospital with a LOS of 6.8 days. In the non-RD cohort 45.8% of patients were admitted to the hospital with a LOS of 9.4 days. TCOC for the 6-month episode was lower in the RD cohort at $ 39,033 vs the non-RD cohort at $49,359. There were 0.56 ED and observation visits per patient in the RD cohort and 0.8 ED and observation visits per patient in the cohort without a RD. Conclusions: Amongst OCM patients with gastric and esophageal cancers, treatment at a clinic with a RD was associated with lower TCOC, reduced LOS for patients that were admitted to the hospital and fewer ED and observational visits. This analysis shows the potential benefit of RD services in an outpatient setting and justifies further study. Future prospective studies will need to evaluate which interventions are most impactful.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...