GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 2568-2568
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 2568-2568
    Abstract: 2568 Background: Q-1802 is a humanized bispecific antibody that targets both the tumor -specific antigen CLDN18.2 and the immune checkpoint PD-L1. Methods: This is a first-in-human, phase 1a/1b, multicenter, dose escalation and dose expansion study of Q-1802 administered intravenously to adult pts with resistant/refractory advanced or metastatic solid tumors who had failed standard therapies. Monotherapy of Q-1802 was conducted in 20-30 enrolled subjects. In the dose escalation phase (phase 1a), an accelerated titration followed by a 3+3 design was used to assess the safety and tolerability of Q-1802 monotherapy (dose range 0.1 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg); and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Q-1802 was administered Q3w on a 21-day treatment cycle and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period. Tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 were performed once every 6 weeks (2 cycles). Q-1802 PK and PD analyses were performed. Results: As of Jan 20, 2022, a total of 9 patients (median age 57y; most patients received ≥3 prior regimens) were enrolled in phase 1a with DLT evaluation of the 20 mg/kg cohort currently in progress. The most common tumor types were GI cancers. There were no DLTs up to 10 mg/kg of Q-1802, inclusive. Phase 1a with DLT evaluation of the 20 mg/kg cohort currently in progress. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were Gastrointestinal AE (66.7%, 6/9), including nausea 6/9 (66.7%), vomiting 5/9 (55.6%), abdominal pain 2/9 (22.2%) and diarrhea 2/9 (22.2%). The second common TRAEs were IRR (infusion related reaction) (33.3%, 3/9), including Fatigue 3/9 (33.3%), Fever 2/9 (22.2%), Chill 2/9 (22.2%), face pain 1/9 (11.1%). There was G1/2 except for one patient experienced a G3 skin rash, and one patient reported with a G3 Gastrointestinal AE. Two SAEs (G2 fever and G3 Gastrointestinal AE) were reported, both were considered as possibly related to study drug, but recovered shortly. No death reported due to study related treatment. Safety evaluation of the 20 mg/kg dose level is in progress. One Gastric cancer patient (moderate CLDN18.2 expression at baseline) with prior heavily treatment observed clinical benefit and response with Non-CR/Non-PD at first tumor assessment at dose of 10mg/kg and continues the therapy. Q-1802 drug exposure increased with increasing dose. The elimination of Q-1802 appears to follow first-order elimination kinetics. Conclusions: Q-1802 bsABs has presented safe and well-tolerated profile up to doses of 10 mg/kg. The dose escalation is still in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT04856150.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e18085-e18085
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e18085-e18085
    Abstract: e18085 Background: BRCA1/2 mutated cancers are homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficient and often sensitive to drugs targeting DNA repair pathway. Emerging evidences suggest tumors with mutations in other HRR genes might also respond favorably to DNA repair pathway targeted drugs; however, the results were inconclusive. Genomic instability is characterized by telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), large-scale transition (LST) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Here, we developed an HRD score based on assessing the status of these patterns in tumors. Methods: 73 cancer patients, including 36 breast cancer (BC), 35 ovarian cancer (OC) and 2 prostate cancer (PC) patients were recruited. 28 were BRCA-deficient tumors (10 BCs, 17OCs and 1 PC) harboring pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline mutation in BRCA1/2 with LOH. 13 BRCA-mutated tumors (10 BCs, 2 OCs and 1 PC) carried P/LP BRCA1/2 mutation without LOH. The rest 33 were HRR wild type controls (16 BCs and 16 OCs). All samples were profiled using a panel consisting of 24 classic HRR genes and their adjacent SNPs. The scores for TAI, LST and LOH were developed separately and an incorporated HRD score based on the 3 patterns was established. Clinical data of 42 OC pts were collected to validate the algorithm. Results: All pairwise correlations of TAI, LST and LOH scores showed high correlations (TAI vs. LOH: r = 0.89; TAI vs. LST: r = 0.92; LST vs. LOH: r = 0.83). The univariate logistic regression was used to assess the correlation of the score with BRCA deficiency. In the cohort of BRCA-deficient vs. HRR-negative, the scores of TAI (P = 9.72 x 10 −4 ), LST (P = 8.75 x 10 −5 ), LOH (P = 0.01) and HRD (P = 3.35 x 10 −4 ) all showed significant associations with BRCA-deficiency. In the cohort of BRCA-deficient vs. BRCA-mutated +HRR-negative, all the scores also highly correlated with BRCA-deficiency (TAI: P = 2.35 x 10 −4 , LST: P = 1.48 x 10 −5 ; LOH: P = 2.36 x 10 −4 , HRD: P = 6.29 x 10 −5 ). Using 42 as a cutoff, it achieved sensitivities of 94.1%, 60% and 82% for identifying BRCA-deficient tumors in the 35 OCs, 36 BCs and in all 73 tumors, respectively. We further validated the predictive value of HRD score in an additional 42 OC pts and found significantly higher HRD sore in pts sensitive to platinum therapy (P = 0.036). Patients having an HRD score 〉 42 had a significantly longer PFS than pts with a score 〈 42 (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study developed a HRD score base on assessing 3 patterns of genomic instability (TAI, LST and LOH). The HRD score revealed a promising value in detecting HR-deficient tumors (especially BRCA-deficient).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 5562-5562
    Abstract: 5562 Background: Niraparib maintenance therapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), but its antitumor activity remains unclear in those with measurable residual disease (MRD) after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1LCT). This study aims to report the efficacy, including antitumor activity, and safety of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with MRD after 1LCT from the phase 3 PRIME trial (NCT03709316). Methods: In PRIME, adults with newly diagnosed aOC who had received cytoreductive surgery and responded to 1LCT were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo with stratification by receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, response to 1LCT, status of germline BRCA mutations, and tumor homologous recombination deficiency status. Tumor assessment was conducted at baseline and every 12 weeks thereafter by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST, version 1.1. Between 29 June 2018 and 11 November 2019, 384 patients were randomized (255 niraparib, 129 placebo). The data cut-off date was 30 September 2021. This post-hoc analysis reports BICR-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and PFS in patients with MRD at baseline. An initial response was confirmed ≥4 weeks later. Results: In total, 73 (19.0%) patients (47 niraparib, 26 placebo) had MRD at baseline. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two MRD groups. Complete and partial responses, both confirmed, were observed in 12 (25.5%) and 15 (31.9%) niraparib-treated patients and 3 (11.5%) and 5 (19.2%) placebo-treated patients, respectively, leading to a confirmed ORR of 57.4% with niraparib and 30.8% with placebo (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–9.11). ORRs by biomarker status are provided in the table. Median PFS (95% CI) was 22.3 (8.7–not estimable) months with niraparib versus 8.3 (5.6–11.0) months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19–0.71). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in 28 (59.6%) niraparib-treated patients and 7 (26.9%) placebo-treated patients. TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in three (6.4%) niraparib-treated patients and one (3.8%) placebo-treated patient. Conclusions: In patients with newly diagnosed aOC who had MRD after 1LCT, niraparib maintenance therapy tended to induce additional antitumor activity and led to a clinically meaningful increase in PFS versus placebo. Clinical trial information: NCT03709316 .[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 382-382
    Abstract: 382 Background: Q-1802 is a humanized bispecific antibody that targets both the tumor -specific antigen CLDN18.2 and the immune checkpoint PD-L1. Q-1802 monotherapy dose-escalation study has been completed in China and dose-expansion study has enrolled 17 advanced subjects with advanced Gastric adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, biliary tract cancer. Methods: This is a FIH, phase 1a/1b, multicenter, open label, single arm, dose escalation and dose expansion study of Q-1802, administered intravenously to 20-30 adult patients with resistant/refractory advanced or metastatic solid tumors who had failed standard therapies (NCT04856150). It aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK/PD profiles and preliminary efficacy of Q-1802 monotherapy. In the dose escalation phase (phase 1a), an accelerated titration followed by a 3+3 design was used to assess the safety and tolerability of Q-1802 (dose range 0.1 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg); and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Q-1802 was administered in a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period followed by a Q2w treatment schedule. In the dose expansion phase (Phase 1b), one to two dose groups will be selected to enroll 9-23 Pts, including 3 negative CLDN18.2 expression and 6 positive CLDN18.2 expression in each group. Q-1802 was administered Q2w on a 14-day treatment cycle. Results: As of September 20, 2022, a total of 29 patients (median age 57.0 y; most patients received ≥3 prior regimens) were enrolled (12 Pts in phase 1a with DLT evaluation and 17 Pts in Phase 1b). The most common tumor types were GI cancers. There were no DLTs up to 20 mg/kg of Q-1802, inclusive. Two dose groups:10mg/kg and 20mg/kg were extended in Phase 1b study. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly grade 1-2 .The most common treatment related adverse events were Gastrointestinal AEs (89.7%, 26/29), including nausea 18/29 (62.1%), vomiting 18/29 (62.1%), abdominal pain 8/29 (27.6%), Gastroesophageal reflux disease 7/29 (24.1%). Grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred 7/29 ( 24.1%), and gastrointestinal disease including nausea, vomiting has a higher percentage of 10.3% (3/29). Only one case has a grade 4 AE, hyponatremia, with a long term use of diuretics history. No death reported due to study related treatment. irAEs happened in 7 subjects, including abnormal thyroid function, fatigue, rash, arthritis. Most of irAEs were grade1-2. Among the 9 GIsubjects in the dose-expansion phase with CLDN18.2 positive expression who had measurable lesions and had received at least one post treatment tumor assessments, 2ptsachieved partial response and 4 achieved stable disease as the best overall response per RECIST1.1. Conclusions: Interim data from the present phase 1 study, demonstrate that Q-1802 has excellent preliminary safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity up to doses of 20 mg/kg. The dose extension is still ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04856150 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 5551-5551
    Abstract: 5551 Background: In PRIME (NCT03709316), niraparib significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death versus placebo (PBO) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] , 0.34–0.60) in Chinese patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer (OC), regardless of biomarker status. As response to chemotherapy is deemed to be associated with prognosis in OC, this subgroup analysis of the PRIME study aims to better understand niraparib treatment effect in pts based on response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1L CT). Methods: This randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled adults with newly diagnosed, stage III or IV OC who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to 1L CT and received primary or interval cytoreductive surgery, irrespective of residual disease status after surgery. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive niraparib or PBO, whose starting doses were individualized based on baseline bodyweight and platelet count, with stratification according to status of germline BRCA mutations (yes or no), tumor homologous recombination status (deficient or proficient), receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes or no), and clinical response to 1L CT (CR or PR). This prespecified exploratory analysis reports progression-free survival (PFS) and HRs based on clinical response to 1L CT. The data cut-off date was 30 September 2021. Results: Of the 384 pts randomized, 315 (82.0%) and 69 (18.0%) had a CR (212 niraparib, 103 PBO) or PR (43 niraparib, 26 PBO) to 1L CT, respectively. Baseline characteristics are presented in the Table. The overall PFS median follow-up was 27.5 months. Niraparib significantly extended PFS compared with PBO: the median PFS was 29.4 months for niraparib versus 8.3 months for PBO (HR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.32–0.61; P 〈 0.001) in the CR group and was 19.3 months for niraparib versus 8.3 months for PBO (HR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.23–0.86; P=0.014) in the PR group. Conclusions: In pts with newly diagnosed advanced OC, PFS was substantially prolonged with niraparib versus PBO, regardless of response to chemotherapy and biomarker status. Moreover, pts who achieved a CR appeared to receive larger PFS benefit from niraparib than those with a PR. Clinical trial information: NCT03709316. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...