GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 26 ( 2022-09-10), p. 3077-3087
    Abstract: Cisplatin is the main systemic treatment modality for male type II germ cell tumors (GCTs). Although generally very effective, 5%-10% of patients suffer from cisplatin-resistant disease. Identification of the driving mechanisms of resistance will enable improved risk stratification and development of alternative treatments. METHODS We developed and characterized cisplatin-resistant GCT cell line models and compared their molecular characteristics with patient samples with cisplatin resistance and/or a poor clinical outcome. Subsequently, the association between the overlapping genetic features and clinical data was assessed. Finally, we used Cox regression to determine the prognostic relevance of these features within the currently used risk classification. RESULTS Gain of chromosome 3p25.3 was detected in all cisplatin-resistant cell lines, and copy number of this region correlated with the level of resistance (R = 0.96, P = 1.5e-04). Gain of this region was detected at low frequencies in primary tumors and at higher frequencies in relapsed and/or cisplatin-resistant tumors. Chromosome 3p25.3 gain was associated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival, with the strongest association observed in nonseminomas excluding pure teratomas. 3p25.3 gain was more frequently observed in tumors with yolk sac tumor histology and predicted adverse outcome independent of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group risk classification and the presence of TP53/ MDM2 alterations. CONCLUSION On the basis of both in vitro analyses and clinical data, we found 3p25.3 to be strongly associated with cisplatin resistance and poor clinical outcome in male type II GCTs. Using genomic profiling, 3p25.3 status could help to improve risk stratification in male patients with type II GCT. Further characterization of this locus and underlying mechanisms of resistance is warranted to guide development of novel treatment approaches for cisplatin-resistant disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 23, No. 4 ( 2005-02-01), p. 732-740
    Abstract: To discover a set of markers predictive for the type of response to endocrine therapy with the antiestrogen tamoxifen using gene expression profiling. Patients and Methods The study was performed on 112 estrogen receptor–positive primary breast carcinomas from patients with advanced disease and clearly defined types of response (ie, 52 patients with objective response v 60 patients with progressive disease) from start of first-line treatment with tamoxifen. Main clinical end points are the effects of therapy on tumor size and time until tumor progression (progression-free survival [PFS]). RNA isolated from tumor samples was amplified and hybridized to 18,000 human cDNA microarrays. Results Using a training set of 46 breast tumors, 81 genes were found to be differentially expressed (P ≤ .05) between tamoxifen-responsive and -resistant tumors. These genes were involved in estrogen action, apoptosis, extracellular matrix formation, and immune response. From the 81 genes, a predictive signature of 44 genes was extracted and validated on an independent set of 66 tumors. This 44-gene signature is significantly superior (odds ratio, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.10 to 9.11; P = .03) to traditional predictive factors in univariate analysis and also significantly related with a longer PFS in univariate (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.94; P = .03) as well as in multivariate analyses (P = .03). Conclusion Our data show that gene expression profiling can be used to discriminate between breast cancer patients with progressive disease and objective response to tamoxifen. Additional studies are needed to confirm if the predictive signature might allow identification of individual patients who could benefit from other (adjuvant) endocrine therapies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 27, No. 4 ( 2009-02-01), p. 542-549
    Abstract: We have previously identified a set of breast cancer antiestrogen resistance (BCAR) genes causing estrogen independence and tamoxifen resistance in vitro using a functional genetic screen. Here, we explored whether these BCAR genes provide predictive value for tamoxifen resistance and prognostic information for tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer patients. Patients and Methods mRNA levels of 10 BCAR genes (AKT1, AKT2, BCAR1, BCAR3, EGFR, ERBB2, GRB7, SRC, TLE3, and TRERF1) were measured in estrogen receptor–positive breast tumors using quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Normalized mRNA levels were evaluated for association with progression-free survival (PFS) in 242 patients receiving tamoxifen as first-line monotherapy for recurrent disease, and with distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) in 413 lymph node-negative (LNN) primary breast cancer patients who did not receive systemic adjuvant therapy. Results Concerning tamoxifen resistance, BCAR3, ERBB2, GRB7, and TLE3 mRNA levels were predictive for PFS, independent of traditional predictive factors. By combining GRB7 (or ERBB2) and TLE3 mRNA levels, patients could be classified in three subgroups with distinct PFS. For the evaluation of tumor aggressiveness, AKT2, EGFR, and TRERF1 mRNA levels were all significantly associated with MFS, independent of traditional prognostic factors. Using the combined AKT2 and EGFR mRNA status, four prognostic groups were identified with different MFS outcomes. Conclusion The majority of BCAR genes, which were revealed to confer tamoxifen resistance and estrogen independence in vitro by functional screening, have clinical relevance, and associate with tamoxifen resistance and/or tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...