GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (67)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Outcomes of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance and tested with clinical cell-cycle risk score.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e16566-e16566
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e16566-e16566
    Abstract: e16566 Background: The indolent nature of many prostate cancers (PC) makes some men eligible to undergo active surveillance (AS) rather than immediate definitive treatment. Accurate risk classification is critical for selection of appropriate candidates for AS. The clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score, a combined clinical and molecular score, provides improved prognostic information about tumor aggressiveness over clinical parameters alone. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of men with low-risk PC by NCCN guidelines and CCR score who selected AS. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed men with localized PC who received CCR testing (2013-2017) and had low-risk disease according to NCCN guidelines and CCR score (N = 664). Low-risk by CCR score was defined as having a risk of disease-specific mortality 〈 3.2%. Men selected AS (no definitive treatment within 6 months of diagnosis) or underwent immediate definitive treatment. Durability of AS was evaluated beginning from diagnosis. Clinical outcomes were determined by reporting adverse events (biochemical recurrence (BCR), progression to metastasis as confirmed by radiographic imaging, prostate cancer specific mortality). Results: In this study, 547 men (82%) selected AS (median follow-up time 2.2 years [1.5, 3.1]). Of those managed by AS, two (0.4%) men experienced an adverse event. One man experienced BCR 3.7 years after diagnosis, and the other experienced metastasis 0.9 years after diagnosis. There were no reported cases of disease-specific mortality. The probability of remaining on AS for 3 years was 69.6%. Common reasons for exiting AS were patient choice (27.1%), increase in Gleason score (23.3%), and change in prostate specific antigen (PSA) (10.5%). Of those patients that left AS due to change in PSA (N = 14), only 4 exhibited a clinically significant increase in PSA ( 〉 10 ng/mL). Conclusions: The majority of men with molecularly-confirmed (CCR), NCCN low-risk PC selected AS in both academic and community settings. The incidence of metastatic disease or BCR after definitive treatment for disease progression was rare. The majority of men who selected AS remained on AS for the duration of the study.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e16566
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Outcomes of Infants and Young Children With Relapsed Medulloblastoma After Initial Craniospinal Irradiation–Sparing Approaches: An International Cohort Study
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 10 ( 2023-04-01), p. 1921-1932
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 10 ( 2023-04-01), p. 1921-1932
    Abstract: Infant and young childhood medulloblastoma (iMB) is usually treated without craniospinal irradiation (CSI) to avoid neurocognitive late effects. Unfortunately, many children relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess salvage strategies and prognostic features of patients with iMB who relapse after CSI-sparing therapy. METHODS We assembled a large international cohort of 380 patients with relapsed iMB, age younger than 6 years, and initially treated without CSI. Univariable and multivariable Cox models of postrelapse survival (PRS) were conducted for those treated with curative intent using propensity score analyses to account for confounding factors. RESULTS The 3-year PRS, for 294 patients treated with curative intent, was 52.4% (95% CI, 46.4 to 58.3) with a median time to relapse from diagnosis of 11 months. Molecular subgrouping was available for 150 patients treated with curative intent, and 3-year PRS for sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 4, and group 3 were 60%, 84%, and 18% ( P = .0187), respectively. In multivariable analysis, localized relapse ( P = .0073), SHH molecular subgroup ( P = .0103), CSI use after relapse ( P = .0161), and age ≥ 36 months at initial diagnosis ( P = .0494) were associated with improved survival. Most patients (73%) received salvage CSI, and although salvage chemotherapy was not significant in multivariable analysis, its use might be beneficial for a subset of children receiving salvage CSI 〈 35 Gy ( P = .007). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of patients with relapsed iMB are salvaged after initial CSI-sparing approaches. Patients with SHH subgroup, localized relapse, older age at initial diagnosis, and those receiving salvage CSI show improved PRS. Future prospective studies should investigate optimal CSI doses and the role of salvage chemotherapy in this population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02968
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Prognostic value of tumor deposits in stage III colon cancer patients, a post-hoc analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 3_suppl ( 2021-01-20), p. 10-10
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 3_suppl ( 2021-01-20), p. 10-10
    Abstract: 10 Background: In colon cancer, tumor deposits (TD) have been associated with worse prognosis, but they are included in the TNM staging system only in the absence of lymph node metastasis (i.e., stage III pN1c tumors). Here we aimed at evaluating the prognostic value of TD and the impact of the addition of TD in the count of lymph node metastases in patients with stage III colon cancer from the CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III trial (NCT01150045). Methods: Pathological reports of all patients were reviewed for the presence and the count of TD, primary tumor sidedness, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion. Cases without available pathological report or without specific information of TD were excluded. Prognostic associations were evaluated by multi-variable Cox models adjusting for treatment arm, T-stage, N-stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and lymph node ratio. Results: Overall, 2028 patients were included, with 524 (26%) TD-positive and 1504 (74%) TD-negative stage III tumors. Of the TD-positive patients, 80 (15.4%) were node negative (i.e., pN1c), 239 (46.1%) were pN1a/b and 200 (38.55%) were pN2. 17.2% and 37.0% of all pN1a/b and pN2 tumors had TD. Overall median follow-up was 69.3 months. The presence of TD was associated with poorer DFS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.59, 95%CI 1.28-1.91) and OS (aHR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.18-1.95) in the overall population. The negative effect of TD on DFS and OS was observed for both pN1a/b and pN2 groups and confirmed in multivariate Cox model. Among TD-positive patients, the number of TD had a linear negative effect on DFS and OS. Adding TD to the count of lymph node metastases, 104 of 1570 (6.6%) patients initially considered as pN1 were re-staged as pN2. Re-staged pN2 patients experienced worse DFS (3-year DFS rate: 65.5% versus 80.3%, P = .0003) and OS (5-year OS rate: 69.1 versus 87.8%, P = .0005) than patients confirmed as pN1. Re-staged pN2 patients had similar DFS than patients initially staged as pN2 (3-year DFS rate: 65.5% versus 63.1%, P = .1992). OS curves of these 2 groups crossed, with better outcomes during the first 3 years of follow-up but poorer 5-year estimates for re-staged pN2 patients (5-year OS rate: 69.1% versus 74.8%, P = .0436). Conclusions: TD are found in more than one fourth of stage III colon cancer specimens. The number of TD has a linear deleterious effect on patients’ prognosis. Adding the number of TD to the count of lymph node metastases improves the prognostication accuracy of the TNM staging. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT01150045.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.10
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Outcomes of Patients With Double-Hit Lymphoma Who Achieve First Complete Remission
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 20 ( 2017-07-10), p. 2260-2267
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 20 ( 2017-07-10), p. 2260-2267
    Abstract: Patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) rarely achieve long-term survival following disease relapse. Some patients with DHL undergo consolidative autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) to reduce the risk of relapse, although the benefit of this treatment strategy is unclear. Methods Patients with DHL who achieved first complete remission following completion of front-line therapy with either rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or intensive front-line therapy, and deemed fit for autoSCT, were included. A landmark analysis was performed, with time zero defined as 3 months after completion of front-line therapy. Patients who experienced relapse before or who were not followed until that time were excluded. Results Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 80% and 87%, respectively, for all patients (n = 159). Three-year RFS and OS rates did not differ significantly for autoSCT (n = 62) versus non-autoSCT patients (n = 97), but 3-year RFS was inferior in patients who received R-CHOP compared with intensive therapy (56% v 88%; P = .002). Three-year RFS and OS did not differ significantly for patients in the R-CHOP or intensive therapy cohorts when analyzed by receipt of autoSCT. The median OS following relapse was 8.6 months. Conclusion In the largest reported series, to our knowledge, of patients with DHL to achieve first complete remission, consolidative autoSCT was not associated with improved 3-year RFS or OS. In addition, patients treated with R-CHOP experienced inferior 3-year RFS compared with those who received intensive front-line therapy. When considered in conjunction with reports of patients with newly diagnosed DHL, which demonstrate lower rates of disease response to R-CHOP compared with intensive front-line therapy, our findings further support the use of intensive front-line therapy for this patient population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.2157
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Treatment Outcomes and Roles of Transplantation and Maintenance Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From Large Real-World Cohorts
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 3 ( 2023-01-20), p. 541-554
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 3 ( 2023-01-20), p. 541-554
    Abstract: Commonly used first-line (1L) treatments for mantle cell lymphoma include high-dose cytarabine-based induction followed by autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) for younger patients and several chemoimmunotherapy regimens for older patients. Continuous debates exist on the role of ASCT in younger patients and maintenance rituximab (MR) after bendamustine plus rituximab (BR). METHODS Retrospective data from 4,216 patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the Flatiron Health electronic record-derived deidentified database diagnosed between 2011 and 2021, mostly in US community oncology settings, were evaluated for treatment patterns and outcomes. The efficacy findings with ASCT and MR were validated in an independent cohort of 1,168 patients from 12 academic centers. RESULTS Among 3,614 patients with documented 1L treatment, BR was the most used. Among 1,265 patients age 〈 65 years, 30.5% received cytarabine-based induction and 23.5% received ASCT. There was no significant association between ASCT and real-world time to next treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.03; P = .10) or overall survival (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P = .4) among ASCT-eligible patients. Among MR-eligible patients, MR after BR versus BR alone was associated with a longer real-world time to next treatment (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.38; P 〈 .001) and overall survival (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.92; P 〈 .001). The efficacy findings were consistent in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION In this large cohort of patients treated primarily in the US community setting, only one in four young patients received cytarabine or ASCT consolidation, suggesting the need to develop treatments that can be delivered effectively in routine clinical practice. Together with the validation cohort, data support future clinical trials exploring regimens without ASCT consolidation in young patients, whereas MR should be considered for patients after 1L BR and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02698
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Combination Dabrafenib and Trametinib Versus Combination Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Patients With Advanced BRAF -Mutant Melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA6134
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 2 ( 2023-01-10), p. 186-197
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 2 ( 2023-01-10), p. 186-197
    Abstract: Combination programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4–blockade and dual BRAF/MEK inhibition have each shown significant clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exist to guide the choice of either initial therapy or treatment sequence in this population. This study was conducted to determine which initial treatment or treatment sequence produced the best efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a phase III trial, patients with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm A) or dabrafenib/trametinib (arm B) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, dabrafenib/trametinib (arm C) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm D). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were 3-year OS, objective response rate, response duration, progression-free survival, crossover feasibility, and safety. RESULTS A total of 265 patients were enrolled, with 73 going onto step 2 (27 in arm C and 46 in arm D). The study was stopped early by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of a clinically significant end point being achieved. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1) and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4; log-rank P = .010). Step 1 progression-free survival favored arm A ( P = .054). Objective response rates were arm A: 46.0%; arm B: 43.0%; arm C: 47.8%; and arm D: 29.6%. Median duration of response was not reached for arm A and 12.7 months for arm B ( P 〈 .001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients with documented disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred with similar frequency between arms, and regimen toxicity profiles were as anticipated. CONCLUSION Combination nivolumab/ipilimumab followed by BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy, if necessary, should be the preferred treatment sequence for a large majority of patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01763
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Basket study of the oral progesterone antagonist onapristone ER in women with progesterone receptor positive (PR+) recurrent granulosa cell tumor (GCT), low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS6098-TPS6098
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS6098-TPS6098
    Abstract: TPS6098 Background: Onapristone extended release (ER) is a type I full progesterone antagonist that inhibits progesterone mediated PR activation and stabilizes PR association with corepressors. Onapristone has shown activity across multiple preclinical models of hormonally driven cancer. A phase I dose escalation study of onapristone ER in PR+ breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer patients found all doses tested to be well tolerated, with 50mg PO BID determined to be the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). GCT (98% of cases PR+), LGSOC (58% of cases PR+) and EEC (67% of cases PR+) are hormonally driven cancers which generally have poor responses to chemotherapy and limited treatment options in the recurrent setting. Methods: This is an open-label, investigator-initiated basket study of onapristone ER in patients with PR+ recurrent GCT, LGSOC, or EEC currently enrolling patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in NY, USA (NCT03909152). The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria, within 36 weeks of treatment. Eligible patients must have received at least 1 prior line of chemotherapy, have measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and have tumor tissue collected within 3 years prior to enrollment with PR expression ≥ 1% by IHC. Patients are allowed to have unlimited additional prior lines of chemotherapy, biologic therapy, immunotherapy or hormonal therapy. Enrolled patients are treated with onapristone ER 50mg PO BID until time of progression or intolerable toxicity. The 3 disease cohorts are currently enrolling to Stage I in parallel with expansion from stage I to stage II planned when the prespecified response criteria are met for each cohort as described in the table below. Clinical trial information: NCT03909152. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.TPS6098
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A phase ib trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of quinacrine plus capecitabine in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e15020-e15020
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e15020-e15020
    Abstract: e15020 Background: Acridines emerged from a cell-based screen for p53-pathway restoring compounds. Quinacrine, an acridine demonstrating p53 pathway restoration properties, displayed preclinical anti-tumor effects when used as monotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell culture and in vivo xenografts. Quinacrine suppresses survival pathways by inhibiting Mcl-1 expression, NFkB, STAT3, and angiogenesis. The combination of quinacrine plus 5-FU showed in-vivo preclinical efficacy against CRC with mutant KRAS, BRAF, or p53. Capecitabine, an oral 5-FU prodrug, is FDA-approved to treat metastatic (m)CRC. This phase I trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of quinacrine plus capecitabine in patients with refractory mCRC. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed mCRC refractory to standard therapy or with no standard therapy options available were eligible for the study. Using a modified 4B Simon’s accelerated titration design, patients were treated with a fixed dose of capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily (bid) for 14 days of a 21-day cycle, and escalating doses of quinacrine 100 mg daily, 100 mg bid, and 200 mg bid for 21 days. The primary endpoint was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of quinacrine in combination with capecitabine and to determine their tolerability and safety. Results: Ten patients were enrolled, median age 60-years old (range: 56-79). Quinacrine 100 mg daily and 100 mg bid were well tolerated by the first two patients. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were seen in 3 patients treated with quinacrine 200 mg bid and included hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, increased alkaline phosphatase, hypokalemia, diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were seen. 5 additional patients tolerated treatment with quinacrine 100 mg bid and capecitabine without further DLTs making this the MTD. The median time on treatment was 63 days. Three patients came off study prior to their first response evaluation. In 7 patients evaluable for response, 4 had stable disease (57%), while 3 (43%) had disease progression. Median overall survival was 196.5 days. Conclusions: Capecitabine and quinacrine can be safely administered at the MTD of capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 PO bid D1-14 and quinacrine 100 mg PO bid D1-21 of a 21-day cycle for patients with mCRC. A phase II study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01844076.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e15020
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    United States Intergroup E1609: A phase III randomized study of adjuvant ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) versus high-dose interferon-α2b for resected high-risk melanoma.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 9504-9504
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 9504-9504
    Abstract: 9504 Background: Phase III adjuvant trials reported significant benefits in relapse-free survival (RFS) for 6 FDA-approved regimens and overall survival (OS) for HDI and ipi10 versus observation or placebo. E1609 evaluated the relative safety and efficacy of ipi at 3 and 10 mg/kg compared to HDI, which was the adjuvant standard until recently. Methods: E1609 had 2 co-primary endpoints: OS and RFS; considered positive if either co-primary endpoint comparison was positive. Activated on 5/25/2011 and completed accrual 8/15/2014. A 2-step hierarchical approach evaluated ipi3 vs HDI followed by ipi10 vs HDI. Patients were stratified by AJCC7 stage (IIIB, IIIC, M1a, M1b). Based on protocol criteria, the primary evaluation was conducted using a data cutoff of 2/15/2019. Results: Final adult patient accrual was 1670; 523 randomized to ipi3, 636 to HDI and 511 to ipi10. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) Grade 3 or higher were experienced by 37% pts with ipi3, 79% with HDI and 58% with ipi10, and those of any grade leading to treatment discontinuation were 35% with ipi3, 20% HDI and 54% ipi10. AEs were mostly immune related and consistent with the known toxicity profiles of these agents. Gr5 AEs considered at least possibly related were 3 with ipi3, 2 with HDI and 8 with ipi10. First step comparison of OS and RFS of ipi3 vs. HDI utilized an ITT analysis of concurrently randomized cases (N = 1051) and showed significant OS difference in favor of ipi3; HR 0.78, 95.6% RCI (.61, 1.00); p = 0.044. The prespecified efficacy boundary was crossed. For RFS, HR 0.85, 99.4% CI (.66, 1.09), p = 0.065. In the 2 nd step comparison of ipi10 vs. HDI (N = 989), there were trends towards improvement in OS [HR 0.88, 95.6% CI (.69, 1.12)] and RFS [HR 0.84, 99.4% CI (.65, 1.09)] in favor of ipi10 that were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy with ipi3 benefits survival of resected high-risk melanoma pts; for the first time in the history of melanoma adjuvant therapy, E1609 has demonstrated a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of OS against an active control regimen previously shown to have OS and RFS benefits, supporting early systemic adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01274338.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9504
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data on Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients Compared With Younger Patients Who Participated in US National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Studies
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 25 ( 2017-09-01), p. 2885-2892
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 25 ( 2017-09-01), p. 2885-2892
    Abstract: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for patients with stage III non–small-cell lung cancer. Elderly patients may experience increased rates of adverse events (AEs) or less benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods Individual patient data were collected from 16 phase II or III trials conducted by US National Cancer Institute–supported cooperative groups of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone or with consolidation or induction chemotherapy for stage III non–small-cell lung cancer from 1990 to 2012. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and AEs were compared between patients age ≥ 70 (elderly) and those younger than 70 years (younger). Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for survival time and CIs were estimated by single-predictor and multivariable frailty Cox models. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (ORs) for AEs and CIs were obtained from single-predictor and multivariable generalized linear mixed-effect models. Results A total of 2,768 patients were classified as younger and 832 as elderly. In unadjusted and multivariable models, elderly patients had worse OS (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.31 and HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.29, respectively). In unadjusted and multivariable models, elderly and younger patients had similar progression-free survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.10 and HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09, respectively). Elderly patients had a higher rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs in unadjusted and multivariable models (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.70 and OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.74, respectively). Grade 5 AEs were significantly higher in elderly compared with younger patients (9% v 4%; P 〈 .01). Fewer elderly compared with younger patients completed treatment (47% v 57%; P 〈 .01), and more discontinued treatment because of AEs (20% v 13%; P 〈 .01), died during treatment (7.8% v 2.9%; P 〈 .01), and refused further treatment (5.8% v 3.9%; P = .02). Conclusion Elderly patients in concurrent chemoradiotherapy trials experienced worse OS, more toxicity, and had a higher rate of death during treatment than younger patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4758
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...