GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 4100-4100
    Abstract: 4100 Background: NabP+GEM chemotherapy improves survival compared with GEM monotherapy as treatment for mPDAC. A PDAC mouse model suggested that nabP potentiates GEM activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels and scheduling may be critical to optimise clinical benefit. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomised to receive standard concomitant (CON) nabP+GEM or sequential (SEQ) administration, with nabP given 24 hours before GEM. After 6 cycles, pts benefiting from treatment could continue the same regimen until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Serial blood and baseline tumour samples were collected for exploratory biomarkers. Results: Between March 2014 and 2016, 146 pts (71 SEQ, 75 CON) were recruited. Median age (range) was 66 (45-82) years; Karnofsky performance status was 70 (in 12% pts), 80 (27%), 90 (38%) or 100 (24%); 47% had pancreatic head primaries; 84% had liver metastases. Median no. cycles received was 4 SEQ, 3 CON; 51 pts (35%) received ≥6 cycles of treatment (42% SEQ, 28% CON). A 24+2hr interval was achieved in 〉 90% SEQ admin. Grade ≥3 adverse events experienced by ≥10% pts (SEQ, CON) were neutropaenia (54%, 30%; p = 0.003), febrile neutropaenia (12%, 12%), fatigue (22%, 15%), vomiting (7%, 11%) and anaemia (10%, 5%). G-CSF was administered at local investigator's discretion to 35 pts (23 SEQ, 12 CON; p = 0.015). To date, 112 pts have died. 6 month (m) PFS by SEQ and CON arms were 47% and 33%; median PFS were 5.8 and 4.0m; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46-0.95; 12m OS by SEQ and CON arms were 29% and 26%; median OS were 10.1 and 7.9m; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.61-1.29. ORR was 50% SEQ and 33% CON (p = 0.065). Mean baseline QoL Global health status score was 60.6 SEQ and 63.4 CON. The mean change in QoL score from baseline at 24 weeks was -2.1 SEQ and -12.1 CON. Conclusions: Sequential delivery of nabP combined with GEM trended towards improving all clinically relevant efficacy end points: PFS, OS, and ORR. Translational correlates will be reported in due course. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN71070888.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 4_suppl ( 2017-02-01), p. 342-342
    Abstract: 342 Background: NabP+GEM chemotherapy improves survival compared with standard GEM monotherapy as treatment for advanced PDAC. A PDAC mouse model showed that delivery of nabP prior to GEM generated a higher intratumoural dFdC:dFdU ratio, which correlated with improved outcome. Therefore, scheduling may be critical to optimise clinical benefit. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive nabP+GEM, either concomitantly (CON) or sequentially (SEQ), 24 hours apart. After 6 cycles, patients benefiting from treatment could continue the same regimen until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by 8-weekly CT scanning; secondary endpoints included safety, response rate, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Results: Between March 2014 and 2016, 146 patients (71 SEQ, 75 CON) from 19 UK sites were randomly assigned. Median age (range) was 66 (45-82) years; Karnofsky performance status was 70 (in 12% of patients), 80 (27%), 90 (38%) or 100 (24%); 47% of primary tumours were situated in the pancreatic head; 84% had liver metastases. Median number of cycles was 4 SEQ, 3 CON; 50 patients (34%) received ≥ 6 cycles of treatment (41% SEQ, 28% CON). A 24+2hr interval was achieved in over 90% SEQ administrations. Most patients stopped treatment prior to 6 cycles due to disease progression/death (42%) or toxicity (41%). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events experienced by ≥ 10% patients (SEQ, CON) were neutropaenia (54%, 30%), febrile neutropaenia (12%, 12%), fatigue (22%, 16%), vomiting (7%, 11%) and anaemia (10%, 5%). G-CSF was administered to 35 patients (23 SEQ, 12 CON). To date, 109 patients have died. 6-month PFS by SEQ and CON arms was 46.7% and 33.8%; median PFS was 5.8 and 4.3 months. 12-month OS by SEQ and CON arms was 29.1% and 20.1%; median OS was 10.1 and 7.9 months. The objective response rate was 44% SEQ and 30% CON. Mean baseline QoL Global health status was 60.6 SEQ and 63.4 CON. The change from baseline (mean) at 24 weeks was -2.1 SEQ and -12.1 CON. Conclusions: Sequential delivery of nabP and GEM improves progression-free and overall survival. Although more myelosuppressive, QoL was maintained. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN71070888.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...