GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (1)
  • Medicine  (1)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (1)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (1)
RVK
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 7071-7071
    Abstract: 7071 Background: Although anatomic segmentectomy is considered a “compromised” procedure by many surgeons, new information from several retrospective, single-institution series has countered negative premises regarding tumor recurrence and patient survival. The primary objective of this study was to utilize propensity score matching to compare outcomes following these anatomic resection approaches for stage I NSCLC. Methods: Patients undergoing lobectomy (n=392) vs. segmentectomy (n=793) for clinical stage I NSCLC were matched 1:1 using a propensity score that accounted for the potential confounding effects of pre-operative patient variables. Matching based on propensity scores produced 312 patients in each group. Primary outcome variables included recurrence-free and overall survival. Factors affecting survival were assessed by proportional hazards (Cox) regression and Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates. Results: Peri-operative mortality was 1.2% in the segmentectomy group and 2.5% in the lobectomy group (p=0.38). Ninety-day mortality was 2.6% and 4.8% (p=0.20), respectively. At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, no differences were noted in locoregional (5.5% vs. 5.1%, p=1.00), distant (14.8% vs. 11.6%, p=0.29) or overall recurrence rates (20.2% vs. 16.7%, p=0.30) when comparing segmentectomy with lobectomy. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted in time to recurrence (p=0.415) or overall survival (p=0.258) when comparing the matched groups. Five year freedom from recurrence (95% CI) was: Segment 0.70 [95% CI: (0.63, 0.78) vs. Lobe 0.71 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.78]. Overall survival (95% CI) was: Segment 0.54 [95% CI: (0.47, 0.51) vs. Lobe 0.60 [95% CI: 0.54, 0.67] . Segmentectomy was not found to be an independent predictor of recurrence (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.40) or overall survival (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.89.1.52). Conclusions: In this large propensity-matched comparison, anatomic segmentectomy is associated with similar time to recurrence and overall survival rates when compared to lobectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC. These results will need further validation by prospective, randomized trials (CALGB 140503).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...