GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (9)
Material
Publisher
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (9)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2018
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P3-01-11-P3-01-11
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P3-01-11-P3-01-11
    Abstract: Background SPIO has a similar detection ratio as Technetium99 and Patent Blue to identify sentinel nodes (SN). No allergic reactions have been observed and no nuclear medicine facilities are needed, making logistics easier. At the Academic Hospital in Uppsala, Sweden, SPIO has been used routinely for three years. After breast conserving surgery (BCS) many women developed a brownish discoloration at the injection site. The discoloration stays for a long time. To study the patient-experienced cosmetic discomfort and the natural history of the discoloration we followed our first 153 BCS women for more than two years. After modifying the technique of injection we registered the discoloration in the following 115 women. Methods All women injected with a retro-areolar injection of SPIO between April 2015 and October 2016 were included. The women were telephone interviewed every third month. The size of the discoloration was self-assessed and the cosmetic discomfort was classified by a scale from 0 (no discomfort) to 5 points (very discomforting). Photos were taken in selected cases after 1-2 years. Between November 2016 and April 2017, a deeper, para-tumoral injection was used and discoloration was noted 3 weeks after surgery. Results Ninety of 153 women (58.8%) developed a discoloration after a retro-areolar injection. The mean size was 26.1cm2 (2-100cm2). The discoloration had vanished in 6.8% and 11.4% of the women after 1 and 2 years, respectively. The mean size of the discolorations was 18.2cm2 (1-66cm2) and 13.6cm2 (1-66cm2) after 1 and 2 years. The intensity of the color was continuously fading. The cosmetic discomfort was assessed as 2.2 points after 1 year and 1.0 after 2 years. Of 115 women with a deeper injection, 32.2% developed a discoloration with a mean size of 13.1cm2 (1-36cm2), three weeks after surgery. The incidence and size of the discolorations were statistically significantly less and smaller after a deeper injection (p & lt;0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). SNs were identified in 91% of women with a retro-areolar injection and in 93% of those with a deeper injection. Conclusions After an injection of SPIO, a discoloration might develop and the discoloration can stay for more than 2 years in many women. However, the color fades and the size diminish continuously and the women do not consider the discoloration a major cosmetic problem. A deeper injection reduces the incidence and the size of the discoloration with a similar detection ratio of SN. In our next study, we aim to reduce the volume of SPIO and thereby hopefully reduce the discoloration. Patient-assessed cosmetic discomfort after 1 and 2 yearsPatient age1 year2 years & lt;55 years3.10.9≥55 years1.91.00=no discomfort, 5=very discomforting Citation Format: Wärnberg M, Karakatsanis A, Abdsaleh S, Wärnberg F. Discoloration after injection of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) for sentinel node biopsy. A long term qualitative follow-up study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-11.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2019
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. P3-03-12-P3-03-12
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. P3-03-12-P3-03-12
    Abstract: Background Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) is a novel tracer for axillary mapping in breast cancer with comparable performance to the dual standard of isotope and blue dye. The earlier SPIO (Sienna+®) required 2 ml of SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl and was injected retro-areolarly. This was considered to be associated with the discoloration observed in 40% of breast conservation cases. Subsequently, a new form was developed (SiennaXPTM) in a volume of 2 ml without dilution. The aim of the ongoing SentiDose study is to compare smaller doses of SiennaXPTM injected in different time-frames (1.5 ml periareolarly on the operation day vs 1 ml peritumourally 1-7 days preoperatively) and compare it to the performance of the original SPIO (Sienna+®). A background mapping with isotope and blue dye was performed for assessment of concordance. Method In all, 330 patients will be recruited from six sites in Sweden, divided in two isonumerical cohorts injected as described above. Results from the 1.5 ml cohort are presented and compared on a patient-level analysis to the SentiMag Nordic trial that used Sienna+®, on a 2-sided non-inferiority margin of 5%. Study endpoints are detection rate per patient, number of sentinel nodes (SN) retrieved and discoloration at 3 weeks postoperatively. Results Detection rate for SiennaXPTM, 1.5 ml, was comparable with Sienna+® (96.9 vs 97.6%, p=0.76), even in multivariate analysis adjusting for age and metastasis rate (Exp(B)=0.68; 95% CI; 0.18-2.60, p=0.58). with a high concordance between isotope and SiennaXPTM. The number of SNs were similar (1.91 vs. 1.83, p=0.08) for Sienna+® and SiennaXPTM. Discoloration rate was lower for SiennaXPTM compared to Sienna+® (14.3% vs. 38.2%, p & lt;0.001) after breast conserving surgery. Furthermore, two patients were excluded in the SentiDose cohort due to protocol violation. Demographics and outcomes are illustrated in Table 1 Nordic SentiMag Trial (n=206)SentiDose 1.5ml Cohort (n=163)p-valueAge (yrs)61.864.30.03BMI (kg/m2)26.927.20.84Size (mm)19.220.00.64Type of Surgery (BCS/Mx)154 (74.8%) / 52 (25.2%)130 (79.8%) / 33 (20.2%)0.26SPIO Detection Rate (per patient)97.6%96.9%0.76SPIO-Tc Concordance97.5%97.5%0.42Mean SPIO detected SN1,831,910.08Metastasis Rate26.2%16.0%0.01SPIO nodal rate in malignancy91.2%81.6%0.21Discoloration in BCS38.2%14.3% & lt;0.001 Conclusion The periareolar injection of 1.5 ml SiennaXPTM on the day of the operation provides comparable detection rates with much less skin discoloration, providing effectivity and flexibility. The completion of the SentiDose study will allow for more definitive results on the dose, timeframe and injection site of SPIO. Citation Format: Hersi A-F, Obondo C, Pistioli L, Abdsaleh S, Nilsson F, Mohammed I, Eriksson S, Wärnberg F, Karakatsanis A. SentiDose interim analysis. A dose optimizing study with a super paramagnetic iron oxide for sentinel node detection [abstract]. In: Proceed ings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-12.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. GS5-08-GS5-08
    Abstract: Background: Women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and their physicians need tools that assess individualized risk and predict treatment benefit. A DCIS biologic signature was previously validated in an observational study at Kaiser Permanente NW. We evaluated the results of the signature for predictive utility in a national randomized clinical trial (SweDCIS) by assessing the 10-year benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on ipsilateral breast event (IBE) and invasive breast cancer (IBC) risks. Methods: The signature was validated in a prospective-retrospective study in women from the SweDCIS trial (n=1046) performed by the Swedish Breast Cancer Group. Women were treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) between 1987-1999 and randomized to RT or no RT. A central pathology review of paraffin embedded tissue blocks (n=873) was performed at Uppsala University (UU). Freshly cut slides were provided to PreludeDx for biomarker testing. Extended follow-up of SweDCIS was published in 2014. A panel of biomarkers (HER2, PR, Ki67, COX2, p16/INK4A, FOXA1 and SIAH2) were assayed and scored in PreludeDx's CLIA lab by board-certified pathologists. Continuous Decision Scores (DS) were calculated with the biologic signature using the biomarker and clinical factors (age, size, margin, and palpability) blinded to patient outcome. The DS results were provided to the Uppsala Regional Cancer Center for analysis. A predefined and co-developed statistical analysis plan was executed. Absolute 10-year RT benefit was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis and the interaction of the DS and RT benefit was assessed. Results: Complete biomarker and clinical information was available in 584 women. In women with clear margins (n=506), 78 IBEs, including 31 IBCs, were recorded within 10 years of diagnosis. The multivariate analysis of DS (0-10 unit scale) and the RT interaction was significant for risk of IBC (p=0.048) and IBE (p & lt;0.001) at 10 years. The DS defined an elevated risk group ( & gt;3) for which there was pronounced 10-year benefit of RT (p=0.01) with an absolute risk reduction of 9% for IBC (Table 1). The corresponding low risk group (≤3), which included 48% of all patients, demonstrated no significant RT benefit (p=0.70) with an absolute risk reduction of 1%. The continuous DS variable was correlated with IBE risk, HR 1.49/per 5 units 95%CI[1.02,2.18] (p=0.038), in addition to the RT benefit for IBE in low (p=0.04) and elevated (p & lt;0.001) risk groups. Table 1. 10-year RT benefit in women from the SweDCIS trial.DS Risk GroupsIBC eventsIn Situ or IBC eventsnAbsolute RT-benefitHR [95%CI] Absolute RT-benefit HR [95%CI] Low Risk Group (DS≤3)2431%0.83 [0.32, 2.16]9%0.48 [0.24-0.97] Elevated Risk Group (DS & gt;3)2639%0.24 [0.08, 0.73]17%0.31 [0.17-0.59] Discussion: Evaluation of the SweDCIS trial validated prognostic and RT predictive utility of the biologic signature. Women diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS±RT were stratified into clinically relevant low and elevated risk groups (≤3 vs & gt;3). Women in the elevated risk group had twice the treatment benefit for IBC from RT compared to prior randomized trials, while the low risk group had no benefit from RT. Citation Format: Wärnberg F, Garmo H, Folkvaljon Y, Holmberg L, Karlsson P, Sandelin K, Linke S, Lyle S, Simin K, Leesman G, Barry T, Savala J, Whitworth P, Bremer T. A validation of DCIS biological risk profile in a randomised study for radiation therapy with 20 year follow-up (SweDCIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2016
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 76, No. 4_Supplement ( 2016-02-15), p. P5-17-02-P5-17-02
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 4_Supplement ( 2016-02-15), p. P5-17-02-P5-17-02
    Abstract: The increasing incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been attributed to the wide adoption of mammography screening programmes. The aim of the present study was to analyse trends in incidence, treatment and outcome of DCIS over a 20-year time period in a Swedish health care region, with a source population of two million, based on systemically collected data in a regional Breast Cancer Quality Registry started in 1992. All patients registered with a diagnosis of primary DCIS in the Breast Cancer Quality Registry in the Uppsala-Örebro healthcare region between 1992 and 2012 were included. The study period was divided into four time periods. The registry contains information on tumour characteristics, treatment and follow-up data and is linked to the Swedish cancer registry, to which reporting of all newly diagnosed malignant tumours in Sweden is mandated. To verify the validity of the Breast Cancer Quality Registry, 300 women recorded with a diagnosis of DCIS were randomly selected and their medical records were collected to compare clinical data, treatment data and subsequent breast cancer events compared to registry data. The completeness and reliability of the registration of most key variables were overall good, 91-99%. A total of 2,952 patients with DCIS were registered, of which eight were men. The proportion of DCIS to all diagnosed breast cancers was 9.5%, with no clear increase over time. The majority of the DCIS cases were detected by screening (68%). Tumour size increased over time; in 1992-1997 36.4% were larger than 15mm compared to 64.8% in 2008-2012. The frequency of mastectomy increased from 23.0% to 39.0% and the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery increased from 30.1% to 67.6%. Axillary lymph node clearance declined over time while the proportion of patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy increased from 1.4% in 1998-2002 to 33.9% in 2003-2007 and 54.9% in 2008-2012.  1992-19971998-20022003-20072008-2012P valueCases693628835796 DCIS size & gt; 15mm252(36.4%)257(40.9%)339(53.8%)511(64.2%) & lt;0.0001Mastectomy161(23.2%)150(23.9%)323(38.7%)313(39.3%) & lt;0.0001BCS519(74.9%)468(74.5%)506(60.6%)476(59.8%) & lt;0.0001BCS+RT156/519(30.0%)178/468(38.0%)347/506(68.6%)322/476(67.6%) & lt;0.0001BCS= Breast conserving surgery, RT= radiotherapy There was no statistical difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrent breast events over time or between different treatment modalities. The relative 5- and 10- year survival rates were 99.0% and 97.0% respectively with no clear trend over time. In conclusion, while the proportion of DCIS did not increase over time between 1992 and 2012, there was a trend towards more intensified management to achieve local control. The increased tumor size over time could be secondary to a higher diagnostic activity, which clearly is manifested by the increased use of sentinel node biopsy. Citation Format: Wadsten C, Heyman H, Holmqvist M, Ahlgren J, Lambe M, Sund M, Wärnberg F. Treatment and prognosis of DCIS during twenty years. A population-based register study from a Swedish cohort. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-17-02.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 4_Supplement ( 2017-02-15), p. P2-01-19-P2-01-19
    Abstract: Background The risk for node metastasis in preoperative diagnosis of DCIS is low. ASCO guidelines suggest that SNB could be performed when mastectomy is planned or in those cases where the probability of upgrading to invasive cancer postoperatively is high. Despite that, SNB is performed almost in 54% of DCIS procedures in the Uppsala-Örebro Region. Thus, morbidity and resources have to be balanced against the risk of a reoperation. Methods Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS grade 3, grade 2 ≥20mm or planned for a mastectomy will be included. Sienna+ is injected in the breast at the first operation. If the specimen contains invasive cancer, a SNB is performed in another session. Sienna+ can be detected in the axilla at least four weeks after the injection. Endpoints of the trial are the feasibility of detection of the SN as well as how many SNBs are avoided. Results In the first 34 cases, six had invasive breast cancer. On reoperation (median 29 days, iqr 10) SNB was successful in four cases with SPIO, one with Tc99 and three cases with blue dye. Totally, the combination of SPIO and blue dye was successful in all cases. No metastases were found. Patient characteristics Total cohort (N=34)Group with IBC (n=6)Age (yrs)58.6 (54.9, 62.9)60.2 (47.4, 72.9)Size (mm)40.0 (31.2, 62.9)57.7 (27.2, 88.1)DCIS grade29 (26.5%)2 (33.3%) 323 (67.6%)4 (66.7%) na2 (5.9%)0PalpableYes30 (88.2%)1 (16.7%) No4 (11.8%)5 (83.3%)BCSYes22 (64.7%)3 (50%) No12 (35.3%)3 (50%)Transcutaneous counts at the end of the operation266 (196,336)300 (126,474) Conclusion It is possible to load the SN with SPIO and reoperate within 4 weeks from the first operation. A rough 83,4% of all patients with DCIS who would have undergone SNB avoided it. Our preliminary results show that 5,6 SNB was avoided for each patient that was operated. SN was detected in all cases with a combination of SPIO and blue dye, but only in 66,7% SPIO. It seems that increased experience with SPIO will increase the effectivity of this procedure. Citation Format: Karakatsanis A, Olofsson HM, Eriksson S, Andersson Y, Bergkvist LÅ, Mohammed I, Sundqvist M, Abdsaleh S, Olofsson Bagge R, Sund M, Wärnberg F. SentiNot: A way to avoid sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-19.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2017
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 77, No. 4_Supplement ( 2017-02-15), p. P3-17-03-P3-17-03
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 4_Supplement ( 2017-02-15), p. P3-17-03-P3-17-03
    Abstract: Introduction The risk of breast cancer death after a primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is less than 2 % after 10 years. Whereas in situ recurrences do not influence survival, a 17-fold elevated risk of breast cancer specific mortality has been shown for invasive recurrences. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) effectively reduces recurrences after breast conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS, but no studies have been able to demonstrate a survival benefit from adjuvant RT treatment or from choosing mastectomy instead of BCS. Here patient and tumour related risk factors for breast cancer death in women with a pure primary DCIS were studied. Patients and methods Women registered with a primary DCIS, between 1992-2012 in three of Sweden´s health care regions with a population of approximately 5.2 million, were enrolled in a nested case-control study. Out of 6,964 women with DCIS, 96 patients who later died from breast cancer were identified. Four controls per case (n=318) were randomly selected by incidence density sampling. We retrieved medical records and pathology reports and calculated OR with 95% CIs for various variables using conditional logistic regression. Results Of the 96 cases, 10 patients developed distant metastasis without a known local recurrence. In 56 patients death was preceded by an invasive ipsilateral recurrence and in 3 patients by a recurrent ipsilateral DCIS. Seven patients had invasive breast events in both the ipsilateral and the contralateral breast. Seventeen patients had contralateral invasive breast cancer and 3 patients contralateral DCIS. Multifocality and tumour size over 25mm (OR 2.6 (1.6 to 4.2)), positive or uncertain margin status (OR 2.8 (1.6 to 4.9)) and detection outside screening (OR 2.1 (1.2 to 3.9)) increased the risk of breast cancer death in univariate analysis, when adjusted for age and year of diagnosis. Suspicion of micro-invasion and nuclear grade 3 was associated with a nonsignificant increased risk, OR 1.8 (0.6 to 5.0) and 2.6 (0.9-6.5), respectively. The risk was not affected by age or treatment. Tumour size and margin status remained significant in the multivariable analysis, when adjusted for treatment and for contralateral breast cancer (OR 2.0 (1.2 to 3.7)). Conclusion In the present study, large tumours and positive or uncertain margin status were significant risk factors for later breast cancer death after a primary DCIS. More extensive treatment was not related to a lower risk. The significance of tumour biology and nuclear grade will be further examined and evaluated. Citation Format: Wadsten C, Garmo H, Fredriksson I, Sund M, Wärnberg F. DCIS and the risk of breast cancer death - A case control study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-17-03.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2019
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. P3-12-01-P3-12-01
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. P3-12-01-P3-12-01
    Abstract: Background:Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) substantially reduces BC mortality and loco-regional recurrences, but incidental radiation exposure to the heart is associated with ischemic heart disease (IHD). We examined the incidence of IHD in a large population-based cohort of women with BC. Patients and methods: The Breast Cancer DataBase Sweden (BCBase) cohort includes all women diagnosed with BC in three of Sweden's six health care regions from 1992-2012 with five age-matched controls without a history of BC for each BC case. A total of 60217 women with BC were included in the BC cohort, and 300791 women without BC in the comparison cohort. Through linkage with a number of population-based registries, information concerning comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and incidence of IHD was obtained. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to estimate risk of IHD for women with BC compared to the comparison cohort, and for women with left-sided BC compared to right-sided BC. The analyses were adjusted for previous IHD, comorbidity, and socioeconomic status. The BC cohort was stratified by RT, endocrine therapy, and chemotherapy. Results: The median follow-up time was 8.1 years. The risk of IHD was significantly lower for the BC cohort compared to the comparison cohort, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.95). The HR's for IHD was even lower in women with BC selected for adjuvant treatment with RT, endocrine therapy or chemotherapy. When women with left-sided BC were compared to right-sided BC an increased HR for IHD of 1.09 (95% CI 1.01-1.17) was seen for the whole cohort, and of 1.18 (95% CI 1.06-1.31) in women receiving RT. When RT was stratified for pathological nodal involvement, a HR of 1.22 (95% CI 0.98-1.51) for women with 1 to 3 pathological lymph nodes was seen, and of 1.72 (95% CI 1.19-2.48) for women with more than 4 pathological lymph nodes, probably reflecting more extensive RT. When RT was combined with other adjuvant treatments, a HR for IHD of 1.24 (95% CI 1.09-1.42) was seen for endocrine therapy, of 1.28 (95% CI 0.98-1.67) for chemotherapy, and of 1.35 (95% CI 0.95-1.92) for endocrine therapy and chemotherapy combined in left-sided BC compared to right-sided BC, suggesting an additive effect to RT on the risk of IHD. Conclusion: The results show a persisting increase in risk of IHD in left-sided RT with contemporary radiation techniques and radiation targets. The increase in risk of IHD in women with left-sided RT seen when endocrine therapy and chemotherapy were added to RT suggests an additive effect on the risk of radiation-induced IHD. Long-term side effects of adjuvant treatment have to be taken into consideration in RT planning to ensure health and quality of life for BC survivors. The results are an incentive to conduct further research concerning dose constraints to the coronary arteries, and of implementation of RT techniques that can lower cardiac radiation doses. Selection of patients to active treatment, and a healthier lifestyle in BC survivors may explain the findings of lower risk of IHD in the BC cohort compared to the comparison cohort. Citation Format: Wennstig A-K, Wadsten C, Garmo H, Wärnberg F, Holmberg L, Blomqvist C, Nilsson G, Sund M. Risk of ischemic heart disease after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2019
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. P2-08-57-P2-08-57
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. P2-08-57-P2-08-57
    Abstract: Background Outcomes for women with early breast cancer have continually improved. A biologic signature to identify those patients that have elevated ipsilateral breast event (IBE) risk after breast conserving surgery (BCS) treated with or without radiation therapy (RT) is needed. More aggressive systemic or surgical options may be warranted for patients with elevated risk while BCS alone may be an option for very low risk patients. We report early results for a biologic signature interrogating critical pathways. Material and Methods This study includes patients from Uppsala University Hospital and Västerås Hospital diagnosed with early breast cancer, 20mm or less, treated surgically between 1987 and 2004. Women with lymph node metastases or treated with mastectomy or chemotherapy were excluded. A panel of biomarkers (HER2, PR, Ki67, COX2, p16/INK4A, FOXA1 and SIAH2) were assayed and scored in PreludeDx's CLIA lab by board-certified pathologists. There were 171 eligible patients with biomarker data; 131 received RT and 9 received hormone therapy. Risk groups were calculated using biomarkers and clinical factors age and size. Absolute 10-year IBE risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results There were 49 IBEs recorded. The biologic signature classified 41% of women into a low risk group. Patients in the elevated risk group had a significantly increased risk of 10-year IBE compared to those in the low risk group (Table 1). The HR for elevated vs. low risk group was 5.0 [2.2-11], p & lt;0.001, in a multivariate analysis of risk group and RT. Patients in the elevated risk group treated with BCS and RT had an 18% apparent risk difference in 10-year IBE. Patients in the low risk group had similar low 10-year risks of IBE, when treated with BCS, with or without RT. The low risk women had somewhat increased prevalence of low grade tumors (58% vs. 41%). Women with low grade and small tumors (up to 10mm) were classified into both risk groups (54% low vs. 38% elevated risk). Table 1:10-year Risks of Local Recurrence by Risk GroupBCS without RTBCS plus RTN10-Yr local IBE Risk, 95%CIn10-Yr local IBE Risk, 95%CIBaseline4028%, [11% – 31%]13122% [12% – 24%] Low Risk Group196% [0%-14%]516% [0%-12%] Elevated Risk Group2149% [20%-68%]8031% [21% - 41%] Discussion A biologic risk signature identified early breast cancer patients with low and elevated 10-year IBE risks for women treated with BCS with or without RT and no chemotherapy. Approximately 40% of women were classified into a low risk group with a 0.5% IBE risk per year. Women in the elevated risk group had 3% to 5% IBE risks per year depending on treatment. Treatment for women in this observational study was neither randomized nor strictly rules based. With further prospective validation, the biologic signature identified herein may provide a tool enabling improved management for women diagnosed with early breast cancer. Citation Format: Bremer T, Savala J, Leesman G, Wärnberg F, Sund M, Wadsten C, Whitworth PW. A biologic signature to predict ipsilateral breast event risk at 10 years for early breast cancer [abstract] . In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-57.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2018
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P4-09-08-P4-09-08
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 4_Supplement ( 2018-02-15), p. P4-09-08-P4-09-08
    Abstract: Background: A majority of patients with early breast cancer is operated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is administered to prevent ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), including a new ipsilateral cancer. The EBCTCG meta-analysis showed a majority of patients treated with surgery only to be recurrence free at 10 years, and more than 10% to suffer an IBTR despite RT, thus implying considerable over- and under treatment. A wide range of prognosticators, including multigene tests, are well established, but we lack predictive factors for RT, which is the aim in the present study. Patients and methods: Fresh frozen tissue from 340 patients operated with BCS with or without RT and with or without IBTR was collected (without IBTR N=196, with IBTR n=144). Patients were stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status and RT, and divided into a training cohort (N=172) and a validation cohort (N=168). The training cohort was analyzed with whole transcriptome analysis (Illumina HT12 v4) and top discriminating genes for IBTR (N=155) were selected based on a random forest machine learning algorithm with recursive feature elimination and cross-validation. Further, genes described in the literature as associated with radioresistance were included in the panel to a total of 248 genes. A custom nCounter (Nanostring Technologies) gene expression panel was designed and both the training and validation cohorts were analyzed with the custom panel. Single-sample classifiers using a k-top scoring pairs algorithm were trained in the training cohort and validated in the validation cohort. Area under the curve (AUC) with a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis were calculated and p-values were calculated with a log-rank test. All calculations were done using the R statistical environment. Results: Our classifiers were prognostic for IBTR in the validation cohort among ER+ patients given RT (AUC 0.67, p=0.005), ER+ patients not given RT (AUC=0.89, p=0.015) and ER- patients given RT (AUC=0.78, p & lt;0.001), while the number of ER- patients not given RT was too small for subgroup analysis (N=4). We also created a sequential algorithm were a first classifier was applied to test the risk of IBTR without RT. If low, the tumor was classified as “surgery only”. If classified as high, a second classifier was applied to test the risk of recurrence when given RT. If the risk was predicted low after RT, the tumor was classified as “radiosensitive”. If high, the tumor was classified as “radioresistant”. Among ER+ patients in the validation cohort, the “radiosensitive” tumors had an excellent effect of RT (p & lt;0.001), the “radioresistant” had no effect of RT (p=0.4) and a very high risk of recurrence (55% at 10 years). The tumors predicted as “surgery only” had no effect of RT (p=0.4), and a lower risk of recurrence than the “radioresistant” patients (25% at 10 years). Conclusions: Our targeted radiosensitivity gene expression panel could identify patients of high or low risk of LR, with or without RT. The most promising was however that it seems as the panel could be used as a predictive marker, i.e., finding patients that do, or do not, respond to RT. Further refinement and testing of the panel and models is ongoing. Citation Format: Sjöström M, Staaf J, Edén P, Wärnberg F, Bergh J, Malmström P, Fernö M, Niméus E, Fredriksson I. A targeted breast cancer radiosensitivity gene expression panel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...