GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (64)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 65, No. 17 ( 2005-09-01), p. 7591-7595
    Abstract: Protein kinases are frequently mutated in human cancer and inhibitors of mutant protein kinases have proven to be effective anticancer drugs. We screened the coding sequences of 518 protein kinases (∼1.3 Mb of DNA per sample) for somatic mutations in 26 primary lung neoplasms and seven lung cancer cell lines. One hundred eighty-eight somatic mutations were detected in 141 genes. Of these, 35 were synonymous (silent) changes. This result indicates that most of the 188 mutations were “passenger” mutations that are not causally implicated in oncogenesis. However, an excess of ∼40 nonsynonymous substitutions compared with that expected by chance (P = 0.07) suggests that some nonsynonymous mutations have been selected and are contributing to oncogenesis. There was considerable variation between individual lung cancers in the number of mutations observed and no mutations were found in lung carcinoids. The mutational spectra of most lung cancers were characterized by a high proportion of C:G & gt; A:T transversions, compatible with the mutagenic effects of tobacco carcinogens. However, one neuroendocrine cancer cell line had a distinctive mutational spectrum reminiscent of UV-induced DNA damage. The results suggest that several mutated protein kinases may be contributing to lung cancer development, but that mutations in each one are infrequent.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 8, No. 7 ( 2018-07-01), p. 822-835
    Abstract: KRAS is the most common oncogenic driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC). We previously reported that STK11/LKB1 (KL) or TP53 (KP) comutations define distinct subgroups of KRAS-mutant LUAC. Here, we examine the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in these subgroups. Objective response rates to PD-1 blockade differed significantly among KL (7.4%), KP (35.7%), and K-only (28.6%) subgroups (P & lt; 0.001) in the Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) cohort (174 patients) with KRAS-mutant LUAC and in patients treated with nivolumab in the CheckMate-057 phase III trial (0% vs. 57.1% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.047). In the SU2C cohort, KL LUAC exhibited shorter progression-free (P & lt; 0.001) and overall (P = 0.0015) survival compared with KRASMUT;STK11/LKB1WT LUAC. Among 924 LUACs, STK11/LKB1 alterations were the only marker significantly associated with PD-L1 negativity in TMBIntermediate/High LUAC. The impact of STK11/LKB1 alterations on clinical outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors extended to PD-L1–positive non–small cell lung cancer. In Kras-mutant murine LUAC models, Stk11/Lkb1 loss promoted PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor resistance, suggesting a causal role. Our results identify STK11/LKB1 alterations as a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1 blockade in KRAS-mutant LUAC. Significance: This work identifies STK11/LKB1 alterations as the most prevalent genomic driver of primary resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Genomic profiling may enhance the predictive utility of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden and facilitate establishment of personalized combination immunotherapy approaches for genomically defined LUAC subsets. Cancer Discov; 8(7); 822–35. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Etxeberria et al., p. 794. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 781
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2159-8274 , 2159-8290
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2607892-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 23, No. 2 ( 2017-01-15), p. 379-386
    Abstract: Purpose: The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in breast cancer has not been demonstrated. We hypothesized that we could perform NGS of a new biopsy from patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a clinically actionable timeframe. Experimental Design: We planned to enroll 40 patients onto a prospective study, Individualized Molecular Analyses Guide Efforts (IMAGE), to evaluate the feasibility of obtaining a new biopsy of a metastatic site, perform NGS (FoundationOne), and convene a molecular tumor board to formulate treatment recommendations within 28 days. We collected blood at baseline and at time of restaging to assess cell-free circulating plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA). Results: We enrolled 26 women with metastatic TNBC who had received ≥1 line of prior chemotherapy, and 20 (77%) underwent NGS of a metastatic site biopsy. Twelve (60%) evaluable patients received treatment recommendations within 28 days of consent. The study closed after 20 patients underwent NGS, based on protocol-specified interim futility analysis. Three patients went on to receive genomically directed therapies. Twenty-four of 26 patients had genetic alterations successfully detected in ptDNA. Among 5 patients, 4 mutations found in tumor tissues were not identified in blood, and 4 mutations found in blood were not found in corresponding tumors. In 9 patients, NGS of follow-up blood samples showed 100% concordance with baseline blood samples. Conclusions: This study demonstrates challenges of performing NGS on prospective tissue biopsies in patients with metastatic TNBC within 28 days, while also highlighting the potential use of blood as a more time-efficient and less invasive method of mutational assessment. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 379–86. ©2016 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 20, No. 1 ( 2014-01-01), p. 68-75
    Abstract: Purpose: Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) is a rare and aggressive form of bladder cancer. We conducted genomic analyses [next-generation sequencing (NGS)] of MPUC and non-micropapillary urothelial bladder carcinomas (non-MPUC) to characterize the genomic landscape and identify targeted treatment options. Experimental Design: DNA was extracted from 40 μm of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections from 15 MPUC and 64 non-MPUC tumors. Sequencing (NGS) was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation–based libraries to high coverage for 3,230 exons of 182 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 14 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. The results were evaluated for all classes of genomic alteration. Results: Mutations in the extracellular domain of ERBB2 were identified in 6 of 15 (40%) of MPUC: S310F (four cases), S310Y (one case), and R157W (one case). All six cases of MPUC with ERBB2 mutation were negative for ERBB2 amplification and Erbb2 overexpression. In contrast, 6 of 64 (9.4%) non-MPUC harbored an ERBB2 alteration, including base substitution (three cases), amplification (two cases), and gene fusion (one case), which is higher than the 2 of 159 (1.3%) protein-changing ERBB2 mutations reported for urinary tract cancer in COSMIC. The enrichment of ERBB2 alterations in MPUC compared with non-MPUC is significant both between this series (P & lt; 0.0084) and for all types of urinary tract cancer in COSMIC (P & lt; 0.001). Conclusions: NGS of MPUC revealed a high incidence of mutation in the extracellular domain of ERBB2, a gene for which there are five approved targeted therapies. NGS can identify genomic alteration, which inform treatment options for the majority of MPUC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 20(1); 68–75. ©2013 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 12, No. 11_Supplement ( 2013-11-01), p. B122-B122
    Abstract: Background: Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (MPUC) encompasses approximately 5% of all bladder cancers and comprises approximately 3,000 to 4,000 new cases diagnosed each year in the US. MPUUPC is a highly aggressive form of bladder cancer associated with distant metastases and shortened patient survival. Once MPUC recurs progresses from loco-regional and progresses to metastatic disease, there is no currently no recognized effective treatment. We conducted a genomic analysis of a series of patients with MPUC to characterize the genomic landscape of MUPUC and identify targeted treatment options for patients with this lethal form of urologic malignancy. Methods: DNA was extracted from 40 microns of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections from 15 MPUC and 64 non-MPUC. Sequencing to high, uniform coverage was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligated, hybridization capturedion based libraries for for 3,230 exons of 182 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns offrom 14 genes frequently rearranged in cancer to high, uniform coverage and evaluated for all classes of genomic alteration. Results: Extracellular domain mutations of ERBB2 were identified in 6/15 (40%) MPUC including: S310F (4 cases), S310Y (1 case) and R157W (1 case). All 6 cases of MPUC with ERBB2 mutation were negative for ERBB2 amplification which was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the 3 cases where additional tissue was available. In contrast, 6/64 (9.4%) of non-MPUC harbored an ERBB2 alteration: base substitutions (3 cases), amplifications (2 cases) and gene fusion (1 case), which is higher than the 2/159 (1.3%) of protein changing ERBB2 mutations reported in urinary tract cancer in COSMIC. The enrichment of ERBB2 alterations in MPUC compared to non-MPUC is significant inbetween this series (p & lt; 0.0084) and for all types of urinary tract cancer in COSMIC (p & lt; 0.001). All 9 ERBB2 WT MPUC cases harbored at least 1 actionable alteration, including alterations in AKT1, AKT2, CCND1, EGFR, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and RAF1. Conclusions: Comprehensive genomic profiling of MPUC revealed actionable genomic alterations in all 15 specimens including a high incidence of ERBB2 extracellular domain mutation. We conclude that genomic profiling of MUPUC samples can reveal actionable alterations that can inform potential targeted treatment decisions for the majority of patients. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B122. Citation Format: Kai Wang, Jeff S. Ross, Laurie M. Gay, Rami N. Al-Rohil, Tipu Nazeer, Christine E. Sheehan, Timothy A. Jennings, Geoff A. Otto, Amy Donahue, Jie He, Gary Palmer, Siraj Ali, Michelle Nahas, Geneva Young, Elaine LaBrecque, Garrett Frampton, Rachel Erlich, John A. Curran, Tina Brennan, Sean R. Downing, Roman Yelensky, Doron Lipson, Matthew J. Hawryluk, Vincent A. Miller, Philip J. Stephens. A high frequency of activating extracellular domain ERBB2 (HER2) mutation in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B122.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-7163 , 1538-8514
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 6, No. 2 ( 2016-02-01), p. 154-165
    Abstract: Histiocytic neoplasms are clonal, hematopoietic disorders characterized by an accumulation of abnormal, monocyte-derived dendritic cells or macrophages in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis (non-LCH), respectively. The discovery of BRAFV600E mutations in approximately 50% of these patients provided the first molecular therapeutic target in histiocytosis. However, recurrent driving mutations in the majority of patients with BRAFV600E–wild-type non-LCH are unknown, and recurrent cooperating mutations in non-MAP kinase pathways are undefined for the histiocytic neoplasms. Through combined whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing, we identified recurrent kinase fusions involving BRAF, ALK, and NTRK1, as well as recurrent, activating MAP2K1 and ARAF mutations in patients with BRAFV600E–wild-type non-LCH. In addition to MAP kinase pathway lesions, recurrently altered genes involving diverse cellular pathways were identified. Treatment of patients with MAP2K1- and ARAF-mutated non-LCH using MEK and RAF inhibitors, respectively, resulted in clinical efficacy, demonstrating the importance of detecting and targeting diverse kinase alterations in these disorders. Significance: We provide the first description of kinase fusions in systemic histiocytic neoplasms and activating ARAF and MAP2K1 mutations in non-Langerhans histiocytic neoplasms. Refractory patients with MAP2K1- and ARAF-mutant histiocytoses had clinical responses to MEK inhibition and sorafenib, respectively, highlighting the importance of comprehensive genomic analysis of these disorders. Cancer Discov; 6(2); 154–65. ©2015 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 109
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2159-8274 , 2159-8290
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2607892-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 5, No. 8 ( 2015-08-01), p. 850-859
    Abstract: Focal amplification and activating point mutation of the MET gene are well-characterized oncogenic drivers that confer susceptibility to targeted MET inhibitors. Recurrent somatic splice site alterations at MET exon 14 (METex14) that result in exon skipping and MET activation have been characterized, but their full diversity and prevalence across tumor types are unknown. Here, we report analysis of tumor genomic profiles from 38,028 patients to identify 221 cases with METex14 mutations (0.6%), including 126 distinct sequence variants. METex14 mutations are detected most frequently in lung adenocarcinoma (3%), but also frequently in other lung neoplasms (2.3%), brain glioma (0.4%), and tumors of unknown primary origin (0.4%). Further in vitro studies demonstrate sensitivity to MET inhibitors in cells harboring METex14 alterations. We also report three new patient cases with METex14 alterations in lung or histiocytic sarcoma tumors that showed durable response to two different MET-targeted therapies. The diversity of METex14 mutations indicates that diagnostic testing via comprehensive genomic profiling is necessary for detection in a clinical setting. Significance: Here we report the identification of diverse exon 14 splice site alterations in MET that result in constitutive activity of this receptor and oncogenic transformation in vitro. Patients whose tumors harbored these alterations derived meaningful clinical benefit from MET inhibitors. Collectively, these data support the role of METex14 alterations as drivers of tumorigenesis, and identify a unique subset of patients likely to derive benefit from MET inhibitors. Cancer Discov; 5(8); 850–9. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Ma, p. 802. See related article by Paik et al., p. 842. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 783
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2159-8274 , 2159-8290
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2607892-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 13_Supplement ( 2017-07-01), p. 5590-5590
    Abstract: The combination of tumor targeted therapeutics with PD-L1 checkpoint blockade is being explored as a method to increase the clinical benefits of immunotherapy, and expand response to additional cancer types. Merestinib (Mer) is a kinase inhibitor targeting several oncokinases1 (including MET, MST1R, AXL, MERTK, and MKNK1/2) that can potentially modulate immune function, angiogenesis, as well as target the tumor 1-5. To determine the combinatorial potential with immunotherapy, the effects of Mer were evaluated in vitro on human T cells, PBMCs and murine tumor lines CT26 colon carcinoma (harbors KRASmt G12D expresses low Met/no p-Met/high Axl/p-Axl) and B16F10 melanoma (expressing high Met/pMet/peIF4E). Additionally, the anti-tumor effect of Mer was tested in vivo on established CT26 and B16F10 tumors compared to MET specific TKIs (savolitinib, PF4217903) alone or in combination with PD-L1 antibody (Ab) blockade. In vitro, Mer showed no significant effects on either T cells or PBMCs, but was able to inhibit downstream signaling in both CT26 and B16F10 showing activity on murine tumor cell lines. In vivo, daily Mer monotherapy (6, 12 or 24 mg/kg) showed significant anti-tumor effect at all doses in both CT26 and B16F10, that was not seen with either savolitinib or PF4217903. Concurrent combination of Mer (12 mg/kg) and anti-PD-L1 Ab (0.5 mg qw) in CT26 was found to have anti-tumor activity that was synergistic as compared to each single agent alone. While the effect of Mer monotherapy was lost when treatment ended, tumors continued to regress in the combination group even upon cessation of therapy. The combination was well tolerated and resulted in 90% complete responders compared to 30% with anti-PD-L1 Ab alone, 35 days after completing dosing. To test the ability to generate immunologic memory, complete responders were re-challenged with CT26 cells on the contralateral side. All mice in the combination group resisted re-challenge, showing that Mer/PD-L1 Ab combination was triggering immunologic memory. Although there was no significant change in intra-tumor immune cell populations between groups, combination therapy showed an enhanced and unique intra-tumor immune activation/inflammation gene expression signature compared to PD-L1 Ab monotherapy. The enhanced immune activation of the combination therapy, leading to synergistic anti-tumor efficacy, demonstrates that merestinib has the potential to augment immunotherapy while targeting the tumor directly. This preclinical data provides the rationale for the clinical investigation of merestinib in combination with checkpoint therapies targeting the PD-L1/PD1 axis (NCT02791334). 1 - Yan et al. Invest New Drugs 2013;31:833-44 2 - Balan et al. J Biol Chem 2015;290:8110-20 3 - Eyob et al. Cancer Discov 2013;3:751-60 4 - Lemke G. CSH Persp Biol 2013;5:a009076 5 - Piccirillo et al. Nat Immunol 2014;15:503-11 Citation Format: Sau-Chi Betty Yan, Victoria L. Peek, Jennifer R. Stephens, Um L. Um, Amaladas Nelusha, Colleen A. Burns, Kelly M. Credille, Thompson N. Doman, Scott W. Eastman, Beverly L. Falcon, Gerald E. Hall, Philip W. Iversen, Bruce W. Konicek, Jason R. Manro, Any T. Pappas, Julie A. Stewart, Michael B. Topper, Swee-Seong Wong, Michael Kalos, Ruslan D. Novosiadly, Richard A. Walgren, David Schaer. Combination of an oncokinase inhibitor merestinib with anti-PD-L1 results in enhanced immune mediated antitumor activity in CT26 murine tumor model [abstract] . In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5590. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5590
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2017
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 77, No. 13_Supplement ( 2017-07-01), p. 1775-1775
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 13_Supplement ( 2017-07-01), p. 1775-1775
    Abstract: Introduction: In a cohort of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), we identify new potential biomarkers that may predict response to checkpoint inhibitors through an analysis of genomics, PD-L1 protein expression, and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Motivation: In cancer therapy, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors provide long term responses in a subset of patients. The current biomarker, PD-L1 IHC, is only partially successful in identifying responders. TMB, a measure of the number of mutations in a tumor’s genome, is an emerging biomarker that can predict response rates to checkpoint inhibition in addition to PD-L1 IHC. Higher TMB is thought to confer a higher probability of expressing a neoantigen protein recognizable by the immune system as non-self and therefore responding to checkpoint inhibition. While TMB represents the likelihood that tumor cells express immune-triggering neoantigens, PD-L1 expression represents one of many ways a tumor can evade immune response. We investigated the patterns of PD-L1 IHC staining and TMB in NSCLC. Methods: We tabulated PD-L1 IHC stain statuses, TMB, and genomic alterations for 789 unique NSCLC tumor samples. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression was measured by IHC and scored for distribution (0, 1-24%, & gt; 24% of cells) and intensity (0, 1+, 2+) as Negative, Low Positive, or High Positive. Samples were tested with a comprehensive genomic profiling assay that identifies alterations in exons and select introns in 405 genes. TMB was calculated over 1.1 Mb by counting somatic, non-driver genomic alterations and scored as Low ( & lt; 6 mut/Mb), Medium ( & lt; 20, ≥ 6 mut/Mb), or High (≥ 20 mut/Mb). Results: PD-L1 tumor staining was significantly correlated with TMB (P = 3.52e-4), although the correlation was not strong (Spearman’s rho = 0.12). To better explain discordant TMB/PD-L1, we ran Fisher’s exact tests to identify genes enriched for alterations in TMB-High/PDL1-Negative or TMB-Low/PD-L1-High Positive samples. The TMB-High/PD-L1-Negative subset preferentially harbored STK11 loss-of-function alterations with an odds ratio of 3.65 (P = 1.20e-3). The TMB-Low/PD-L1-High Positive subset exhibited enrichment for BRAF alterations with an odds ratio of 5.46 (P = 1.71e-3). Conclusions: TMB-High tumors have high immunogenicity and often rely on PD-L1 expression as a means of immune evasion. Alterations in BRAF and other genes enriched in TMB-Low/PDL1-High Positive samples may trigger immune responses moderated by PD-L1 expression. Samples with these alterations, although often TMB-Low, may nevertheless respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Alterations in STK11 and other genes enriched in TMB-High/PD-L1-Negative samples may be implicated as non-PD-L1-based mechanisms for immune evasion. Although further ongoing analysis is required, our study suggests that the combination of TMB, PD-L1 staining, and genomics may provide the best prediction of response to checkpoint inhibitors. Citation Format: Michael E. Goldberg, Laurie M. Gay, David Fabrizio, Garrett M. Frampton, Julia A. Elvin, Jeffrey S. Ross, Vincent A. Miller, Philip J. Stephens, Lee A. Albacker. The interaction of PD-L1, TMB, and genomic alterations in NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1775. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1775
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 25, No. 7 ( 2019-04-01), p. 2278-2289
    Abstract: Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) inhibitors potentiate the DNA-damaging effects of cytotoxic therapies and/or promote elevated levels of replication stress, leading to tumor cell death. Prexasertib (LY2606368) is a CHK1 small-molecule inhibitor under clinical evaluation in multiple adult and pediatric cancers. In this study, prexasertib was tested in a large panel of preclinical models of pediatric solid malignancies alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Experimental Design: DNA damage and changes in cell signaling following in vitro prexasertib treatment in pediatric sarcoma cell lines were analyzed by Western blot and high content imaging. Antitumor activity of prexasertib as a single agent or in combination with different chemotherapies was explored in cell line–derived (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models representing nine different pediatric cancer histologies. Results: Pediatric sarcoma cell lines were highly sensitive to prexasertib treatment in vitro, resulting in activation of the DNA damage response. Two PDX models of desmoplastic small round cell tumor and one malignant rhabdoid tumor CDX model responded to prexasertib with complete regression. Prexasertib monotherapy also elicited robust responses in mouse models of rhabdomyosarcoma. Concurrent administration with chemotherapy was sufficient to overcome innate resistance or prevent acquired resistance to prexasertib in preclinical models of neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma, or alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, respectively. Conclusions: Prexasertib has significant antitumor effects as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in multiple preclinical models of pediatric cancer. These findings support further investigation of prexasertib in pediatric malignancies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...