GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (2)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Intracellular inhibition of carboxylesterases by benzil: modulation of CPT-11 cytotoxicity
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2006
    In:  Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Vol. 5, No. 9 ( 2006-09-01), p. 2281-2288
    Details
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 5, No. 9 ( 2006-09-01), p. 2281-2288
    Abstract: Carboxylesterases are ubiquitous proteins responsible for the detoxification of xenobiotics. However, these enzymes also activate prodrugs, such as the anticancer agents capecitabine and CPT-11. As a consequence, overexpression of carboxylesterases within tumor cells sensitizes these cells to CPT-11. We have recently identified two classes of carboxylesterase inhibitors based on either a benzil (diphenylethane-1,2-dione) or a benzene sulfonamide scaffold and showed that these compounds inhibit carboxylesterases with Kis in the low nanomolar range. Because both classes of inhibitors show reversible enzyme inhibition, conventional in vitro biochemical assays would not accurately reflect the in situ levels of carboxylesterase activity or inhibition. Therefore, we have developed a novel assay for the determination of intracellular carboxylesterase activity using 4-methylumbelliferone as a substrate. These studies show that benzil and a dimethylbenzil analogue efficiently enter cells and inhibit human intestinal carboxylesterase and rabbit liver carboxylesterase intracellularly. This inhibition results in reduced cytotoxicity to CPT-11 due to the lack of carboxylesterase-mediated conversion of the prodrug to SN-38. These results suggest that intracellular modulation of carboxylesterase activity with benzil or its analogues may be applied to minimize the toxicity of normal cells to CPT-11. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(9):2281–8]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-7163 , 1538-8514
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0160
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 17, No. 10 ( 2011-05-15), p. 3064-3076
    Details
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 17, No. 10 ( 2011-05-15), p. 3064-3076
    Abstract: Purpose: To facilitate development of innovative immunotherapy approaches, especially for treatment concepts exploiting the potential benefits of personalized therapy, there is a need to develop and validate tools to identify patients who can benefit from immunotherapy. Despite substantial effort, we do not yet know which parameters of antitumor immunity to measure and which assays are optimal for those measurements. Experimental Design: The iSBTc-SITC (International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer-Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer), FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and NCI (National Cancer Institute) partnered to address these issues for immunotherapy of cancer. Here, we review the major challenges, give examples of approaches and solutions, and present our recommendations. Results and Conclusions: Although specific immune parameters and assays are not yet validated, we recommend following standardized (accurate, precise, and reproducible) protocols and use of functional assays for the primary immunologic readouts of a trial; consideration of central laboratories for immune monitoring of large, multi-institutional trials; and standardized testing of several phenotypic and functional potential potency assays specific to any cellular product. When reporting results, the full QA (quality assessment)/QC (quality control) should be conducted and selected examples of truly representative raw data and assay performance characteristics should be included. Finally, to promote broader analysis of multiple aspects of immunity, and gather data on variability, we recommend that in addition to cells and serum, RNA and DNA samples be banked (under standardized conditions) for later testing. We also recommend that sufficient blood be drawn to allow for planned testing of the primary hypothesis being addressed in the trial, and that additional baseline and posttreatment blood is banked for testing novel hypotheses (or generating new hypotheses) that arise in the field. Clin Cancer Res; 17(10); 3064–76. ©2011 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2234
    RVK:
    XA 36791
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...